Bewers v. American Home Products Corp.

Citation485 N.Y.S.2d 39,64 N.Y.2d 630
Decision Date29 November 1984
Docket NumberNo. 3,No. 2,No. 1,1,2,3
Parties, 474 N.E.2d 247 Gwendoline Brown BEWERS, et al., Appellants, v. AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION, et al., Respondents. (Action) CLIFTON v. AMERICAN HOME. (Action) HOWELLS v. AMERICAN HOME. (Action)
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
John J. Carlino, New York City, for appellants.
OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, order affirmed, without costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division (99 A.D.2d 949, 472 N.Y.S.2d 637 reversing 117 Misc.2d 991, 459 N.Y.S.2d 666) abused its discretion in dismissing the complaints pursuant to CPLR 327.

COOKE, C.J., and JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Cesar v. United Technology of New York
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • February 13, 1990
    ...of the defense of Statute of Limitations. E.g. Bewers v. American Home Products, 99 A.D.2d 949, 472 N.Y.S.2d 637; aff'd. 64 N.Y.2d 630, 485 N.Y.S.2d 39, 474 N.E.2d 247; Hart v. General Motors Corp., 129 A.D.2d 179, 517 N.Y.S.2d 490. What happens when there is such a dismissal and defendant ......
  • Serov v. Kerzner Int'l Resorts, Inc., 162184/2015.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • July 26, 2016
    ...to be located outside New York (see e.g. Bewers v. American Home Products Corp., 99 A.D.2d 949, 472 N.Y.S.2d 637 [1st Dept 1984, aff'd 64 N.Y.2d 630, 485 N.Y.S.2d 39, 474 N.E.2d 247 (mass products liability action in which all plaintiffs, residents of United Kingdom, were injured in England......
  • BSR Fund, S.A. v. Jagannath
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 17, 2020
    ...on forum non conveniens grounds because "[t]he vast majority of witnesses and documentation . . . are in England . . . ."), aff'd, 64 N.Y.2d 630 (1984); Shin- Etsu Chem. Co. v. 3033 ICICI Bank Ltd., 9 A.D.3d 171, 178 (1st Dep't 2004) ("Any witness with personal knowledge of the letter of cr......
  • Emslie v. Recreative Indus., Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 26, 2013
    ...476684, at *2 [S.D.N.Y.]; see also Bewers v. American Home Prods. Corp., 99 A.D.2d 949, 949–950, 472 N.Y.S.2d 637, affd. 64 N.Y.2d 630, 485 N.Y.S.2d 39, 474 N.E.2d 247). We likewise reach that conclusion here, particularly in light of the well-established principle set forth by the United S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT