Board of Assessors of Marlborough v. Com'r of Revenue
Decision Date | 09 April 1981 |
Citation | 419 N.E.2d 289,383 Mass. 876 |
Parties | BOARD OF ASSESSORS OF MARLBOROUGH v. COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE. |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Kuson J. Haddad, City Sol., Marlborough, Aldo Cipriano, Asst. City Sol., Marlborough, with him, for plaintiff.
Joan C. Stoddard, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant.
Before HENNESSEY, C. J., and BRAUCHER, WILKINS, LIACOS and NOLAN, JJ.
RESCRIPT.
The Board of Assessors of Marlborough (board) claims to be aggrieved by the action of the Commissioner of Revenue in determining the equalized valuation of its property subject to local taxation in an amount in excess of $125,000,000 beyond what the board claims is its total fair cash value. See G.L. c. 58, § 9, St. 1978, c. 514, § 40, and § 10A, as appearing in St. 1978, c. 514, § 42. The board appealed this determination to the Appellate Tax Board (A.T.B.). The appeal was mailed on June 18, 1980, under conditions of certified mail. The A.T.B. received it on June 23, 1980. The controlling statute, G.L. c. 58, § 10B, as most recently amended by St. 1979, c. 283, § 2, set forth in full in the margin, 1 requires that the town appeal on or before June 20.
The Commissioner responded to the appeal by filing a motion to dismiss on the ground of a tardy appeal. The A.T.B. allowed the motion. There was no error.
The clear import of § 10B is that the appeal must be made on or before June 20. See Old Colony R. R. v. Assessors of Quincy, 305 Mass. 509, 513-514, 26 N.E.2d 313 (1940). Cases cited by the board which equate timely mailing with service are totally inapposite because they were all decided under statutes or rules which recognize mailing as an appropriate vehicle for service. Section 10B is not such a statute. The appellate remedy is statutory, and therefore, the statute governs. Assessors of Boston v. Suffolk Law School, 295 Mass. 489, 492, 4 N.E.2d 342 (1936). Accordingly, the A.T.B. had no jurisdiction to consider this appeal because of the late filing. Cf. ASSESSORS OF SANDWICH V. COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, --- MASS. ---, 414 N.E.2D 1005.A The decision of the Appellate Tax Board dismissing the plaintiff's appeal is affirmed.
So ordered.
1 General Laws c. 58, § 10B, provides: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Tilcon Massachusetts, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue, 89-P-747
...897 (1975); SCA Disposal Servs., Inc. v. State Tax Commn., 375 Mass. 338, 341, 376 N.E.2d 572 (1978); Assessors of Marlborough v. Commissioner of Rev., 383 Mass. 876, 419 N.E.2d 289 (1981); Roda Realty Trust v. Assessors of Belmont, 385 Mass. 493, 495-496, 432 N.E.2d 522 (1982); Shea v. Com......
- Com. v. Boswell
-
Garrity v. Board of Assessors of Belmont, 96-P-818
...of Brookline, 395 Mass. 178, 478 N.E.2d 954 (1985). This case presents a situation analogous to that in Assessors of Marlborough v. Commissioner of Rev., 383 Mass. 876 (1981). There, the controlling statute, G.L. c. 58, § 10B, set a June twentieth deadline for filing an appeal to the Commis......
-
Nature Church v. Board of Assessors of Belchertown
... ... Cf. Assessors of Marlborough v. Commissioner of Revenue, --- Mass. ---, Mass.Adv.Sh. (1981) 938, 419 N.E.2d 289; Assessors of ... ...