Barnes v. State

Decision Date27 March 1957
Citation93 So.2d 863
PartiesRay BARNES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

J. Lewis Hall, Tallahassee, Strayhorn & Strayhorn, Fort Myers, and Farr & Fair, Punta Gorda, for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Jack A. Sudduth, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

ROBERTS, Justice.

Appellant Barnes was convicted of assault with intent to murder one Bill Piper and has appealed from the judgment of conviction. The controlling issue on this appeal is the propriety of the trial judge's refusal to give a charge to the jury requested by the appellant.

Barnes, a state wildlife officer, agreed to help Bill Piper hunt some wild hogs on Piper's pasture. An altercation developed at the pasture among Barnes, Bill Piper, and Piper's nephew, David. In the ensuing fight, Barnes was beaten and kicked by his opponents and his pistol was taken away from him by Bill Piper. Barnes retired from the scene with a cracked rib and other injuries and went back to his home in town. After patching up his wounds, he took his shotgun and obtained some shells for it at the hardware store, telling the clerk he was going to kill an alligator. He then drove back in the general direction of Piper's pasture, and on the way met one Fred Wilsky who told him that he had heard some shooting in the area and thought someone might be shooting a deer or turkey out of season. David Piper and another young man in David's jeep met Barnes on the road and turned around and went back to tell Bill Piper, who was following in his own jeep, that Barnes was coming down the road. Bill Piper continued on down the road and stopped when he saw Barnes parked on the side of the road. Both men got out of their vehicles, Barnes with his shotgun in his hand and Piper with Barnes' pistol. Barnes was apparently the first one to get out of his car. According to Piper's testimony he fired the pistol in the air to see if it had any shells in it and then shot Barnes in the leg when Barnes didn't stop as requested by Piper. At this point, Barnes fired at Piper and hit him in the leg. He then fired another shot and hit him in the neck.

The theory of Barnes' defense was that he was going about his usual business as a wildlife officer when the second altercation occurred, not only to shoot the alligator which someone had reported to him was in the area but also to investigate the shots that had been reported to him by state witness Wilsky; and that he had acted in self-defense when he shot Piper during the second altercation.

The trial judge's charge to the jury on the law of self-defense included a charge that if a man is in combat and after having retired therefrom returns to the scene for the purpose...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Calloway v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • January 26, 2017
    ...Knowles v. State , 632 So.2d 62, 65–66 (Fla. 1993) ; Page v. State , 733 So.2d 1079, 1080–81 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (citing Barnes v. State , 93 So.2d 863 (Fla. 1957) ). Testimony from a police officer about the credibility of another witness may be particularly harmful because a jury may gran......
  • Chamberlain v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • June 17, 2004
    ...in our system of jurisprudence than that which makes the jury the sole arbiter of the credibility of the witnesses," Barnes v. State, 93 So.2d 863, 864 (Fla.1957), we are not persuaded by Chamberlain's argument that the instruction to disregard was insufficient in this case. First, defense ......
  • Kocaker v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • January 3, 2013
    ...with all had significant credibility issues, it is the jury's duty to determine the credibility of trial witnesses. See Barnes v. State, 93 So.2d 863, 864 (Fla.1957) (“[T]here [is no] legal principle more firmly established in our system of jurisprudence than that which makes the jury the s......
  • Boatwright v. State, 82-2033
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 18, 1984
    ...reasons. It is elemental in our system of jurisprudence that the jury is the sole arbiter of the credibility of witnesses. Barnes v. State, 93 So.2d 863 (Fla.1957). Thus, it is an invasion of the jury's exclusive province for one witness to offer his personal view on the credibility of a fe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT