Baycon Industries, Inc. v. Shea, 97-04589
| Decision Date | 26 June 1998 |
| Docket Number | No. 97-04589,97-04589 |
| Parties | 23 Fla. L. Weekly D1552 BAYCON INDUSTRIES, INC. Appellant, v. J. Michael SHEA, individually, and Shea & Associates, P.A., Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Laurin E. Bryant of Black & Jung, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.
Ronald R. Bidwell, Tampa; J. Michael Shea of Shea & Associates, P.A., Tampa, for Appellees.
Appellant, Baycon Industries, Inc., timely presents two issues, one of which requires reversal and remand.
Baycon Industries, Inc., filed an unsworn professional legal malpractice complaint against J. Michael Shea, and Shea & Associates, P.A., in response to which Shea filed an unsworn motion to dismiss contesting Baycon's standing to bring the suit. The motion to dismiss had attached to it several documents relating to an earlier bankruptcy proceeding involving Baycon as the debtor and a sale or discharge of the underlying claim by Baycon for which Shea is being brought to task.
The trial court treated these pleadings in the fashion of a summary judgment proceeding, thereby depriving both parties of traditional procedural opportunities provided by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510. The court dismissed the complaint, based upon documents attached to the motion to dismiss.
We are unable to conclude whether the error is harmless and therefore remand for further proceedings. A motion to dismiss is not a substitute for a motion for summary judgment, and in ruling on a motion to dismiss a complaint the trial court is confined to consideration of the allegations found within the four corners of the complaint. See Thompson v. Martin, 530 So.2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).
Reversed and remanded.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Univ. of S. Fla. Bd. of Trs. v. Moore
...the four corners of the complaint." Hurley v. Lifsey , 310 So. 3d 1030, 1032-33 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020) (quoting Baycon Indus., Inc. v. Shea , 714 So. 2d 1094, 1095 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) ). Consequently, at this stage of the pleadings, the trial court was required to treat as true the complaint's a......
-
Enlow v. E.C. Scott Wright, P.A.
...850 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (citing Atkins v. Topp Telecom, Inc., 873 So.2d 397, 399 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) ); accord Baycon Indus., Inc. v. Shea, 714 So.2d 1094, 1095 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (citing Thompson v. Martin, 530 So.2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) ). Moreover, the attachment of documents to the mo......
-
Gualtieri v. Bogle
...S. Fla. Bd. of Trs. v. Moore , No. 2D21-2685, 2022 WL 1751166, at *1 (Fla. 2d DCA June 1, 2022) ; see also Baycon Indus., Inc. v. Shea , 714 So. 2d 1094, 1095 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) ("A motion to dismiss is not a substitute for a motion for summary judgment, and in ruling on a motion to dismiss......
-
Howard v. Greenwich Ins. Co.
...in their pleadings.(quoting Holland v. Anheuser Busch, Inc., 643 So.2d 621, 623–24 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) ); Baycon Indus., Inc. v. Shea, 714 So. 2d 1094, 1095 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (holding the trial court, by treating the proceedings as a summary judgment, both parties were deprived of tradition......
-
1-2 Complaint
...complaint need only indicate that a cause of action exists and need not anticipate affirmative defenses); Baycon Indus., Inc. v. Shea, 714 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 2d Dist. Ct. App. 1998).[11] Ingram v. Butter, 2015 WL 672298 (S.D. Fla.) (dismissing convoluted 189-page complaint but granting plain......