Bagley v. 1122 E. 180th St. Corp

• Decision Date: 15 March 2022
• Docket Number: 15503,Index No. 25795/15,Case No. 2020–03622
• Citation: 203 A.D.3d 502,165 N.Y.S.3d 40
• Parties: Cynthia T. BAGLEY, Plaintiff–Respondent–Appellant, v. 1122 EAST 180TH STREET CORP, Defendant–Appellant–Respondent, Kaufman Manufacturing Group, Defendant, The City of New York et al., Defendants–Respondents. 1122 East 180th Street Corp., Third–Party Plaintiff–Appellant–Respondent, v. AP Plumbing & Heating, Inc., Third–Party Defendant–Respondent–Appellant. 1122 East 180th Street Corp, Second Third–Party Plaintiff–Appellant–Respondent v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York Inc., Second Third–Party Defendant-Respondent.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

203 A.D.3d 502
165 N.Y.S.3d 40

Cynthia T. BAGLEY, Plaintiff–Respondent–Appellant,
v.
1122 EAST 180TH STREET CORP, Defendant–Appellant–Respondent,

Kaufman Manufacturing Group, Defendant,

The City of New York et al., Defendants–Respondents.

1122 East 180th Street Corp., Third–Party Plaintiff–Appellant–Respondent,
v.
AP Plumbing & Heating, Inc., Third–Party Defendant–Respondent–Appellant.

1122 East 180th Street Corp, Second Third–Party Plaintiff–Appellant–Respondent
v.
Consolidated Edison Company of New York Inc., Second Third–Party Defendant-Respondent.

15503
Index No. 25795/15
Case No. 2020–03622

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

ENTERED: March 15, 2022

165 N.Y.S.3d 41

Miller Leiby & Associates, P.C., New York (Jeffrey R. Miller of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Burns & Harris, New York (Daniel Wright of counsel), for Cynthia Bagley, respondent-appellant.

Matthew A. Kaufman, New York, for AP Plumbing & Heating, Inc., respondent-appellant.

Georgia M. Pestana, Corporation Counsel, New York (Julie Steiner of counsel), for municipal respondents.

The Law Office of Alexander C. Aviles, New York (Stephen T. Brewi of counsel), for Consolidated Edison Company of New York, respondent.

Webber, J.P., Moulton, Kennedy, Mendez, Pitt, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mitchell J. Danziger, J.), entered on or about March 9, 2020, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the motion of defendants The City of New York, New York City Department of Education, New York City Department of Design and Construction, and New York City School Construction Authority (collectively, the City defendants) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against them, denied the motion of defendant AP Plumbing & Heating, Inc. for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint against it and to strike the note of issue and for additional discovery, and granted the motion of second third-party defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York Inc. (Con Ed) for summary judgment dismissing the second third-party complaint and all cross claims against it, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the City defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The City defendants failed...