Bardwell v. State

Decision Date16 December 1929
Docket Number27754
Citation125 So. 85,155 Miss. 711
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesBARDWELL v. STATE

Division A

1 RAPE. Evidence of physician and another witness held sufficient to corroborate testimony of prosecutrix in rape prosecution (Hemingway's Code 1927, section 1147).

In prosecution for attempt to rape as defined in Laws 1908 chapter 171 (Hemingway's Code 1927, section 1147) evidence given by physician indicating that an assault had probably been made on person of prosecutrix of character she claimed, and her condition on arrival home indicating that something unusual had probably occurred, and testimony of another witness that prosecutrix was forcibly carried away by defendant and another, held sufficient corroboration of testimony of prosecutrix to warrant verdict of guilty.

2. RAPE. In rape prosecution, whether penetration was insufficient to constitute full offense held for jury (Hemingway's Code 1927, section 1147).

In prosecution for attempt to rape, as defined by Laws 1908, chapter 171 (Hemingway's Code 1927, section 1147), question whether or not penetration was insufficient to constitute full offense held for jury.

HON. E. J. SIMMONS, Judge.

APPEAL from circuit court of Pike county HON. E. J. SIMMONS, Judge.

Cephus Bardwell was convicted of attempt to rape, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Affirmed.

L. H. McGehee and J. S. McGuire, both of McComb, for appellant.

Under the express provisions of Chapter 171, Laws 1914, Hemingway's Code, Volume 1, sec. 1148, no person shall be convicted of statutory rape upon the uncorroborated testimony of the injured female.

Hollins v. State, 128 Miss. 119, 90 So. 630; Golding v. State, 144 Miss. 208, 109 So. 731; State v. Bradford, 126 Miss. 868, 89 So. 767; Herbert Nelson v. State, 115 So. 899.

Corroborate, "to strengthen; to add weight or credibility to a thing by additional and confirming facts of evidence.

Still v. State (Tex. Cr. R.), 50 S.W. 355; State v. Hicks, 6 S.D. 325, 60 N.W. 66; Schefter v. Hatch, 70 Hun. 597, 25 N.Y.S. 240; Blacks Law Dictionary; State v. Guild, 10 N.J.L. 163, 18 Am. Dec. 404.

Corroborating evidence is evidence supplementary to that already given and tending to strengthen or confirm it; additional evidence of a different character to the same point.

Gildersleeve v. Atkinson, 6 N. M. 250, 27 P. 477; Mills v. Comm., 93 Va. 815, 22 S.E. 863; Code Civ. Proc. Cal. 1903, sec. 1839; 4 Wigmore on Evidence, p. 8, sec. 2062; 93 Va. 815; 73 Ala. 751; 14 C. J., p. 1428; Lassiter v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co., 171 N.C. 283, 297, 88 S.E. 335; State v. Fullerton Lbr. Co., 35 S.D. 410, 433, 152 N.W. 708; State v. Hicks, 6 S.D. 325, 327, 60 N.W. 66; Radford v. MacDonald, 18 Ont. A. 167, 173; Mills v. Com., 93 Va. 815, 818, 22 S.E. 862; State v. Bucket, 18 Ore. 228, 22 P. 838; Schartz v. Com., 27 Gratt. 68 Va. 1025, 1032, 21 Am. R. 365; Romes v. Com., 164 Ky. 334, 337, 175 S.W. 339; Louisville, etc., R. Co. v. Crayton, 69 Miss. 152, 159; People v. Page, 56 N.E. 752; Mills v. Commonwealth, 22 S.E. 863; State v. Stowell (Iowa case), 15 N.W. 418; State v. Wheller, 89 N.W. 978; State v. Elbert, 101 N.W. 191; Krug v. State, 216 N.W. 664.

It is well settled in Mississippi that under the age of consent statute the injured female must be corroborated, with reference to the felonious act.

Ferguson v. State, 71 Miss. 805; Hollins v. State, 128 Miss. 119; Grogan v. State, 118 So. 627.

Forrest B. Jackson, Assistant Attorney-General, for the state.

Evidence of physician and another witness is sufficient to corroborate testimony of prosecutrix in a prosecution for rape under Hemingway's Code 1927, sec. 1147.

Thompson v. State, 124 Miss. 463, 86 So. 871.

In this case the crime of rape was not completed.

22 R. C. L., p. 1177, sec. 7; 22 R. C. L., p. 1236, sec. 76; 80 Am. Dec., p. 362.

OPINION

Smith, C. J.

The appellant was indicted and convicted of an attempt to rape as defined by chapter 171, Laws 1908 (Hem. 1927 Code, section 1147). His contention is that his request for a directed verdict in his favor should have been granted for two reasons: First, the prosecutrix was not corroborated as to the attempted act of sexual intercourse; second, the evidence discloses that the crime, if committed, was complete, and therefore he could not be convicted of an attempt to commit it.

The appellant, the prosecutrix, and two other young people were returning from an entertainment, at night, in an automobile driven by the appellant, which was stopped near the residence of the prosecutrix, where the two young people other than the appellant and prosecutrix got out. Another automobile in which there were several people, among whom was Robert Bardwell, a cousin of the appellant, came up, and Robert Bardwell left the car in which he was riding and got into the car with the appellant and the prosecutrix, and the appellant immediately drove the car off.

According to the testimony of the prosecutrix, she attempted to get out of the car, but, over her protest, was forced to remain in it by the Bardwells, and in this she was corroborated by one other witness. According to her testimony, the car was then driven by the appellant some distance away into the woods where she was taken out of the car by the Bardwells, and there the appellant had, or attempted to have, sexual intercourse with her. Afterwards she got back into the car with the Bardwells, and was driven within a short distance of her home, where she got out. She was asked by the Bardwells to say nothing about what had occurred. On her way back home, after leaving the car, she was seen by a policeman, who testified that she was crying. Upon reaching home she told her parents what had occurred, and they, with others there...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Winters v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • July 24, 1985
    ...of his post-trial motion as requests entry of judgment of acquittal notwithstanding the verdict of the jury. See Bardwell v. State, 155 Miss. 711, 715, 125 So. 85, 86 (1929). B. The motion for a new trial is somewhat different. That motion is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial c......
  • Calloway v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • December 16, 1929
  • Boyd v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • November 11, 1940
    ... ... the fact that someone had raped this child, there is no ... dispute. It is abundantly shown. She stated that appellant ... was the guilty man and the situation was such as that it ... leaves no doubt but that he was actually such. Reeves v ... State, 159 Miss. 498, 132 So. 331; Bardwell v ... State, 155 Miss. 711, 125 So. 85; Fairley v ... State, 152 Miss. 656, 120 So. 747; and particularly ... Cavender v. State (Miss.), 180 So. 789. What was ... said in the Cavender case, supra, can be said of this case ... without any change or alteration whatsoever ... ...
  • Yancey v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • October 13, 1947
    ... ... examination of the prosecutrix was found to be equally ... consistent with innocence, especially in view of his ... testimony that her condition could innocently have been ... caused. He was unable to attribute it to an act of the ... defendant. This falls below the test applied in Bardwell ... v. State, 155 Miss. 711, 125 So. 85 ... The ... witness, Merrill, testified that about the time and at the ... place where the alleged assault was committed, he saw a car, ... identified by other witnesses as being similar to the car of ... defendant. He saw therein only a man ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT