Biogen Idec Ma., Inc. v. Treasurer & Receiver Gen.
Decision Date | 02 July 2009 |
Docket Number | SJC-10344 |
Citation | 908 N.E.2d 740,454 Mass. 174 |
Parties | BIOGEN IDEC MA, INC. v. TREASURER AND RECEIVER GENERAL. |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
David A. Guberman, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
Daniel W. Halston, Boston (Megan Barbero with him) for the plaintiff.
Ben Robbins, Martin J. Newhouse, & Jo Ann Shotwell Kaplan, Boston, for New England Legal Foundation & another, amici curiae, submitted a brief.
Present: MARSHALL, C.J., IRELAND, SPINA, COWIN, CORDY, BOTSFORD, & GANTS, JJ.
This appeal requires us to determine which set of regulations promulgated by different Treasurers of the Commonwealth defining the phrase "outstanding credit balances," see G.L. c. 200A, § 5 ( ), applies to certain uncashed checks issued by Biogen IDEC MA, Inc. (Biogen), for purposes of the abandoned property laws, codified at G.L. c. 200A (c. 200A).1 Treasurer Shannon O'Brien first promulgated regulations interpreting "outstanding credit balances" in 2001. See 960 Code Mass. Regs. §§ 4.00 (2001). Her successor, Treasurer Timothy Cahill, amended those regulations in 2004. See 960 Code Mass. Regs. §§ 4.00 (2004).
In 2003, Treasurer Cahill initiated an audit of Biogen's records to determine whether it had complied with c. 200A. See G.L. c. 200A, § 12 (a). In 2005, an independent auditor, using the amended regulations, concluded that Biogen should have reported $781,251.34 in uncashed accounts payable checks as abandoned property from 1984-2004. Biogen appealed from the auditor's findings, see G.L. c. 200A, § 12 (g), arguing, inter alia, that the amended regulations could not be applied retroactively. A deputy treasurer concluded that the amended regulations could be applied retroactively because they were necessary to correct the definition of "outstanding credit balances" in the original regulations, which he believed was overly broad and in conflict with the statute's language. The deputy treasurer's decision was affirmed by the Treasurer's designee. See G.L. c. 200A, § 12 (h).
Biogen appealed from the Treasurer's final decision to the Superior Court, see G.L. c. 200A, § 12 (i), seeking declaratory relief stating that the amended regulations could not be applied retroactively. Biogen did not dispute that the original regulations, on their face, did not exempt uncashed accounts payable checks, but argued that it was Treasurer O'Brien's policy to interpret the regulations as extending the outstanding credit balance exemption to such checks. In support of this contention, Biogen offered electronic mail messages (e-mails) it received from Treasurer Cahill indicating that Treasurer O'Brien in fact did have a policy of applying the outstanding credit balance exemption to uncashed accounts payable checks. A Superior Court judge allowed Biogen's motion for judgment on the pleadings, vacated the final agency decision, and entered judgment for the Treasurer as to a portion of the auditor's findings that Biogen did not dispute. The Treasurer appealed and we transferred the case to this court on our own motion. We affirm.2
1. Background. Chapter 200A sets forth a comprehensive scheme governing the disposition of abandoned property. The purposes of c. 200A include protecting true owners' rights, bringing additional revenues to the treasury, and providing a procedure for the transfer of abandoned property. Treasurer & Receiver Gen. v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., 388 Mass. 410, 423-424, 446 N.E.2d 1376 (1983). Pursuant to G.L. c. 200A, § 5:
"[A]ll intangible personal property not otherwise presumed to have been abandoned under any other section of this chapter, including but not limited to all certificates of ownership, dividends, stocks, bonds, money, drafts and claims for money and credits, except deposits and the increments thereon referred to in [§ 3] that are held or owing in the commonwealth in the ordinary course of the person's business, including all such property held by any fiduciary, shall be presumed abandoned unless claimed by the beneficiary or person entitled thereto within three years after the date prescribed for payment or delivery."
Property presumed abandoned must be reported to the Treasurer in accordance with G.L. c. 200A, § 7.3 The holder of abandoned property must additionally "pay or deliver to the treasurer at the time of filing the report all property presumed abandoned specified in the report." G.L. c. 200A, § 8A (a). The failure to comply with the reporting and property surrender provisions may result in, among other things, see G.L. c. 200A, § 12 (d), (e), a penalty of not more than $500. G.L. c. 200A, § 12 (c). General Laws c. 200A, § 13A, authorizes the treasurer to "to make necessary rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of this section."
In 2000, the Legislature enacted St.2000, c. 198, "An Act relative to abandoned property," and added the following exemption to G.L. c. 200A, § 5:
4 (Emphasis added.)
St.2000, c. 198, § 2 ( ).
The act introducing the exemption also established an amnesty period during which holders of abandoned property would not, in certain circumstances, be subject to penalties, fines, or interest on unreported abandoned property, St.2000, c. 198, § 4, and required the Treasurer to "conduct an outreach and publicity program to notify business entities and other holders of abandoned property of their obligations under the General Laws, and the amnesty program." Id.
Following enactment of the outstanding credit balance exemption, then-Treasurer Shannon O'Brien promulgated implementing regulations. Pursuant to those regulations, credit balances shall include, but not be limited to:
(Emphasis added.)
960 Code Mass. Regs. § 4.02 (2001).
Title 960 Code Mass. Regs. § 4.03(13) (2001) further provided:
Seeking to avail itself of the amnesty period, Biogen retained a consultant to bring it into compliance with c. 200A. By October, 2002, Biogen had reported $220,308.74 in abandoned property, omitting certain sums it believed fell within the outstanding credit balance exemption.
By a notice dated September 17, 2003, the deputy treasurer of abandoned property, Mark Cavanagh, informed Biogen that Treasurer Cahill6 was invoking his right to examine Biogen's records to determine whether Biogen had complied with the reporting requirements, see G.L. c. 200A, § 12 (a) (), and had retained Kelmar Associates, LLC (Kelmar), an independent accounting firm, to serve as an auditor on the Treasurer's behalf.
On February 12, 2004, while Biogen's audit was underway, Treasurer Cahill filed a notice of the adoption of emergency amendments concerning the outstanding credit balance exemption. See G.L. c. 30A, § 2, fifth par. The emergency regulations defined "credit balances" differently from the original regulations,7 and changed the circumstances in which the outstanding credit balance exemption applied.8 On June 18, 2004, Treasurer Cahill filed the final version of the amendments, which are nearly identical to the emergency regulations. Pursuant to the final amended regulations, "[c]redit [b]alances" are:
960 Code Mass. Regs. § 4.02 (2004). The amended regulations further provide that the credit balance exemption applies in the following circumstances:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
DeCosmo v. Blue Tarp Redevelopment, LLC
...not have the legal force of a statute or regulation" (quotation and citation omitted). See Biogen IDEC MA, Inc. v. Treasurer & Receiver Gen., 454 Mass. 174, 186, 908 N.E.2d 740 (2009) ( Biogen ) ("courts give the force of law only to formal agency regulations" even though "agencies must abi......
-
Nstar Elec. Co. v. Dep't of Pub. Utilities
...a “new policy may not [generally] be retroactively applied where a prior agency policy existed.” Biogen IDEC MA, Inc. v. Treasurer & Receiver Gen., 454 Mass. 174, 190, 908 N.E.2d 740 (2009). See Boston Gas Co. v. Department of Pub. Utils., 405 Mass. 115, 120–121, 539 N.E.2d 1001 (1989). Abs......
-
Regency Transp., Inc. v. Comm'r of Revenue
...of the tax paid to Vermont. We agree with the commissioner's reading of the regulations. See Biogen IDEC MA, Inc. v. Treasurer & Receiver Gen., 454 Mass. 174, 187, 908 N.E.2d 740 (2009) (“We accord substantial deference to the agency's regulations and apply all rational presumptions in favo......
-
Peterborough Oil Co. v. Dep't of Envtl. Prot.
...the statutory language is “sufficiently ambiguous to support multiple, rational interpretations,” Biogen IDEC MA, Inc. v. Treasurer & Receiver Gen., 454 Mass. 174, 186, 908 N.E.2d 740 (2009), citing Goldberg v. Board of Health of Granby, 444 Mass. 627, 633, 830 N.E.2d 207 (2005), we look to......