Baumgartner v. Baumgartner

Decision Date02 May 1997
Docket NumberNo. 96-03101,96-03101
Citation693 So.2d 84
Parties22 Fla. L. Weekly D1093 Carl Peter BAUMGARTNER, Appellant, v. Sibylle BAUMGARTNER, on Behalf of minor children, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

David F. Garber of Garber & Jay, P.A., Naples, for Appellant.

Victoria M. Ho of Asbell, Coleman & Ho, P.A., Naples, for Appellee.

ALTENBERND, Acting Chief Judge.

Carl Peter Baumgartner appeals the trial court's "Judgment of Attorney's Fees" entered in an action to obtain an injunction for protection against domestic violence pursuant to section 741.30, Florida Statutes (1995). Recently, this court affirmed the basic injunction, but reversed portions of the injunction that interfered with a German court's authority to resolve child custody issues. Baumgartner v. Baumgartner, 691 So.2d 488 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). We now reverse the award of attorneys' fees because neither section 741.30 nor chapter 61, Florida Statutes (1995), provides a basis for the fees in this case.

As explained in our prior opinion, Mr. Baumgartner and Sibylle Baumgartner are German citizens who had a pending German divorce and custody action when they separately came to Florida on a short vacation in April 1996. The couple had a domestic altercation on April 3, 1996, over who would use their condominium and who would have custody of the children during this vacation. As a result of the altercation, on April 4, 1996, Mrs. Baumgartner petitioned for an injunction for protection against domestic violence pursuant to section 741.30. The trial court entered a temporary injunction on that date. After an evidentiary hearing, a permanent injunction was entered on May 6, 1996.

Mrs. Baumgartner filed her petition on the standard printed form with handwritten entries. The petition does not request attorneys' fees. Although her lawyers' time records reflect that they helped her fill out the various forms needed to obtain this injunction, they did not make an appearance on her behalf when the petition was filed. 1 They first appear in subsequent pleadings. Apparently, they made an oral motion for fees prior to the conclusion of an evidentiary hearing on April 30, 1996. The trial judge reserved ruling on attorneys' fees at that hearing. On May 6, Mrs. Baumgartner's attorneys filed their motion for fees. After a hearing in June, the trial court entered its final judgment solely for the purpose of awarding Mrs. Baumgartner attorneys' fees in the amount of $7,972.62.

The cause of action created in section 741.30 does not provide for an award of attorneys' fees. Moreover, the statute clearly contemplates a streamlined pro se proceeding. It expressly mandates that clerks of court shall "assist" the petitioners in seeking the injunction. § 741.30(2)(c), Fla.Stat. (1995). Standardized forms are utilized, and the clerks of court are trained to provide "effective assistance." § 741.30(2)(c)(6), Fla.Stat. (1995). By contrast, if a petitioner needs additional judicial protection after a violation of such an injunction, then the statute provides for an award of economic damages, including "costs and attorneys' fees." § 741.31, Fla.Stat. (1995).

Mrs. Baumgartner's attorneys recognize the general rule that an award of attorneys' fees is in derogation of the common law and is allowed only when provided for by contract or statute. See Rivera v. Deauville Hotel, 277 So.2d 265 (Fla.1973). They argue that an award of attorneys' fees is justified because this statutory cause of action is similar to a divorce proceeding and can be equated with an award of support. They cite cases in which awards have been allowed in annulments, Gilvary v. Gilvary, 648 So.2d 317 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), custody and paternity actions, Marino & Goodman, P.A. v. Chapman, 561 So.2d 1318 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), Hornsby v. Newman, 444 So.2d 90 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), and modifications of child support in paternity disputes, P.A.G. v. A.F., 602 So.2d 1259 (Fla.1992). We conclude that those cases are distinguishable because the cause of action created by section 741.30 is utilized in many situations which either do not or cannot result in a divorce proceeding under chapter 61. The statutory domestic violence injunction is not designed or intended to resolve the complex family issues determined in divorce, paternity, or annulment proceedings.

We are not...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Hall v. Lopez
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 28, 2016
    ...against domestic violence, § 741.30, Fla. Stat. (2011), does not provide for an award of attorney's fees") (citing Baumgartner v. Baumgartner, 693 So.2d 84 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), and Belmont v. Belmont, 761 So.2d 406 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) ); Geiger v. Schrader, 926 So.2d 432, 433 (Fla. 1st DCA 20......
  • Bane v. Bane
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • November 22, 2000
    ...4. The former husband has brought to our attention Belmont v. Belmont, 761 So.2d 406 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), and Baumgartner v. Baumgartner, 693 So.2d 84 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), in which the Second District held that attorney's fees could not be awarded in a domestic violence injunction case. The F......
  • Dudley v. Schmidt
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 10, 2007
    ...Abraham v. Abraham, 700 So.2d 421 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), Lewis v. Lewis, 689 So.2d 1271 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), and Baumgartner v. Baumgartner, 693 So.2d 84 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)). See also Ratigan v. Stone, 947 So.2d 607, 608 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (holding trial court erred in awarding attorney's fees......
  • Ratigan v. Stone
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 10, 2007
    ...See Belmont v. Belmont, 761 So.2d 406 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Abraham v. Abraham, 700 So.2d 421 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Baumgartner v. Baumgartner, 693 So.2d 84 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Lewis v. Lewis, 689 So.2d 1271 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Therefore, we reverse the award of attorneys fees award as sanctio......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Procedural remedies
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Florida Causes of Action
    • April 1, 2022
    ...the victim of any act of domestic violence. Baumgartner v. Baumgartner , 691 So.2d 488, 489 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), appeal after remand , 693 So.2d 84 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). 4. Evidence: In the absence of a clear stipulation of counsel, argument of counsel alone does not constitute evidence from w......
  • Domestic violence
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Florida Family Law and Practice - Volume 1
    • April 30, 2022
    ...case law; the intent of the procedural changes seem to emphasize ease of use by self-represented litigants. [ Baumgartner v. Baumgartner, 693 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)(statute clearly contemplates streamlined self-represented proceeding; it expressly mandates that clerks of court must a......
  • Florida family law rules of procedure
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Florida Family Law Trial Notebook
    • April 30, 2022
    ...for the award of attorney’s fees in action to secure injunction for protection against domestic violence. Baumgartner v. Baumgartner , 693 So.2d 84 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Guida v. Guida Since there was no request for injunction made in the pleadings and there was no evidence of waiver, the tri......
  • Florida's four orders of protection against violence: distinguishing the difference.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 77 No. 11, December 2003
    • December 1, 2003
    ...Cisneros v. Cisneros, 831 So. 2d (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 2002); Lewis v. Lewis, 689 So. 2d (Fla. let D.C.A. 1997); Baumgartner v. Baumgartner, 693 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1997); Belmont v. Belmont, 761 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 2000). (25) FLA. SWAT. [section] 741.30(1)(c). (26) Farr v. Farr, 84......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT