Barnes v. Providence Sanitarium, (No. 6519.)

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
Writing for the CourtSmith
Citation229 S.W. 588
PartiesBARNES v. PROVIDENCE SANITARIUM.
Decision Date23 March 1921
Docket Number(No. 6519.)
229 S.W. 588
BARNES
v.
PROVIDENCE SANITARIUM.
(No. 6519.)
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.
March 23, 1921.
Rehearing Denied April 13, 1921.

Appeal from District Court, McLennan County; H. M. Richey, Judge.

Suit by J. N. Barnes against the Providence Sanitarium for damages for personal injury. Instructed verdict and judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Tom M. Hamilton and J. A. Kibler, both of Waco, for appellant.

Sanford & Harris, of Waco, for appellee.

SMITH, J.


J. N. Barnes brought suit against the Providence Sanitarium, a Waco hospital corporation, for $40,000 damages, alleging that while he was confined to his bed as a patient in the hospital one of the attendants therein negligently administered a certain treatment to him, whereby he was seriously and permanently injured. The suit was defended upon the ground that the sanitarium was an institution of purely public charity and as such was exempt from liability for the negligent acts of its employés. The trial resulted in an instructed verdict in favor of the sanitarium, and from the judgment rendered in accordance therewith Barnes appeals, complaining: (a) That the trial court should have submitted to the jury the issue of negligence as well as the issue of whether or not the sanitarium was shown to be an institution of purely public charity; and (b) that the evidence not only failed to show that the sanitarium was such institution, but conclusively showed that it was not. We will consider these questions in the reverse order of their presentation.

The purposes of the corporation are thus stated in article II of its charter:

"Said corporation is formed for benevolent and charitable purposes, and especially for the maintenance, support and operation of a hospital in the city of Waco, Texas, at which the members of said corporation will administer to the sick, infirm and afflicted of all creeds and nations, and to enable its members to receive the sick, the helpless and afflicted and to nurse and care for them and to alleviate their pain and suffering and to restore them as far as possible to health."

Sister Regina, the president of the corporation, was the only witness in the case who testified to any facts bearing on the second

Page 589

question raised, or who undertook in any manner to describe or explain the nature of the business of the corporation, or the conduct of it affairs, the source or amount of its income, or the purposes or amounts of its disbursements. No other witness or source of evidence was offered or disclosed, if any existed. Her testimony is not as satisfactory or explicit, or as frank, in some particulars, as we would like or as the nature of the case and the defense thereof is entitled to; but it is undisputed, and, in the particulars mentioned, it comes here unchallenged. It is upon her testimony alone, then, that we state the case.

According to the testimony of Sister Regina, the "Daughters of Charity of St. Vincent de Paul" is a religious "community," the members of which are "Sisters of Charity," as they are described throughout the record in this case. The apparent objects of the order are: (a) The training of young women for nursing the sick and otherwise ministering to the unfortunate, and the care of them after they have devoted their active lives to such work and become infirm and indigent; and (b) through the medium of these Sisters of Charity, the establishment and maintenance of community local houses throughout the world. The parent organization, or "Mother House," is located in Paris, France, and a "Central House" for the eastern division of the United States is at Emmettsburg, Md., and of the western division at St. Louis, Mo., to which latter establishment the local communities in Texas are now attached, and to which they now report. In the United States there are now 30 or 40 "community houses," or hospitals, and in Texas 5, including the one involved.

Appellee, the Providence Sanitarium, is a product of the order mentioned, and is a corporation chartered under the laws of Texas, four Sisters of Charity, members of the community, being the first year directors designated in the charter. The purpose clause of the charter has already been shown. It has no capital stock. No certificates are issued as evidence of ownership of stock or of interest or membership in the corporation. The stockholders, or "members," as they are described in the charter, consist at the present of 12 Sisters of Charity of the community, who are selected by the Sister Superior at St. Louis and sent to Waco for that purpose. They manage the affairs of the corporation under the supervision of the St. Louis authority, who may remove them at will. The interest of these Sisters in the corporation is not assignable in any event. When sent to Waco for that purpose by the Sister Superior of St. Louis, they automatically became members of the corporation, and when they retire from membership in the society, either by death or removal by the Sister Superior, or otherwise, their membership in the corporation automatically ends. To be eligible for membership in the order, she must be of the Catholic faith, and for membership in the corporation she must be selected for that responsibility by the Sister Superior at St. Louis. They must report to and receive their instructions from the Sister Superior of the "Central House" at St....

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 practice notes
  • Schultz v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Newark
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New Jersey)
    • March 19, 1984
    ...see, e.g., Carver Chiropractic College v. Armstrong, 103 Okl. 123, 229 P. 641 (1924); Texas, see, e.g., Barnes v. Providence Sanatarium, 229 S.W. 588 (Tex.Civ.App., 1921) and Virginia, see, e.g., Weston's Adminix. v. Hospital of St. Vincent of Paul, 131 Va. 587, 107 S.E. 785...
  • Sessions v. Thomas D. Dee Memorial Hospital Ass'n, 5907
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Utah
    • April 25, 1938
    ...251 S.W. 775; Texas: St. Paul's Sanitarium v. Williamson, Tex. Civ. App., 164 S.W. 36; Barnes v. Providence Sanitarium, Tex. Civ. App., 229 S.W. 588; Baylor University v. Boyd, Tex. Civ. App., 18 S.W.2d 700; Steele v. St. Joseph's Hospital, [94 Utah 489] Tex. Civ. App. 60 S.W.2d 1083; City ......
  • Isaacson v. Husson College
    • United States
    • Supreme Judicial Court of Maine (US)
    • November 14, 1972
    ...charitable immunity, like that of governmental immunity, is an affirmative defense. Barnes v. Providence Sanitarium, 1921, Tex.Civ.App., 229 S.W. 588; Pikeville Methodist Hospital v. Donahoo, 1927, 221 Ky. 538, 299 S.W. 159; White v. Central Dispensary and Emergency Hospital, 1938, 69 App.D......
  • St. Vincent's Hosp. v. Stine, No. 24077.
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • June 26, 1924
    ...Ass'n, supra; New England Sanitarium v. Inhabitants, 205 Mass. 335, 91 N. E. 385;Barnes v. Providence Sanitarium (Tex. Civ. App.) 229 S. W. 588;Bishop Randall Hospital v. Hartley, 24 Wyo. 408, 160 Pac. 385, Ann. Cas. 1918E, 1172. [3] Is such a charitable institution liable to a beneficiary ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
19 cases
  • Schultz v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Newark
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New Jersey)
    • March 19, 1984
    ...see, e.g., Carver Chiropractic College v. Armstrong, 103 Okl. 123, 229 P. 641 (1924); Texas, see, e.g., Barnes v. Providence Sanatarium, 229 S.W. 588 (Tex.Civ.App., 1921) and Virginia, see, e.g., Weston's Adminix. v. Hospital of St. Vincent of Paul, 131 Va. 587, 107 S.E. 785...
  • Sessions v. Thomas D. Dee Memorial Hospital Ass'n, 5907
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Utah
    • April 25, 1938
    ...251 S.W. 775; Texas: St. Paul's Sanitarium v. Williamson, Tex. Civ. App., 164 S.W. 36; Barnes v. Providence Sanitarium, Tex. Civ. App., 229 S.W. 588; Baylor University v. Boyd, Tex. Civ. App., 18 S.W.2d 700; Steele v. St. Joseph's Hospital, [94 Utah 489] Tex. Civ. App. 60 S.W.2d 1083; City ......
  • Isaacson v. Husson College
    • United States
    • Supreme Judicial Court of Maine (US)
    • November 14, 1972
    ...charitable immunity, like that of governmental immunity, is an affirmative defense. Barnes v. Providence Sanitarium, 1921, Tex.Civ.App., 229 S.W. 588; Pikeville Methodist Hospital v. Donahoo, 1927, 221 Ky. 538, 299 S.W. 159; White v. Central Dispensary and Emergency Hospital, 1938, 69 App.D......
  • St. Vincent's Hosp. v. Stine, No. 24077.
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • June 26, 1924
    ...Ass'n, supra; New England Sanitarium v. Inhabitants, 205 Mass. 335, 91 N. E. 385;Barnes v. Providence Sanitarium (Tex. Civ. App.) 229 S. W. 588;Bishop Randall Hospital v. Hartley, 24 Wyo. 408, 160 Pac. 385, Ann. Cas. 1918E, 1172. [3] Is such a charitable institution liable to a beneficiary ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT