Balsan v. County of Suffolk, 2004-03682.

Decision Date06 June 2005
Docket Number2004-03682.
Citation19 A.D.3d 342,2005 NY Slip Op 04516,796 N.Y.S.2d 413
PartiesSCOTT BALSAN, Respondent, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the prior written notice requirement of Suffolk County Charter § C8-2A is inapplicable under the circumstances presented (see Martorano v McNair, 208 AD2d 909 [1994]). The driveway of the abandoned home where the plaintiff slipped and fell due to the accumulation of snow and ice was not the functional equivalent of any of the enumerated locations or structures set forth in Suffolk County Charter § C8-2A (see Walker v Town of Hempstead, 84 NY2d 360 [1994]; cf. Woodson v City of New York, 93 NY2d 936 [1999]; Gonzalez v Town of Mt. Pleasant, 263 AD2d 464 [1999]; Tramontano v County of Suffolk, 239 AD2d 407 [1997]; Doherty v Town of Clarkstown, 233 AD2d 477 [1996]). Since the facts of this case do not fall within Suffolk County Charter § C8-2A, the failure to have given the defendant prior written notice of the snowy and icy condition encountered by the plaintiff on the date of the accident did not warrant summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Moreover, the Supreme Court properly determined that there is a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant had sufficient time after the precipitation and temperature fluctuations ended to remedy the condition complained of (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Lifson, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Albano v. Suffolk Cnty.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 10, 2012
    ...County Charter § C8–2A ( see Abano v. Suffolk County Community Coll., 66 A.D.3d at 719, 887 N.Y.S.2d 200;cf. Balsan v. County of Suffolk, 19 A.D.3d 342, 796 N.Y.S.2d 413). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendants received prior writte......
  • Astrep Service Corp. v. Banco Popular North America
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 6, 2005
    ... ... [19 A.D.3d 342] ... much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), dated April 19, 2004, as denied its motion for an order ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT