Barnett v. Destiny Owners Ass'n, Inc.

Decision Date17 October 2003
Docket NumberNo. 1D02-3179.,1D02-3179.
Citation856 So.2d 1090
PartiesRobert BARNETT, and Diane Barnett, Robert Stover, and Pamela Stover, Joel Kurasch, and Virginia Kurasch, Jack and Diane Butz, Kumar Amaraneni, and Marcia Amaraneni, Appellants, v. DESTINY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Amy A. Perry and David B. Pleat of Pleat & Perry, P.A., Destin, for Appellants.

Jean Frances Niven of Vernis & Bowling of Northwest Florida, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellee.

VAN NORTWICK, J.

Appellants, homeowners in a planned unit development located in Destin, Florida, appeal a final declaratory judgment rendered in favor of appellee, Destiny Owners Association, Inc. (Association) in their action seeking to invalidate an amendment to the Association's bylaws which prohibits Destiny homeowners from leasing their houses for a term less than six months. In upholding the amendment, the trial court determined that section 8.1(b) of the Association's Declaration of Easements, Covenants and Restrictions unambiguously permitted the Association to amend the bylaws to restrict appellants from engaging in short-term rentals of their property. Among other things, appellants argue that the provision in section 8.1(b) relating to leasing was ambiguous and the trial court erred in ruling that the provision was unambiguous and in excluding parol evidence as to its meaning. We agree and reverse.

Article 8 of the Declaration, governing "Use of Property," contains provisions both protecting and restricting the homeowner's use of their property, including section 8.1(b), which provides that:

Residential Use: Each Parcel shall be used, improved and devoted exclusively to single family residential use, and for no commercial purpose. No time-share ownership of Parcels is permitted without Declarant's approval. Nothing herein shall be deemed to prevent the Owner from leasing a House, subject to all of the provisions of the Declaration, Articles and Bylaws.

The Association argued below, and the trial court agreed, that the last clause in this provision "subject to all of the provisions of the Declaration, Articles and By-laws" allows the Association to amend the bylaws restricting lease terms to a six-month minimum. By a vote of five to two, the Board of Directors of the Association amended the bylaws to provide:

Leasing of Property. The lease or rental of any dwelling or structure within the Property for a period of less than six (6) consecutive months is prohibited. All leases of dwellings or structures within the Property shall be in writing and a copy of such lease shall be provided to the Secretary of the Association or the managing agent of the Association.

However, section 10.10 of the Declaration sets forth the procedure for amending the provisions of the Declaration. Specifically, it provides, in pertinent part:

Section 10.10 Amendment. This Declaration may be amended at any time by an instrument signed by the President or Vice President and Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the [Association] certifying that such an amendment has been adopted by Owners holding seventy-five percent (75%) of the total voting power in the [Association] with respect to the Property, either in person or by proxy at a duly called meeting, or by written consent without meeting in a manner permitted by law ...

In construing section 8.1(b) we are required to look at...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • American Quick Sign, Inc. v. Reinhardt
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 8, 2005
    ...more than one interpretation. See Friedman v. Virginia Metal Prods. Corp., 56 So.2d 515, 517 (Fla.1952); Barnett v. Destiny Owners Ass'n, Inc., 856 So.2d 1090, 1092 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) ("Language in a document is ambiguous when it is uncertain in meaning and may be fairly understood in more......
  • Nourachi v. U.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Florida
    • April 23, 2009
    ...created. See American Quick Sign, Inc. v. Reinhardt, 899 So.2d 461, 465 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). See also Barnett v. Destiny Owners Ass'n, Inc., 856 So.2d 1090, 1092 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) ("Language in a document is ambiguous when it is uncertain in meaning and may be fairly understood in more wa......
  • Ohio Nat'l Life Assurance Corp. v. Jones
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida
    • May 7, 2013
    ...be fairly understood in more ways than one and is susceptible of interpretation inopposite ways." Barnett v. Destiny Owners Ass'n, Inc., 856 So. 2d 1090, 1092 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003). "Where the terms are unambiguous, the parties' intent must be discerned from the four corners of the doc......
  • Circuitronix, LLC v. Kapoor
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida
    • February 21, 2020
    ...to show the intent of the parties when the contract was drafted.") (internal citations omitted); Barnett v. Destiny Owners Ass'n, Inc. , 856 So. 2d 1090, 1092 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) ("If the contract is ambiguous, the trial court should construe the contract and consider parol evidence to dete......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT