Bickes v. Travelers' Ins. Co.
| Decision Date | 14 April 1930 |
| Docket Number | 12263. |
| Citation | 87 Colo. 297,287 P. 859 |
| Parties | BICKES v. TRAVELERS' INS. CO. |
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied May 19, 1930.
In Department.
Error to District Court, City and County of Denver; Charles C Sackmann, Judge.
Action by Margaret Bickes against the Travelers' Insurance Company. To review a judgment dismissing the cause, plaintiff brings error.
Reversed.
A. X. Erickson and Emory L. O'Connell, both of Denver, for plaintiff in error.
Frank B. Goudy and Edward L. Wood, both of Denver, for defendant in error.
Margaret Bickes, as beneficiary, sued the Travelers' Insurance Company for $10,000 on an accident insurance policy issued to her husband, Roy W. Bickes. At the close of the plaintiff's evidence the court sustained a motion for a nonsuit and dismissed the case.
Bickes died November 1, 1927. The plaintiff claims, and the defendant denies, that his death resulted from bodily injuries effected through external, violent, and accidental means, within the terms of the policy.
The plaintiff testified that she had known Bickes ten years; that for six years they were husband and wife; that he had splendid health, was never sick, and had no malady to her knowledge; that he was forty-three years of age at the time of his death; that on October 1, 1927, he was in Trinidad Colo., on business and telephoned her from there, saying that he never felt better in his life, was enjoying good business and expected to be home in a few days; that later he phoned, and she could hardly make out what he was talking about, he rambled and talked so loud; that he came home on the 7th or 8th; that his clothes were all mussed and soiled; that he had a bump on his forehead, and both elbows were badly skinned; that he did not recognize her, and was confused about the arrangement of the rooms; that he staggered, and she had to support him as he walked; that she tried to undress him and put him to bed; that a doctor examined him; that she secured a nurse; that Bickes was taken to a hospital; that he kept putting his hand to his head.
Luella Peterson, the nurse, testified that she noticed a bump on Bickes' forehead and that she thinks he had some bruises on his elbows.
Dr. Chase, who was called to the house, testified that Bickes was hard to examine because he was irrational and was not able to answer questions as to where he had been; that he had a small abrasion of the skin on his forehead and bruises or lacerations on his elbow; that the abrasion on the forehead had a probable duration of three or four days prior to October 7, and in the opinion of the witness, was the result of an external cause.
Dr. W. S. Dennis testified that as autopsy physician for Denver he performed an autopsy upon Bickes; that he discovered a meningeal hemorrhage, which, in his opinion, was associated with concussion due to some form of trauma, or injury or violence, and caused the death of Bickes. He also testified that conditions observed by him eliminated as the cause of the hemorrhage certain other causes that sometimes produce such hemorrhages.
Dr. Leo V. Tepley, manager of the hospital, testified that he had Bickes under his care from October 13, to November 1, the day of his death; that Bickes was irrational, did not know where he was, and would talk incoherently; that he was 'semistuporous'; that he was out of his head all the time; that by many tests the witness eliminated as the cause of the meningeal hemorrhage all causes except trauma;...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lockwood v. Travelers Ins. Co.
...did not conclusively establish suicide. The resolution of the issue was therefore properly for the jury. See Bickes v. Travelers' Insurance Co., 87 Colo. 297, 287 P. 859; Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. v. Fielding, 35 Colo. 19, 83 P. 1013; Travelers Insurance Co. v. McConkey, 127 U.S. 661, 8 S.Ct.......
-
Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U.S. v. Hemenover
... ... accidental result. The company relies primarily upon ... Landress v. Phoenix M. L. Ins. Co., 291 U.S. 491, 54 ... S.Ct. 461, 463, 78 L.Ed. 934, 90 A.L.R. 1382. That was a ... sunstroke ... death' not covered by the policy. Other similar cases ... cited are Caldwell v. Travelers' Ins. Co., 305 ... Mo. 619, 267 S.W. 907, 39 A.L.R. 56, a case of death from a ... hernia ... Ins. Co. v ... Fielding, 35 Colo. 19, 83 P. 1013, 9 Ann.Cas. 916; ... Bickes v. Travelers' Ins. Co., 87 Colo. 297, 287 ... P. 859. Respectable authority thus appears on both ... ...
-
Simonton v. Continental Cas. Co.
...Colo. 275, 57 P.2d 1205; Occidental Life Insurance Co. v. United States National Bank, 98 Colo. 126, 53 P.2d 1180; Bickes v. Travelers' Insurance Co., 87 Colo. 297, 287 P. 859; Hershey v. Agnew, 83 Colo. 89, 262 P. 526. Because of the contradiction caused by application of both rebuttable p......
-
National Farmers Union Life Ins. Co. v. Norwood
...(Emphasis supplied.) See, also, Lampkin v. Travelers' Insurance Company, 11 Colo.App. 249, 52 P. 1040; Bickes v. Travelers' Insurance Company, 87 Colo. 297, 287 P. 859; and Michael v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co., 138 Colo. 450, 334 P.2d 1090. And in Occidental Life Insurance Co. ......