Bekins Van Lines v. Riley, 13
| Decision Date | 25 November 1929 |
| Docket Number | No. 13,13 |
| Citation | 74 L.Ed. 178,280 U.S. 80,50 S.Ct. 64 |
| Parties | BEKINS VAN LINES, Inc., et al. v. RILEY, State Controller of California |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Messrs. Samuel T. Bush and William Sea, Jr., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.
Messrs. Frank L. Guerena and U. S. Webb, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Appellants, as common carriers, are engaged in transporting freight by motor vehicles for hire along public highways between fixed termini and over regular routes within California. The 1926 amendment to the Constitution and the statutes of that state lay upon such carriers a tax of 5 per cent. of their gross receipts in lieu of all other taxes, while other freight carriers, common and private, by motor vehicles, are subjected to different and, it is alleged, less burdensome taxation. Const. Cal. art. 13, § 15; Act March 5, 1927, chapter 19, Stats. Cal. 1927.
By this proceeding, instituted July 21, 1928, appellants ask that the constitutional amendment and that statute which undertake to lay such tax upon them be declared discriminatory and in conflict with section 1, of the Fourteenth Amendment; also that an injunction issue against the state controller forbidding him from attempting to enforce payment.
Upon motion, without written opinion, the District Court-three judges sitting-dismissed the bill. The cause is here by direct appeal, and the only matter for our determination is the validity of the challenged classification.
The power of a state in respect of classification has often been declared by opinions here. We are unable to say that there was no reasonable basis for the one under consideration; the court below reached the proper result, and its decree must be affirmed.
Appellants voluntarily assumed the position of common carriers operating between fixed termini and enjoy all consequent benefits. That a marked distinction exists between common and private carriers by auto vehicles appears from Frost v. Railroad Commission, 271 U. S. 583, 46 S. Ct. 605, 70 L. Ed. 1101, 47 A. L. R. 457, and Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. Duke, 266 U. S. 570, 45 S. Ct. 191, 69 L. Ed. 445, 36 A. L. R. 1105. Sufficient reasons for placing common carriers, operating as appellants do, in a special class, are pointed out by Raymond v. Holm, 165 Minn. 215, 206 N. W. 166 (Dec. 4, 1925); State v. Le Febvre, 174 Minn. 248, 219 N. W. 167 (April 13, 1928); Iowa...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Paul Gray, Inc. v. Ingels
...between a common carrier operating over regular routes between fixed termini and other carriers (Bekins Van Lines v. Riley, 1929, 280 U.S. 80, 50 S.Ct. 64, 74 L.Ed. 178); an ordinance requiring that persons engaged in the business of letting out automobiles to be driven by others pay a lice......
-
Solberg v. Davenport
...S. 160, 37 S. Ct. 30, 61 L. Ed. 223;Hendrick v. State of Maryland, 235 U. S. 610, 35 S. Ct. 140, 59 L. Ed. 385;Bekins Van Lines v. Riley, 280 U. S. 80, 50 S. Ct. 64, 74 L. Ed. 178;Smith v. Commonwealth, 175 Ky. 286, 194 S. W. 367;Jackson v. Neff, 64 Fla. 326, 60 So. 350;Bozeman v. State, 7 ......
-
Gen. Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Dep't of Pub. Works
...New York ex rel. Bryant v. Zimmerman, 278 U. S. 63, 73-75, 49 S. Ct. 61, 73 L. Ed. 184, 62 A. L. R. 785;Bekins Van Lines, Inc., v. Riley, 280 U. S. 80, 50 S. Ct. 64, 74 L. Ed. 178;State Board of Tax Commissioners of Indiana v. Jackson, 283 U. S. 527, 537-541, 51 S. Ct. 540, 75 L. Ed. 1248, ......
-
General Outdoor Advertising Co., Inc. v. Department of Public Works
... ... hundred and fifty (150) feet from the point where the center ... lines of two or more public ways intersect. This provision ... shall not apply ... 274, 63 L.Ed. 599 ... [289 Mass. 192] ... 13 ... The statute reposes in the department of public works power ... to ... 63, 73-75, 49 ... S.Ct. 61, 73 L.Ed. 184, 62 A.L.R. 785; Bekins Van Lines, ... Inc., v. Riley, 280 U.S. 80, 50 S.Ct. 64, 74 L.Ed. 178; ... ...