Bennett v. State, 55524

Decision Date17 April 1985
Docket NumberNo. 55524,55524
Citation468 So.2d 855
PartiesLeo BENNETT v. STATE of Mississippi.
CourtMississippi Supreme Court

James G. Tucker, III, Cook & Tucker, Bay St. Louis, for appellant.

Edwin Lloyd Pittman, Atty. Gen. by Leyser Q. Morris, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before ROY NOBLE LEE, SULLIVAN and ANDERSON, JJ.

ROY NOBLE LEE, Presiding Justice, for the Court:

Leo Bennett was convicted in the Circuit Court of Hancock County, Mississippi, on a charge of sexual battery upon a four-year-old female child and was sentenced to fifteen (15) years in custody of the Department of Corrections. He has appealed to this Court and assigns one error in the trial below:

The appellant's conviction of sexual battery was based upon insufficient evidence in that the State failed to prove that the alleged victim was a physically helpless person.

The indictment charged that on the eighth day of July, 1982, Bennett did "... commit sexual battery upon a physically helpless person, to-wit: D.J.S., a female child of the age of four (4) years by engaging in sexual penetration with the said D.J.S., to-wit: cunnilingus."

Without setting forth the exact details of the crime, the State's evidence indicates that Mrs. Billie Schmidt and six (6) of her nine (9) children had gone to Kiln, a community several miles north of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi, where Mrs. Schmidt planned to help manage a bar. Bennett lived next door to that building and Mrs. Schmidt had known him for approximately eighteen (18) years. Mrs. Schmidt and her children were camping in a trailer behind the bar, which trailer was without running water and kitchen facilities. Bennett permitted the Schmidts to use the plumbing facilities and kitchen in his residence.

According to Mrs. Schmidt, Bennett came to the bar around 2:00 on the afternoon of July 8, 1982, became intoxicated, and left around 5 p.m. About 6 p.m., the Schmidt children came to the backdoor of the bar. Randy, age fourteen (14) years, who was holding the little 4-year-old child, stated that Bennett had been fooling with her. Mrs. Schmidt noticed red bite marks on the child's chest and shoulders (she had on no top from the waist up). The child was taken to the hospital where she received a thorough physical examination, indicating red markings (passion marks) on her chest and red irritation of the outer and inner vagina. The doctor stated that her findings were consistent with sexual abuse.

Three (3) of the Schmidt children, aged 14, 12 and 10, observed Bennett in the act of sexually abusing the child. The sheriff's office was notified, and Officer Glen Jackson conducted an investigation. According to him, when he arrived at the scene, Bennett was intoxicated. Bennett denied committing the crime.

The thrust of Bennett's argument is that the State failed to prove the four-year-old victim was a physically helpless person. Mississippi Code Annotated Sec. 97-3-95 (Supp.1982), 1 in effect at the time of the incident, provides:

A person is guilty of sexual battery if he or she engages in sexual penetration with:

(a) another person without his or her consent; or

(b) a mentally defective, mentally incapacitated or physically helpless person. [Miss. Laws 1980, Ch. 450, Sec. 1].

Miss. Code Ann. Sec. 97-3-97 (Supp.1984), provides:

(a) "Sexual penetration"...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Cantrell v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • April 22, 1987
    ...under which he was prosecuted, was applied ex post facto according to this Court's notation in a footnote to Bennett v. State, 468 So.2d 855, n. 1 (Miss.1985). There it was said that subsection (c) was not added to the sexual battery provision until 1984. Subsection (c) was added to Sec. 97......
  • Coates v. State, 55,784
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • September 24, 1986
    ...consent. See Gill v. State, 485 So.2d 1047, 1049 (Miss.1986); Hines v. State, 472 So.2d 386, 392 (Miss.1985); Bennett v. State, 468 So.2d 855, 856 (Miss.1985). Indeed, the jury did on May 18, 1984, return a verdict finding Coates guilty as charged in the indictment. Several days later, the ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT