Albano v. Suffolk Cnty.

Decision Date10 October 2012
CitationAlbano v. Suffolk Cnty., 99 A.D.3d 741, 952 N.Y.S.2d 245, 2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 6769 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
PartiesRose ALBANO, appellant, v. SUFFOLK COUNTY, et al., respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Harmon, Linder, & Rogowsky, New York, N.Y. (Mitchell Dranow of counsel), for appellant.

Dennis M. Cohen, County Attorney, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Diana T. Bishop of counsel), for respondents.

DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, J.P., THOMAS A. DICKERSON, ARIEL E. BELEN, and ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated December 14, 2010, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff alleged that, while attending a graduation ceremony at the defendant Suffolk County Community College (hereinafter the College), she tripped and fell on a defective condition on the campus grounds. The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries against the Collegeand Suffolk County. The defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that they had no prior written notice of the alleged defect as required by Suffolk County Charter § C8–2A. “A municipality that has adopted a ‘prior written notice law’ cannot be held liable for a defect within the scope of the law absent the requisite written notice, unless an exception to the requirement applies” ( Forbes v. City of New York, 85 A.D.3d 1106, 1107, 926 N.Y.S.2d 309;see Poirier v. City of Schenectady, 85 N.Y.2d 310, 624 N.Y.S.2d 555, 648 N.E.2d 1318;Hanover Ins. Co. v. Town of Pawling, 94 A.D.3d 1055, 943 N.Y.S.2d 152,lv. denied19 N.Y.3d 811, 2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 83576, 2012 WL 3930687 [2012];Abano v. Suffolk County Community Coll., 66 A.D.3d 719, 887 N.Y.S.2d 200). “The only two recognized exceptions to a prior written notice requirement are the municipality's affirmative creation of a defect or where the defect is created by the municipality's special use of the property” ( Forbes v. City of New York, 85 A.D.3d at 1107, 926 N.Y.S.2d 309;see Amabile v. City of Buffalo, 93 N.Y.2d 471, 474, 693 N.Y.S.2d 77, 715 N.E.2d 104).

Here, the defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that they did not have prior written notice of the alleged dangerous condition, and that it was located in an area subject to the prior written notice provisions of Suffolk County Charter § C8–2A ( see Abano v. Suffolk County Community Coll., 66 A.D.3d at 719, 887 N.Y.S.2d 200;cf. Balsan v. County of Suffolk, 19 A.D.3d 342, 796 N.Y.S.2d 413). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
13 cases
  • Dutka v. Odierno
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 7, 2016
    ...to the requirement applies" (Abano v. Suffolk County Community Coll., 66 A.D.3d 719, 719, 887 N.Y.S.2d 200 ; see Albano v. Suffolk County, 99 A.D.3d 741, 952 N.Y.S.2d 245 ; Miller v. Village of E. Hampton, 98 A.D.3d 1007, 951 N.Y.S.2d 171 ; De La Reguera v. City of Mount Vernon, 74 A.D.3d 1......
  • Donadio v. City of N.Y.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 18, 2015
    ...to the requirement applies” (Abano v. Suffolk County Community Coll., 66 A.D.3d 719, 719, 887 N.Y.S.2d 200 ; see Albano v. Suffolk County, 99 A.D.3d 741, 952 N.Y.S.2d 245 ; Miller v. Village of E. Hampton, 98 A.D.3d 1007, 951 N.Y.S.2d 171 ; De La Reguera v. City of Mount Vernon, 74 A.D.3d 1......
  • Johnson v. Johnson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 10, 2012
    ... ... limited by her brief, from so much of an amended judgment of divorce of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kent, J.), entered July 1, 2011, as awarded the defendant 50% of the appreciation of the ... ...
  • Morelli v. Starbucks Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 26, 2013
    ...56 A.D.3d 438, 439, 866 N.Y.S.2d 781;Matter of Iorio v. Hyler, 49 A.D.3d 738, 739, 854 N.Y.S.2d 732;see also Albano v. Suffolk County, 99 A.D.3d 741, 742, 952 N.Y.S.2d 245). The parties' remaining contentions need not be reached in light of our ...
  • Get Started for Free