Bailey v. Bailey
| Decision Date | 09 September 2015 |
| Docket Number | No. 4D15–609.,4D15–609. |
| Citation | 176 So.3d 344 |
| Parties | Jonathan Samuel BAILEY, Petitioner, v. Kathy Michelle BAILEY, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
John E. Schwencke and Adam M. Zborowskiof Nugent Zborowski & Bruce, North Palm Beach, for petitioner.
Michael J. Almanand Jamie D. Almanof Greenspoon Marder, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for respondent.
Jonathan Bailey (“Jonathan”), former husband of Kathy Bailey (“Kathy”), seeks certiorari relief from two overlapping trial court orders in a post-dissolution family law case. One order appointed a social investigator and the other, styled “omnibus order,” denied Jonathan's motion to strike and/or dismiss a motion filed by Kathy. Her motion addressed time-sharing and asked that Jonathan submit to a psycho-social and substance abuse evaluation and consent to release of his mental health records to the investigator. We grant the petition in part and deny it in part.
Certiorari lies because the orders compel production of confidential records and require a compulsory examination pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.360. Smith v. Smith,64 So.3d 169, 170–71 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Wicky v. Oxonian,24 So.3d 571, 572 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). Certiorari review calls for a determination of whether the discovery order constituted a departure from the essential requirements of law resulting in material injury with no adequate remedy on appeal. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Langston,655 So.2d 91, 94–95 (Fla.1995).
We quash the provisions in the orders appointing a social investigator because Jonathan was not provided adequate prior notice. The motion to appoint social investigator was filed on the same day as the hearing, and Jonathan's counsel objected to the lack of proper notice. See Henzel v. Golstein,349 So.2d 824, 825 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)( that twenty-four hours' notice of a hearing on a motion to dismiss was inadequate); Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.090(d).
Our ruling renders moot Jonathan's separate argument that the trial court erred in ordering him to execute releases and consent forms to allow the social investigator to review his mental health records. If a social investigator is appointed in the future with adequate notice, Jonathan may assert the psychotherapist-patient privilege. If contested, the trial court could then determine whether that privilege should preclude production. Jonathan did not waive the privilege by relying on his mental condition to support any claims or defenses. Nor did this case present a “calamitous event” so as to preclude assertion of the statutory privilege. See Smith,64 So.3d at 172, n. 2(citing Miraglia v. Miraglia,462 So.2d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Critchlow v. Critchlow,347 So.2d 453 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)).
We reject Jonathan's challenge to those portions of the trial court's orders that compelled him to submit to a psycho-social and substance abuse evaluation. “The granting or denying of an order for a psychological evaluation is a discretionary act.” Pariser v. Pariser,601 So.2d 291, 292 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). “Hence, we can overturn this discretionary ruling only upon a conclusion that no judge could reasonably have ordered such an evaluation.” Gordon v. Smith,615 So.2d 843, 844 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)(citing Pariser,601 So.2d at 292).
The record evidence, including Jonathan's involuntary hospitalization under section 394.463, Florida Statutes (2014), also called the “Baker Act,” demonstrated that his mental condition was in controversy and good cause was shown to compel his evaluation. The trial court made factual findings which adequately supported those conclusions. See Barry v. Barry,159 So.3d 306, 307 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).
Compelling these evaluations is not inconsistent with recognizing that Jonathan may assert the privilege in objecting to production of his existing mental health records. This court observed in Flood v....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Oldham v. Greene
...DCA 2015). Baker Act proceedings or a diagnosed schizoaffective disorder can place mental health in controversy. Bailey v. Bailey , 176 So.3d 344, 346-47 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) ; J.B. , 92 So.3d at 890. Mother fails to cite cases analogous to the instant appeal. Instead, she relies heavily on ......
-
Reno v. Reno, 1D19-1281
...DCA 2015). Baker Act proceedings or a diagnosed schizoaffective disorder can place mental health in controversy. Bailey v. Bailey , 176 So. 3d 344, 346-47 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) ; J.B. [v. M.M. ], 92 So. 3d 888[,] 890 [ (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) ]. 263 So. 3d at 812 (emphasis added). We moved on to ......
-
B.R. v. Dep't of Children & Families
...such an evaluation." E.P.V. v. Dep't of Children & Families, 278 So. 3d 749, 750 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (quoting Bailey v. Bailey, 176 So. 3d 344, 346 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) ). Section 39.407(15), Florida Statutes (2019), provides: At any time after the filing of a shelter petition or petition for......
-
E.P.V. v. Dep't of Children & Families
...health evaluation. "The granting or denying of an order for a [mental health] evaluation is a discretionary act." Bailey v. Bailey, 176 So. 3d 344, 346 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (quoting Pariser v. Pariser, 601 So. 2d 291, 292 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) ). We review such a ruling for abuse of discretion......
-
Emergencies and case management conference
...recommendations in a child custody investigative report without first being given the opportunity to challenge them. • Bailey v. Bailey , 176 So. 3d 344 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). Trial court’s order appointing a social investigator in post-judgment matters, quashed because former husband was not......
-
Trial and evidence
...and permitting them to introduce evidence that might rebut conclusions or recommendations contained in report); Bailey v. Bailey , 176 So. 3d 344 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)(reversing trial court’s order making ex-husband’s time-sharing with his minor children subject to the recommendations of the ......
-
Parental responsibility
...the family lawyer will gain a means for quick and cost efficient discovery and court intervention and relief. CASES • Bailey v. Bailey, 176 So. 3d 344 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). Trial court’s order appointing social investigator in post-dissolution case quashed because former husband was not prov......
-
Domestic violence
...recommendations in a child custody investigative report without first being given the opportunity to challenge them. • Bailey v. Bailey , 176 So. 3d 344 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). Trial court’s order appointing a social investigator in post-judgment matters, quashed because former husband was not......