Bittner v. Superior Court In and For County of Maricopa, 1

• Decision Date: 25 May 1995
• Docket Number: CA-SA,No. 1,1
• Parties: Renea Ann BITTNER and Scott Bittner, wife and husband, Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF MARICOPA, the Honorable Frank T. Galati, a judge thereof, Respondent Judge, Albert T. CASILLAS and Jane Doe Casillas, husband and wife, Real Parties in Interest. 95-0086.
• Court: Arizona Court of Appeals

Page 736

897 P.2d 736

182 Ariz. 434

Renea Ann BITTNER and Scott Bittner, wife and husband, Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF MARICOPA, the Honorable Frank T. Galati, a judge thereof, Respondent Judge Albert T. CASILLAS and Jane Doe Casillas, husband and wife, Real Parties in Interest.

No. 1 CA-SA 95-0086.

Court of Appeals of Arizona Division 1, Department D.

May 25, 1995.

As Corrected June 13, 1995.

[182 Ariz. 435] Whissen, Tidmore & Guendel, P.C. by William K. Whissen, Phoenix, for petitioners.

Steven J. Wells & Associates by William F. Begley, Lisa G. Lewallen, Marianne T. Bayardi, Tempe, for real parties in interest.

OPINION

VOSS, Judge.

This special action involves Rules 5(a) and 7(a), Uniform Rules of Procedure for Arbitration. Although we acknowledge that these rules clearly specify the proper procedure the parties and the arbitrator are to follow, we conclude from the recurrence of this issue that reinforcement is necessary.

On November 3, 1994, the court-appointed arbitrator issued an "Arbitration Award" to Petitioners Renea Ann Bittner and Scott Bittner. On the same day, the arbitrator also filed a "Notice of Decision of Arbitrator" which requested the prevailing party (Bittners) to submit a proposed form of award, an affidavit in support of attorneys' fees, and a verified statement of costs. On November 7, 1994, Bittners' counsel filed a "Statement of Costs and Notice of Taxation of Costs" with the arbitrator, and requested $394.25 in costs. On November 9, 1994, the arbitrator filed an "Amended Arbitration Award," granting special and general damages including for loss of consortium, and costs in the amount of $394.25.

On November 29, 1994, Real Parties in Interest Albert T. and Jane Doe Casillas filed a Notice of Appeal. Bittners filed a Motion to Dismiss claiming the Notice of Appeal was untimely because the twenty-day appeal period began running on November 3, 1994. A hearing was held on the Motion to Dismiss, and the trial court denied the motion, finding that "the November 9, 1994 'Amended Arbitration Award' is the final arbitrator's decision from which an appeal may be taken."

Bittners filed this special action arguing that Casillases' appeal from the arbitration award was untimely because the twenty-day period provided in Rule 7(a) commenced on November 3, 1994, when the "Arbitration Award" was filed rather than November 9, 1994, when the "Amended Arbitration Award" was filed. Bittners contend that 1) the arbitrator lacked jurisdiction to issue any "post-award action," and 2) the arbitrator's act of amending the arbitration award does not extend the twenty-day period for filing an appeal with the superior court.

Rule 7(a) governs the right to appeal from a compulsory arbitration award. It provides in pertinent part:

Any party who appears and participates in the arbitration proceedings may appeal from the award by filing a notice of appeal with the Clerk of the Superior Court within twenty days after the filing of the award.

(Emphasis added.)

Rule 5(a) governs the decision and award process in compulsory arbitration. It states in pertinent part:

Within ten (10) days after completion of the hearing, the arbitrator ... shall file a notice of decision with the Clerk of the Superior Court, and on the same day shall mail or deliver copies thereof to all parties or their counsel. Within ten days of the filing of the notice of decision, the prevailing party shall submit a proposed form of award, an affidavit in support of attorneys' fees ... and a verified statement of costs. Within five days of receipt of the foregoing...