Bailey v. Long
Decision Date | 23 December 1917 |
Docket Number | (No. 484.) |
Citation | 175 N.C. 687,94 S.E. 675 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | BAILEY . v. LONG. |
Appeal from Superior Court, Burke County; Justice, Judge.
Action by J. W. Bailey against H. P. Long. From a dismissal of the action, plaintiff appeals. New trial ordered.
See, also, 172 N. C. 661, 90 S. E. 809, L. R. A. 1917B, 708.
Avery & Avery, of Elk Park, R. L. Huffman and A. C. Avery, both of Morganton, and D. L. Russell, of Hickory, for appellant.
W. D. Turner, of Statesville, S. J. Ervin, of Morgan-ton, Z. V. Long, of Statesville, and J. F. Spain-hour, of Morganton, for appellee.
This action was brought by the plaintiff, to recover damages for (1) loss of the services of his wife, (2) loss of her society, and (3) mental anguish on account of her death, which is alleged to have been caused by the defendant's negligence. At the close of the plaintiff's evidence, the defendant, who introduced none, moved for a nonsuit, which was granted, and plaintiff appealed.
The only question in the case is whether there was any evidence of negligence; the weight and sufficiency of it being for the jury to consider. While the evidence may not be of a very strong or conclusive nature, we cannot say upon a perusal of it that there was literally no evidence which should have been submitted to the jury". The allegation of the plaintiff is that his wife, who was suffering with a broken hip, for her better treatment by a most competent and skillful surgeon, was taken by him to Statesville on August 18, 1913, and placed in the hospital of defendant, who contracted to treat her in a careful and skillful manner as a physician and surgeon, and to furnish her with a suitable room during her stay therein. There is no complaint at all of the surgical treatment, but plaintiff alleges that, when the dislocation of the hip had almost healed under the defendant's skillful treatment, and when she was otherwise in goodhealth and about to be discharged from the hospital, his wife's room, by reason of a defect in the construction of the window sash, was covered with water from a rain and on account of her exposure to the dampness of the room caused thereby she contracted a severe cold, which increased in severity until it developed into pneumonia, which finally caused her death. The evidence tended to show that the deceased was a strong and healthy woman, and had no cough and no trouble with her throat until she caught cold just after the rain. The water was an inch or an inch and a half deep in one corner of the room near her bed, and if the floor had been level it would have been the same depth all over. It required some time to remove it, and the floor was damp afterwards. After plaintiff had bored holes in the outside sash, and let out the water between the sashes, he was asked to fix the window in another room in the same condition, which he did. The plaintiff testified as> to the condition of the window:
He stated that the rain occurred on September 10, 1913. He then testified:
This witness further stated that they returned to his home on September 25, 1913; that her cough continued, and her physical condition was bad, until he called in a physician, Dr. Flowers, on Monday, November 16, 1913, who examined his wife, and witness then further testified:
"
Susie Parker, one of the nurses, testified:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hayhurst v. Boyd Hospital
... ... question on cross-examination ... 5 ... Negligence of hospital nurse in leaving patient sitting up a ... long time without proper wraps, whereby from exposure and ... fatigue he contracted pneumonia, held within the rule that ... negligent acts producing an ... of the injury, is sufficient to carry the question to the ... jury." (13 Cyc. 216; Bailey v. Long, 175 N.C ... 687, 94 S.E. 675; Quackenbush v. Chicago & N.W. R ... Co., 73 Iowa 458, 35 N.W. 523; Hansman v. Western ... Union Tel ... ...
-
Hinnant v. Tide Water Power Co.
... ... Railway, 160 N.C. 450, 76 S.E ... It may ... be observed in this connection that the facts disclosed in ... Bailey v. Long, 172 N.C. 661, 90 S.E. 809, L. R. A ... 1917B, 708, are distinguishable from those in the case at ... bar. The foundation of liability in ... ...
-
Fields v. Ogburn
...nor do we see that the principles upon which they rest are in any wise affected by the cases cited for appellant. Bailey v. Long, 175 N.C. 687, 94 S.E. 675, a case where a patient taken for treatment in defendant's hospital claimed to have been injured from exposure caused by a defective bu......
-
Oroom Et Ux v. Murphy
...in Carter V. Railroad, 138 N. C. 750 ." In Bailey v. Long, 172 N. C. 661, 90 S. E. 809, L. R. A. 1917B, 708, and Bailey v. Long, 175 N. C. 687, 94 S. E. 675, the cases relied on by the plaintiff, the death was not instantaneous,, and this distinguishes them from the present case. The judgme......