Baker v. State

Citation587 N.Y.S.2d 801,186 A.D.2d 329
PartiesHezekiah E. BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of New York, Respondent.
Decision Date24 September 1992
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

Hezekiah E. Baker, in pro. per.

Robert Abrams, Atty. Gen. (Dennis Hurley, of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before MIKOLL, J.P., and LEVINE, MAHONEY, CASEY and HARVEY, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Lyons, J.), entered October 23, 1991, which, inter alia, granted the State's motion to dismiss the claim.

Neither claimant's notice of intention to file a claim nor the claim itself were filed within the time limitations set forth in Court of Claims Act § 10(3). In fact, the notice of intention was not filed until July 10, 1991, which was over two years beyond the accrual date of June 8, 1989. Insofar as the time limitations of the statute are jurisdictional, the Court of Claims properly dismissed the claim as untimely (see, Smith v. State of New York, 41 N.Y.2d 1063, 396 N.Y.S.2d 174, 364 N.E.2d 838; Kurtz v. State of New York, 40 A.D.2d 917, 338 N.Y.S.2d 345, aff'd 33 N.Y.2d 828, 351 N.Y.S.2d 973, 307 N.E.2d 46). We also reject claimant's contention that he falls within the time strictures of Court of Claims Act § 10(5), wherein a claim may be filed within two years following the termination of a legal disability. Any such defense ended on January 12, 1988 when it was judicially determined that claimant was not an incapacitated person. Given that the notice of intention was not filed until July 10, 1991 and that the claim was not filed until July 22, 1991, claimant failed to satisfy that statutory time provision as well (see, Kurtz v. State of New York, supra ). There is nothing in the record to support his claim of a continuing legal disability.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Goines v. State
    • United States
    • New York Court of Claims
    • January 16, 2023
    ... ... 417, 419 [3d Dept 1989]; see also Boland , 30 N.Y.2d ... at 342-343 [psychiatric hospitalization]; Puckerin v ... State of New York , 159 A.D.3d 848 [2d Dept 2018] ... [psychiatric hospitalization]; Weber v State of New ... York , 267 AD 325 [3d Dept 1944] [infancy]; cf. Baker ... v State of New York , 186 A.D.2d 329, 329 [3d Dept 1992] ... [holding section 10(5) did not apply after "it was ... judicially determined that claimant was not an incapacitated ... person"]) ...          Here, ... despite movant's extensive physical injuries and long ... ...
  • Andres v. Ames Dept. Store Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 24, 1992

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT