Baxley v. Hakiel Industries, Inc.
Decision Date | 25 June 2007 |
Docket Number | No. S06G1899.,S06G1899. |
Citation | 647 S.E.2d 29,282 Ga. 312 |
Parties | BAXLEY v. HAKIEL INDUSTRIES, INC. et al. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Thomas William Malone, Malone Law Offices, Stuart Bradley Houck, Frank Anthony Ilardi, Houck & Ilardi, Atlanta, GA, for Appellant.
Frederick M. Valz III, Ambadas B. Joshi, Bryce William Mowbray III, Carlock, Copeland, Semler & Stair, LLP; Terrell William Benton III, Jack G. Slover, Jr., Hall, Booth, Smith & Slover, P.C.; Thomas E. Magill, Laura Denise Tubbs, Magill & Atkinson, LLP; Del Percilla, Jr., Law Offices of Del Percilla, Jr., Atlanta, GA, for Appellees.
After consuming alcohol at Brewsters and The Place, Mary Karafiat was involved in an automobile accident with motorcyclist Marcus Dwayne Baxley, who was seriously injured. Brewsters's manager learned of the accident that night and of Karafiat's involvement the next day. Knowing that Karafiat, a "somewhat" regular customer, had been at Brewsters prior to the accident, the manager questioned her staff as to what Karafiat had been served. Brewsters had three video cameras in operation on the premises, but the tape from the date of the accident was reused and recorded over after four days, in the regular course of business.
Baxley's guardian filed suit against Karafiat; Hakiel Industries, Inc. d/b/a "Brewsters"; and Behnamiri & Assoc., LLC d/b/a "The Place." The trial court granted summary judgment to the owners of Brewsters and The Place on Baxley's claims brought pursuant to the Georgia Dram Shop Act, OCGA § 51-1-40(b), noting that although there was an issue of fact regarding whether Karafiat was noticeably intoxicated when served alcohol, there was an absence of a triable issue regarding these defendants' constructive knowledge that Karafiat would soon be driving. The Court of Appeals affirmed in Baxley v. Hakiel Indus., 280 Ga.App. 94, 633 S.E.2d 360 (2006). We granted certiorari to consider whether a spoliation presumption should have been applied to the claims against Brewsters due to the destruction of the videotaped material from the night of the accident.1 See id. at 95(1), 633 S.E.2d 360.
"`Spoliation refers to the destruction or failure to preserve evidence that is necessary to contemplated or pending litigation.'" (Footnote omitted.) Bouvé & Mohr, LLC v. Banks, 274 Ga.App. 758, 762(1), 618 S.E.2d 650 (2005). Such conduct "`creates the presumption that the evidence would have been harmful to the spoliator.'" (Footnote omitted.) American Multi-Cinema, Inc. v. Walker, 270 Ga.App. 314, 317(2)(b), 605 S.E.2d 850 (2004). See also OCGA § 24-4-22. Proof of spoliation raises Lane v. Montgomery Elevator Co., 225 Ga.App. 523, 525, 484 S.E.2d 249 (1997). Compare Sharpnack v. Hoffinger Indus., Inc., 231 Ga.App. 829, 831, 499 S.E.2d 363 (1998) ( ).
There was proof of spoliation here, as...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Phillips
...by letter from plaintiff's attorney attempting to settle and avoid litigation). Moreover, we do not believe that Baxley v. Hakiel Indus., Inc., 282 Ga. 312, 647 S.E.2d 29 (2007) mandates a finding of spoliation here. In Baxley, our Supreme Court found proof of spoliation, after the bar mana......
-
Whitfield v. Tequila Mexican Rest. No. 1.
...into death did not trigger duty to preserve video for civil defendants). And we find Whitfield's reliance on Baxley v. Hakiel Indus., 282 Ga. 312, 647 S.E.2d 29 (2007), to be misplaced. Baxley involved the destruction of video evidence after an internal investigation was conducted by the de......
-
Craig v. Bailey Bros. Realty Inc
...gave them any notice that he was contemplating litigation during that conversation. 2. The father's reliance upon Baxley v. Hakiel Indus., 282 Ga. 312, 647 S.E.2d 29 (2007), is misplaced. That case involved a business defendant's destruction of a video recording of pertinent events followin......
-
Phillips v. Harmon
...spoliation. Phillips, 328 Ga.App. at 699 –700(2), 760 S.E.2d 235. It also concluded that this Court's decision in Baxley v. Hakiel Indus., 282 Ga. 312, 647 S.E.2d 29 (2007), as further discussed in Silman v. Assoc. Bellemeade, supra at 28, 685 S.E.2d 277, did not mandate a finding of spolia......