Baker v. State, SC13–2331
Decision Date | 23 March 2017 |
Docket Number | No. SC14–873,No. SC13–2331,SC13–2331,SC14–873 |
Citation | 214 So.3d 530 |
Parties | Cornelius O. BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Cornelius O. Baker, Petitioner, v. Julie L. Jones, etc., Respondent. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
James V. Viggiano, Jr., Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Middle Region, and Ann Marie Mirialakis and Ali A. Shakoor, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Middle Region, Temple Terrace, Florida, for Appellant/Petitioner
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Vivian Singleton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Appellee/Respondent
Cornelius Baker, a prisoner under sentence of death, appeals an order of the circuit court denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851 and petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), (9), Fla. Const. For the reasons stated below, we reverse the trial court's denial of postconviction relief as to Baker's claim relating to the constitutionality of his penalty phase, vacate Baker's death sentence, and remand for a new penalty phase. We deny, however, Baker's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
Baker was convicted by a jury and sentenced to death for the January 2007 robbery, kidnapping, and murder of Elizabeth Uptagrafft. This Court summarized the case in greater detail on direct appeal. The relevant facts here are as follows:
Baker v. State , 71 So.3d 802, 808–09 (Fla. 2011). Baker was indicted on charges of first-degree murder, home invasion robbery with a firearm, kidnapping, conspiracy, burglary of a structure or conveyance, and aggravated fleeing and eluding a law enforcement officer. Id. at 811. The jury found Baker guilty of one count each of first-degree murder, home invasion robbery, kidnapping, and aggravated fleeing and eluding a law enforcement officer. Id.
At the penalty phase, Baker's attorney, Matthew Phillips, presented testimony from psychologist Dr. Harry Krop, Baker's mother and two sisters, and Baker himself. At the conclusion of the penalty phase, the jury returned a recommendation in favor of death by a vote of nine to three. Id. at 812. The trial court sentenced Baker to death, making the following findings as to the aggravating and mitigating circumstances:
Id. at 813 (footnotes omitted). In addition to its death sentence, the trial court sentenced Baker to life imprisonment for the charge of home invasion with a firearm, life imprisonment for the charge of kidnapping, and fifteen years' imprisonment for the charge of aggravated fleeing and eluding a law enforcement officer. Id.
On direct appeal, Baker raised seven claims.1 This Court affirmed Baker's convictions and sentences. Id. at 825. The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. Baker v. Florida , 565 U.S. 1237, 132 S.Ct. 1639, 182 L.Ed.2d 238 (2012). Baker filed an initial postconviction motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851, raising six claims.2 On September 16, 2013, the trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing on Baker's ineffective assistance claim. At the evidentiary hearing, Baker called trial counsel to testify regarding his twenty years of experience as a public defender, his recollection of Baker's examination during the penalty phase, and Baker's letter of remorse. Phillips was the only witness called to testify at the hearing. On October 14, 2013, the trial court denied all relief.
Baker has appealed the denial of his postconviction motion to this Court. He has also filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus with this Court.
Baker has raised the following six issues in this appeal: (1) trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel during the penalty phase of the trial by failing to proffer Baker's letter of apology; (2) the trial court erred in denying Baker's claim that Florida's rule prohibiting defense counsel from interviewing jurors is unconstitutional under the federal and state constitutions; (3) section 921.141 is facially vague and overbroad, the trial court's instruction to the jury that its role was advisory was unconstitutional, and trial counsel provided ineffective assistance for failing to litigate these claims; (4) Florida's death sentence statute is unconstitutional as applied; (5) Florida's capital sentencing statute does not prevent the arbitrary and capricious imposition of the death penalty, Florida's method of execution is cruel and unusual under the Eighth Amendment, and trial counsel was ineffective for failing to litigate these claims; and (6) cumulative error.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Brown v. State, No. SC19-704
...claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel are properly presented in a petition for writ of habeas corpus, Baker v. State , 214 So. 3d 530, 536 (Fla. 2017) ; Wickham v. State , 124 So. 3d 841, 863 (Fla. 2013), and this Court has explained the applicable standard of review as foll......
-
Jackson v. State
...appellate counsel are properly presented in a petition for writ of habeas corpus[.]" Brown , 304 So. 3d at 278 (citing Baker v. State , 214 So. 3d 530, 536 (Fla. 2017) ; Wickham v. State , 124 So. 3d 841, 863 (Fla. 2013) ). "The standard for a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate co......
-
Ford v. Sec'y
...the prohibition on hearing procedurally defaulted claims. Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1, 9-10 (2012). 5. See, e.g., Baker v. State, 214 So. 3d 530, 536 (Fla. 2017); Serrano v. State, 225 So. 3d 737, 757 (Fla. 2017); Johnson v. Moore, 837 So. 2d 343, 345 (Fla. 2002); Delgado v. State, 174 So.......
-
State v. Smith
...2017) (same); Newberry v. State , 214 So.3d 562 (Fla. 2017) (same); Orme v. State , 214 So.3d 1269 (Fla. 2017) (same); Baker v. State , 214 So.3d 530 (Fla. 2017) (same); Deviney v. State , 213 So.3d 794 (Fla. 2017) (same); Jackson v. State , 213 So.3d 754 (Fla. 2017) (same); Smith v. State ......