Beacon Medical Products v. Travelers Cas.

Decision Date09 July 2008
Docket NumberNo. A08A0618.,A08A0618.
Citation292 Ga.App. 617,665 S.E.2d 710
PartiesBEACON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, LLC v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA et al.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Adorno & Yoss, Stephen G. Lowe, Atlanta, for appellant.

Miles & Tallant, Dana B. Miles, Atlanta and Kevin J. Tallant, Cumming, for appellees.

BERNES, Judge.

In this action on a materialman's lien discharge bond, appellant Beacon Medical Products, LLC d/b/a Beacon Medaes sought to recover payments from appellees Mallory & Evans, Inc. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America for materials Beacon supplied to the Emory Johns Creek Hospital project. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The trial court denied Beacon's motion and granted summary judgment in favor of appellees, ruling that the materialman's lien was unenforceable because Beacon failed to perfect it by sending a Notice to Contractor pursuant to OCGA § 44-14-361.5(a). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

"Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56(c)." Matjoulis v. Integon Gen. Ins. Corp., 226 Ga.App. 459(1), 486 S.E.2d 684 (1997). On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, we apply a de novo standard of review. Id.

The evidence in this case shows that the general contractor began work on the project on February 1, 2005. The general contractor, however, did not file a Notice of Commencement until May 13, 2005.

Several subcontractors were hired for the project, one of which ordered and received construction materials from Beacon. Beacon delivered its final provision of materials for the project on February 22, 2006, and submitted invoices for the items delivered. Although some of the invoices were paid, an unpaid balance of $139,141.80 remained.

Beacon filed a claim of lien on the project for the unpaid balance owed for its materials. Mallory & Evans, Inc., one of the subcontractors on the project, purchased a lien discharge bond from Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America as substitute security for Beacon's lien claim. When payment was not provided, Beacon filed the instant lawsuit, asserting a claim against the lien discharge bond.

The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Appellees asserted that Beacon was not entitled to payment because it failed to perfect its lien by providing a Notice to Contractor as required by OCGA § 44-14-361.5(a). Beacon, however, asserted that its duty to give a Notice to Contractor was obviated because the general contractor had failed to timely file a Notice of Commencement as required by OCGA § 44-14-361.5(b).1 Rejecting Beacon's argument, the trial court concluded that the notice requirements were satisfied in this case since the Notice of Commencement was filed prior to Beacon's provision of materials for the project. Consequently, the trial court ruled that Beacon's duty to give a Notice to Contractor had been triggered and that its failure to do so invalidated its lien as a matter of law. Beacon now appeals.

The issue in this appeal requires us to interpret the interplay among OCGA § 44-14-361.5(a), (b) and (d). In doing so, we are mindful that the "golden rule" of statutory construction requires that "we follow the literal language of the statute unless doing so produces contradiction, absurdity or such an inconvenience as to insure that the legislature meant something else." (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. Coweta County, 288 Ga.App. 748, 749, 655 S.E.2d 346 (2007). If the statutory language is plain and does not lead to absurd results, we must construe the statute according to its terms without further inquiry. See City of Atlanta v. Miller, 256 Ga. App. 819, 820(1), 569 S.E.2d 907 (2002). Moreover, "in construing language in any one part of a statute, a court should consider the entire scheme of the statute and attempt to gather the legislative intent from the statute as a whole." (Citation omitted.) Footstar v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 281 Ga. 448, 450, 637 S.E.2d 692 (2006).

Additionally, "lien statutes in derogation of the common law must be strictly construed in favor of the property owner and against the materialman." Roofing Supply of Atlanta v. Forrest Homes, 279 Ga.App. 504, 506(1), 632 S.E.2d 161 (2006). See also Calhoun/Johnson Co. v. Houston Family Trust No. 1, 236 Ga.App. 793, 794-795, 513 S.E.2d 759 (1999). Although appellees were not the property owners in this case, they provided a lien discharge bond as substitute security for the lien, and, therefore, stood in the place of the property owner in defending against the lien. See M. Shapiro & Son, Inc. v. Yates Constr. Co. of Southeast, 140 Ga. App. 675, 678-679, 231 S.E.2d 497 (1976).

With these principles in mind, we turn to the statutory provisions at issue. OCGA § 44-14-361.5(a), (b) and (d) provide in part:

(a) To make good the liens specified in paragraphs (1), (2), and (6) through (9) of subsection (a) of Code Section 44-14-361, any person having a right to a lien who does not have privity of contract with the contractor and is providing labor, services, or materials for the improvement of property shall, within 30 days from the filing of the Notice of Commencement or 30 days following the first delivery of labor, services, or materials to the property, whichever is later, give a written Notice to Contractor as set out in subsection (c) of this Code section to the owner or the agent of the owner and to the contractor for a project on which there has been filed with the clerk of the superior court a Notice of Commencement setting forth therein the information required in subsection (b) of this Code section.

(b) Not later than 15 days after the contractor physically commences work on the property, a Notice of Commencement shall be filed by the owner, the agent of the owner, or by the contractor with the clerk of the superior court in the county in which the project is located. A copy of the Notice of Commencement shall be posted on the project site. The Notice of Commencement shall include:

(1) The name, address, and telephone number of the contractor;

(2) The name and location of the project being constructed and the legal description of the property upon which the improvements are being made;

(3) The name and address of the true owner of the property;

(4) The name and address of the person other than the owner at whose instance the improvements are being made, if not the true owner of the property;

(5) The name and the address of the surety for the performance and payment bonds, if any; and

(6) The name and address of the construction lender, if any.

The contractor shall be required to give a copy of the Notice of Commencement to any subcontractor, materialman, or person who makes a written request of the contractor. Failure to give a copy of the Notice of Commencement within ten calendar days of receipt of the written request from the subcontractor, materialman, or person shall render the provision of this Code section inapplicable to the subcontractor, materialman, or person making the request.

...

(d) The failure to file a Notice of Commencement shall render the provisions of this Code section inapplicable....

Interpreting these provisions, we have held that the failure to file a Notice of Commencement, or filing a Notice of Commencement containing a fatal defect, relieves a materialman from the duty of providing a Notice to Contractor in order to perfect his lien. See Gen. Elec. Co. v. North Point Ministries, 289 Ga.App. 382, 384, 657 S.E.2d 297 (2008); Consolidated Pipe etc., Co. v. Genoa Constr. Svcs., 279 Ga.App. 894, 896, 633 S.E.2d 59 (2006). Relying upon this case law, Beacon argues that the contractor's failure to timely file a Notice of Commencement in accordance with the 15-day deadline imposed by OCGA § 44-14-361.5(b) amounted to a fatal defect, and that it was thus relieved from the duty to give a Notice to Contractor.

We disagree. While it is true that OCGA § 44-14-361.5(b) requires an owner or contractor to file a Notice of Commencement within 15 days of beginning work on the project, neither subsection (a) nor (d) makes any reference to this time requirement in its provisions. Instead, subsection (a) requires the materialman to give a Notice to Contractor "for a project on which there has been filed with the clerk of the superior court a Notice of Commencement setting forth therein the information required in subsection (b) of this Code section." Significantly, while subsection (a) makes specific reference to the information that must be contained in a Notice of Commencement under subsection (b), it makes no similar reference to the timeliness of filing the Notice of Commencement. Likewise, the plain language of subsection (d) of the statute does not refer to the 15-day deadline or timeliness of the Notice of Commencement. Under these circumstances and "under the rules of statutory construction, the omitted language [from subsections (a) and (d) pertaining to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Barnett v. Fullard
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 17, 2010
    ...to gather the legislative intent from the statute as awhole." (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Beacon Med. Products v. Travelers Cas., etc., 292 Ga.App. 617, 619, 665 S.E.2d 710 (2008). Furthermore, "[a] statute must be construed in relation to other statutes of which it is a part, and a......
  • Hendry v. Hendry
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • November 5, 2012
    ...performance is deemed substantial compliance with the statutory requirements.” Beacon Med. Products v. Travelers Cas. & Surety Co. of America, 292 Ga.App. 617, 621, n. 2, 665 S.E.2d 710 (2008) (citation omitted). Here, we perceive no injury from the delay in Sally presenting her child suppo......
  • CONSOL. PIPE & SUPPLY v. GENOA CONST.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • February 10, 2010
    ...12 OCGA §§ 10-7-31(a)(3) (emphasis supplied); 44-14-361.5(c)(3) (emphasis supplied). 13 Beacon Med. Products v. Travelers Cas. and Surety Co. of America, 292 Ga.App. 617, 622, 665 S.E.2d 710 (2008) (citation 14 J. Kinson Cook, Inc. v. Weaver, 252 Ga.App. 868, 870(1), 556 S.E.2d 831 (2001) (......
  • Ga. Soc'y of Ambulatory Surgery Centers v. Ga. Dep't of Cmty. Health
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 12, 2011
    ...the legislative intent from the statute as a whole.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Beacon Medical Products v. Travelers Cas., etc. of America, 292 Ga.App. 617, 619, 665 S.E.2d 710 (2008). Statutes also should be construed in a manner that gives all of the words meaning. See OCGA § 1–3......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Construction Law
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 69-1, September 2017
    • Invalid date
    ...Se. Culvert, Inc. v. Hardin Bros., LLC, 312 Ga. App. 158, 718 S.E.2d 28 (2011); Beacon Med. Prods., LLC v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co., 292 Ga. App. 617, 665 S.E.2d 710 (2008); Harris Ventures, Inc. v. Mallory & Evans, Inc., 291 Ga. App. 843, 662 S.E.2d 874 (2008); Gen. Elec. Co. v. N. Point ......
  • Construction Law - Frank O. Brown Jr.
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 61-1, September 2009
    • Invalid date
    ...12. Id. 13. 291 Ga. App. 843, 662 S.E.2d 874 (2008). 14. Id. at 843-44, 662 S.E.2d at 874-75. 15. Id. at 845, 662 S.E.2d at 875-76. 16. 292 Ga. App. 617, 665 S.E.2d 710 (2008). 17. Id. at 621, 665 S.E.2d at 713. 18. O.C.G.A. Sec. 44-14-361.5(b). 19. Beacon Medical, 292 Ga. App. at 623, 665 ......
  • Non-privity Lien Rights on Private Construction Projects: the Court of Appeals of Georgia Provides Clarity
    • United States
    • State Bar of Georgia Georgia Bar Journal No. 15-5, February 2010
    • Invalid date
    ...of Commencement setting forth: . . . ." [2] 289 Ga. App. 382, 657 S.E.2d 297 (2008). [3] 291 Ga. App. 843, 662 S.E.2d 874 (2008). [4] 292 Ga. App. 617, 665 S.E.2d 710 (2008). [5] 296 Ga. App. 892, 676 S.E.2d 298 (2009). [6] A factual dispute existed as to whether the Notice of Commencement ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT