Bedingfield v. Parkerson, 18828
| Decision Date | 16 February 1955 |
| Docket Number | No. 18828,18828 |
| Citation | 86 S.E.2d 215,211 Ga. 386 |
| Parties | Robert B. BEDINGFIELD et al. v. W. D. PARKERSON et al. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Carl K. Nelson, Nelson & Nelson, Dublin, for plaintiffs in error.
R. M. Daly, Dublin, for defendants in error.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court.
The only assignment of error in the present case is on an order overruling the demurrers of the petitioners to the answer of the defendants. It does not appear that there has been any final judgment in the cause in the trial court. The writ of error is, therefore, prematurely brought to this court, and must be dismissed. Tallent v. Lowry, 177 Ga. 752, 171 S.E. 299; Frankel v. Miami Butterine Co., 185 Ga. 284(2), 194 S.E. 503; Darden v. Roberts, 193 Ga. 637, 19 S.E.2d 270; Rivers v. Hollings-worth, 196 Ga. 708, 27 S.E.2d 330; Sitton v. Evans, 205 Ga. 152, 52 S.E.2d 599.
Writ of error dismissed.
All the Justices concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bedingfield v. Parkerson
...the petition. This is the second appearance of this case in this court, it having been held in the first appearance, Bedingfield v. Parkerson, 211 Ga. 386, 86 S.E.2d 215, that the writ of error was prematurely brought to this court, the petitioners having sought to review as a final judgmen......
- Key v. State, 18826
- McDonald v. Fletcher
-
Lacey v. Mann, 39011
...Bozeman v. Ward-Truitt Co., 141 Ga. 45, 80 S.E. 320. See also Grier v. Grier, 100 Ga.App. 322, 111 S.E. 256; Bedingfield v. Parkerson, 211 Ga. 386, 86 S.E.2d 215; Mavity v. Associates Discount Corp., 211 Ga. 471, 86 S.E.2d Writ of error dismissed. FELTON, C. J., and HALL, J., concur. ...