Beard v. Beard

Decision Date02 December 2002
Citation751 N.Y.S.2d 304,300 A.D.2d 268
PartiesALEXANDRA BEARD, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>WILLIAM BEARD, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Feuerstein, J.P., Smith, O'Brien and Adams, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the appeal from that part of the order which granted the plaintiff wife's cross motion for leave to enter a judgment for maintenance and support arrears is dismissed, as that part of the order was superseded by the judgment dated August 8, 2001; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

"The party seeking to modify the maintenance provisions of a judgment of divorce in which the terms of a stipulation of settlement have been incorporated but not merged, must demonstrate that the continued enforcement of the party's maintenance obligations would create an `extreme hardship' (Pintus v Pintus, 104 AD2d 866, 867; see also, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b]). With child support, the husband has the burden of establishing an `unanticipated and unreasonable change in circumstances' (Epel v Epel, 139 AD2d 488). Moreover, where the application is one for a downward modification of child support, such a change in circumstances must be `substantial' (see, Nordhauser v Nordhauser, 130 AD2d 561, 562; Matter of Allen v Bowen, 149 AD2d 828, 829)" (Praeger v Praeger, 162 AD2d 671, 673).

Although a parent's loss of employment may constitute a change of circumstances warranting a downward modification where he or she has diligently sought reemployment (see Matter of Meyer v Meyer, 205 AD2d 784), the proper amount of support payable is determined not by a parent's current economic situation, but by a parent's assets and earning powers (see Matter of Fries v Price-Yablin, 209 AD2d 1002; Matter of Fleischmann v Fleischmann, 195 AD2d 604). Thus, downward modification may be denied where the moving party has not made a good-faith effort to obtain employment commensurate with his or her qualifications and experience (see Matter of Yepes v Fichera, 230 AD2d 803).

Although it is undisputed that the defendant husband lost his job as a media salesperson through no fault of his own, the record supports the Supreme Court's determination that he subsequently failed to use his best efforts to obtain employment commensurate with his qualifications and experience (see Matter of Kefeli v Kefeli, 270 AD2d 490; Matter of Dallin v...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Szalapski v. Schwartz, 2003/8830.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 29 Marzo 2011
    ...836 N.Y.S.2d 661 (2d Dep't 2007); Glinski v. Glinski, 199 A.D.2d 994, 606 N.Y.S.2d 468 (4th Dep't 19993). Contra Beard v. Beard, 300 A.D.2d 268, 751 N.Y.S.2d 304 (2d Dep't 2002).11THE REQUIREMENT FOR AN EXPANDED GEOGRAPHIC JOBSEARCH FOR A UNIQUELY QUALIFIED EMPLOYEE Having determined that a......
  • In the Matter of John Karagiannis v. Karagiannis
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 18 Mayo 2010
    ...Matter of Ripa v. Ripa, 61 A.D.3d 766, 877 N.Y.S.2d 383; Schlakman v. Schlakman, 38 A.D.3d 640, 641, 833 N.Y.S.2d 121; Beard v. Beard, 300 A.D.2d 268, 751 N.Y.S.2d 304). The party seeking to modify such child support provisions has the burden of establishing that a modification is warranted......
  • Taylor v. Taylor
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 12 Abril 2011
    ...circumstances sufficient to warrant such a modification ( see Schlakman v. Schlakman, 38 A.D.3d at 641, 833 N.Y.S.2d 121; Beard v. Beard, 300 A.D.2d 268, 751 N.Y.S.2d 304; Matter of Westwater v. Donnelly, 204 A.D.2d at 468, 612 N.Y.S.2d 58; Sofia v. Sofia, 162 A.D.2d at 594, 556 N.Y.S.2d 77......
  • Ashmore v. Ashmore
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 13 Febrero 2014
    ...Freedman v. Pogust, 77 A.D.3d 833, 909 N.Y.S.2d 139;Matter of D'Altilio v. D'Altilio, 14 A.D.3d 701, 789 N.Y.S.2d 270;Beard v. Beard, 300 A.D.2d 268, 269, 751 N.Y.S.2d 304). Thus, a parent seeking downward modification of a child support obligation must submit competent proof that the chang......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT