Bates v. General Steel Tank Co.
| Decision Date | 23 November 1951 |
| Docket Number | 7 Div. 140 |
| Citation | 55 So.2d 218,256 Ala. 466 |
| Parties | BATES v. GENERAL STEEL TANK CO. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Young & Young, Anniston, for petitioner.
Walter J. Merrill and Knox, Jones, Woolf & Merrill, all of Anniston, opposed.
This is a petition by W. O. Bates for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the case of Bates v. General Steel Tank Company, Ala.Sup., 55 So.2d 213, a corporation.
The petition is dismissed for failure to comply with the rule of this court requiring such petition to be presented on transcript paper. Rules of Practice in Supreme Court, rule 36, Code 1940, Title 7, Appendix; Maddox v. City of Birmingham, 255 Ala. 440, 52 So.2d 166; Nix v. State, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 456; Barnett v. Pattillo, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 451; Anderson v. State, 251 Ala. 32, 36 So.2d 244; Farley v. State, 251 Ala. 391, 37 So.2d 440; Johns v. Thomas H. Vaughn & Co., 251 Ala. 489, 38 So.2d 21; Haney v. State, 250 Ala. 664, 36 So.2d 117; Allen v. State, 249 Ala. 201, 30 So.2d 483; Peterson v. State, 248 Ala. 179, 27 So.2d 30. See Ex parte Wood, 215 Ala. 280, 110 So. 409.
Petition dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Boone v. Mullendore
... ... Bates v. General Steel Tank Co., 36 Ala.App. 261, 55 So.2d 213, cert. dismissed, ... ...
-
Duckett v. State
...7, Appendix, and we have no alternative but to strike it. So ordered. Stovall v. Stovall, Ala.Sup., 57 So.2d 641; Bates v. General Steel Tank Co., 256 Ala. 466, 55 So.2d 218; Maddox v. City of Birmingham, 255 Ala. 440, 52 So.2d 166; Nix v. State, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 456; Barnett v. Patillo......
-
Hochman v. State, 1 Div. 700
...Title 7, Appendix. Duckett v. State, 257 Ala. 589, 60 So.2d 357; Stovall v. State, 257 Ala. 116, 57 So.2d 641; Bates v. General Steel Tank Co., 256 Ala. 466, 55 So.2d 218; Maddox v. City of Birmingham, 255 Ala. 440, 52 So.2d 166; Nix v. State, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 456; Barnett v. Patillo, 2......
-
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Korneghy
...it. It is so ordered. Duckett v. State, 257 Ala. 589, 60 So.2d 357; Stovall v. State, 257 Ala. 116, 57 So.2d 641; Bates v. General Steel Tank Co., 256 Ala. 466, 55 So.2d 218; Maddox v. City of Birmingham, 255 Ala. 440, 52 So.2d 166; Nix v. State, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 456; Barnett v. Patillo......