Blue Hills Regional Dist. School Committee v. Flight

Decision Date01 June 1981
PartiesBLUE HILLS REGIONAL DISTRICT SCHOOL COMMITTEE v. Myrtle R. FLIGHT et al. 1
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

Maria J. Woodford, Boston (William F. Looney, Jr., & William J. Carr, Boston, with her), for plaintiff.

Alan J. McDonald, Newton (Gabriel O. Dumont, Jr., Charlestown, with him), for defendants.

Before HENNESSEY, C. J., and BRAUCHER, WILKINS, LIACOS and ABRAMS, JJ.

BRAUCHER, Justice.

In grievance arbitration proceedings pursuant to G.L. c. 150E, § 8, the arbitrator determined that a school committee had violated its collective bargaining agreement by failing to promote a particular teacher to an administrative position because of her sex. He ordered that she be given the promotion and paid a salary differential and interest, and a judge of the Superior Court entered a judgment confirming the award, with a modification as to interest. The Appeals Court held that the grievance was arbitrable but that enforcement of the award "would contravene the non-delegability doctrine" and thus would be unlawful; the case was remanded to the arbitrator to fashion a new remedy. --- Mass.App. ---, --- - --- a, 409 N.E.2d 226 (1980). We allowed the application of both parties for further appellate review. We uphold the decision of the Superior Court awarding the promotion to the grievant, and direct the entry of judgment confirming the award.

The facts found by the arbitrator are recounted at length in the opinion of the Appeals Court. In the spring of 1977 the grievant was a tenured teacher at the Blue Hills Regional Vocational-Technical School, and had served as department head of health services and culinary arts. She and thirty-seven others applied for the position of assistant director, vocational subjects. A man not on the staff of the school was recommended by the superintendent and appointed by the school committee. The arbitrator concluded that the grievant had been the victim of sex discrimination. He ordered that she be promoted to the position she sought and paid the salary differential between the two positions, with nine per cent interest from July 1, 1977, to the date of her appointment. The interest provision was later modified to eight per cent from September 18, 1978, the date the defendants filed an answer requesting confirmation of the award.

The collective bargaining agreement provided explicitly that appointments would be made without regard to sex, and the Appeals Court properly held that a claim of violation of that provision was arbitrable under the agreement. See School Comm. of Danvers v. Tyman, 372 Mass. 106, 114, 360 N.E.2d 877 (1977); School Comm. of New Bedford v. New Bedford Educators Ass'n, --- Mass.App. ---, --- - --- b, 405 N.E.2d 162 (1980); Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co., 415 U.S. 36, 55, 94 S.Ct. 1011, 1023, 39 L.Ed.2d 147 (1974). But, the Appeals Court held, the enforcement of the award by compelling the school committee to appoint the grievant to the position sought "would contravene the non-delegability doctrine," intruding into the area of the school committee's nondelegable, managerial prerogative over educational policy. See Berkshire Hills Regional School Dist. Comm. v. Berkshire Hills Educ. Ass'n, 375 Mass. 522, 525-526, 377 N.E.2d 940 (1978), and cases cited; Craver, The Judicial Enforcement of Public Sector Grievance Arbitration, 58 Tex.L.Rev. 329, 350-353 (1980).

The Appeals Court decision is faithful to our decisions under the nondelegability doctrine, but we think an exception is called for. See School Comm. of Braintree v. Raymond, 369 Mass. 686, 689, 343 N.E.2d 145 (1976), where we suggested an exception if committee action was "a pretense or device actuated by personal hostility." Cf. Cohoes City School Dist. v. Cohoes Teachers Ass'n, 40 N.Y.2d 774, 777, 390 N.Y.S.2d 53, 358...

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • Sheriff of Cnty. v. Jail Officers
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • June 14, 2013
  • Mass. Highway Dep't & Another 1 v. Perini Corp.. & Others.2
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • May 9, 2011
    ...Regional Dist. Sch. Comm. v. Flight, 10 Mass.App.Ct. 459, 472, 409 N.E.2d 226 (1980), reversed in part on other grounds, 383 Mass. 642, 644, 421 N.E.2d 755 (1981) (“For the reasons given by the Appeals Court, we uphold the power of the arbitrator to commence the accumulation of interest”); ......
  • Town of Framingham v. Union
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • July 10, 2018
    ...must give way to the constitutional and statutory prohibitions on invidious discrimination. See Blue Hills Regional Dist. Sch. Comm. v. Flight, 383 Mass. 642, 644, 421 N.E.2d 755 (1981) (creating exception to nondelegable, managerial prerogative over educational policy for the "[d]enial of ......
  • Southern Worcester County Regional Vocational School Dist. v. Labor Relations Com'n
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • June 3, 1982
    ... ... powers of the commission include the power to direct a school committee to reinstate a teacher even if the reinstatement means that a teacher will ... In Blue Hills Regional Dist. School Comm. v. Flight, --- Mass. ---, Mass.Adv.Sh ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT