Berry Refining Co. v. Pinsky

Decision Date17 July 1968
Docket Number3642,3640,Nos. 3637,s. 3637
Citation443 P.2d 521
PartiesBERRY REFINING COMPANY, a Corporation, and Roy Rowland, Appellants (Defendants below), Butane Power & Equipment Company, a Corporation, and Marion A. Wales (Defendants below), v. Shirley PINSKY, Appellee (Plaintiff below). BUTANE POWER & EQUIPMENT COMPANY, a Corporation, and Marion A. Wales, Appellants (Defendants below), Berry Refining Company, a Corporation, and Roy Rowland (Defendants below). v. Shirley PINSKY, Appellee (Plaintiff below). Shirley PINSKY, Appellant (Plaintiff below), v. BUTANE POWER & EQUIPMENT COMPANY, a Corporation, and Marion A. Wales, Appellees (Defendants below), Berry Refining Company, a Corporation, and Roy Rowland (Defendants below).
CourtWyoming Supreme Court

Edward E. Murnane of Murane, Bostwick, McDaniel & Scott, Casper, for appellants, Berry Refining Co. and Roy Rowland.

Ernest J. Goppert of Goppert & Fitzstephens, Cody, H. F. Joffe of Scott & Joffe, Worland, Heller & Morris, Chicago, for Shirley Pinsky.

Houston G. Williams of Wehrli & Williams, Casper, for appellants, Butane Power & Equipment Co. and Marion A. Wales.

Before HARNSBERGER, C. J., and GRAY, McINTYRE and PARKER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This litigation culminating in three appeals, Nos. 3637, 3640, and 3642, to be discussed herein consecutively, arose out of an automobile-truck accident occurring on August 7, 1959, about 8:30 p.m. on state secondary (Thermopolis to Cody) highway 120, approximately twenty miles north of Thermopolis. In the area of the accident, the road runs generally north and south. Plaintiff was a passenger in the 1959 Rambler automobile owned by her father, Dr. Pasternak. Several days earlier he had had a flat and the tire had not been repaired. Late on the afternoon of August 7 when the left-front tire of the Rambler went down the car was stopped in the center of the south-bound lane on the west-traveled portion of the 24-foot-wide, two-lane, oiled highway, and the left-front wheel was jacked up and left standing on the jack. Where the Rambler was stopped there was a solid line going up the hill to the south indicating no passing for traffic going southerly uphill toward Thermopolis. The borrow pit on each side of the road was approximately five and one-half feet deep, the width of the shoulder approximately four feet on each side. Dr. Pasternak was driven to Thermopolis by a passing motorist to take the tire for repairs, and his 28-year-old daughter remained in the car during his absence. The Rambler's lights were either turned on before the doctor left or later by his daughter, who at dusk placed a battery-powered lantern on the shoulder of the road ten to fifteen feet from the car with the beam shining a little above its trunk. (After the accident, a highway patrolman following Dr. Pasternak into Thermopolis observed that the right-rear taillight, not broken by the collision as was the left, was quite dirty, and testified that in pulling up behind the Rambler with his headlights on the car it was hard to determine that the taillight was on.) Sometime after dark the doctor returned to the car in a Berry Refining Company truck, driven by Roy Rowland. Shortly after the Berry company truck stopped and let the doctor out, a truck owned by Butane Power & Equipment Company, driven by Marion A. Wales and traveling in a southerly direction toward Thermopolis on the west portion of the highway, ran into the rear of the Rambler, injuring plaintiff, who on October 25, 1962, filed suit for $250,000 against the Butane company, the driver Wales, the Berry company, and the driver Rowland, service being made on the first three but not on Rowland. Following the trial of the case by jury in November 1964, verdict was rendered in favor of the Butane company, Wales, and the Berry company, and plaintiff filed a motion for new trial, which was granted. Thereafter, service was made on Rowland, and on a change of venue the case was again tried to a jury, which rendered a verdict against the Berry company and Rowland in the sum of $50,000 but found in favor of the Butane company and Wales, judgment being thereafter entered in accordance with the verdict for the amount of $40,500 (plaintiff having theretofore received from her father the sum of $9,500 for a covenant not to sue him on any claim arising out of the accident). Subsequently plaintiff moved for a new trial of the matters at issue between her and the Butane company and Wales, but the motion was denied.

The Berry company and its driver Rowland in Case No. 3637 appeal from the final verdict and judgment entered against them and also claim error in the granting of the second trial. In Case No. 3640 the Butane...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Sanelli v. Glenview State Bank
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • July 17, 1985
    ...prior to the effective date of the amendment." (Emphasis added.) (In re Marriage of Cohn (1982), 93 Ill.2d 190, 206, 66 Ill.Dec. 615, 443 P.2d 521.) Since the amendment attempted to validate these judgments, it violated the principle of separation of powers. This is the same defect which we......
  • Kirby Bldg. Systems v. Mineral Explorations Co.
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • August 1, 1985
    ...be given to it, and that if it is sufficient the determination of the trier of fact will not be disturbed." Berry Refining Company v. Pinsky, Wyo., 443 P.2d 521, 523 (1968). The standard by which we review a substantial-evidence question concerning issues pertaining to proof of damages was ......
  • Mellor v. Ten Sleep Cattle Co.
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • May 26, 1976
    ...691; Piner v. Piner, Wyo., 511 P.2d 94, 95; Producers Livestock Marketing Ass'n v. Parker, Wyo., 509 P.2d 345, 347; Berry Refining Company v. Pinsky, Wyo., 443 P.2d 521, 523; Trail Motors v. First National Bank of Laramie, 76 Wyo. 152, 301 P.2d 775, The burden of proving contributory neglig......
  • Cardin v. Morrison-Knudsen
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • November 30, 1979
    ...inference is sufficient to sustain the judgment, we will not disturb the decision of the trier-of-fact. Berry Refining Company v. Pinsky, Wyo., 443 P.2d 521, 523 (1968). See, also, Johnson v. State, Wyo., 562 P.2d 1294, 1297 (1977), quoting from Blakely v. State, Wyo., 542 P.2d 857, 863 (19......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT