Bohn Manuf'g Co. v. Kountze
Decision Date | 11 November 1890 |
Citation | 46 N.W. 1123,30 Neb. 719 |
Parties | BOHN MANUF'G CO. ET AL. v. KOUNTZE ET AL. |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Syllabus by the Court.
In a contract for the sale of land, it was stipulated that the purchaser should erect a dwelling upon the premises within a stated time. The building was erected, but the labor performed and material furnished were not fully paid for. Held, in an action to foreclose the mechanic's lien, that the liens of the mechanic and material-man have priority over the lien of the vendor for unpaid purchase money.
Appeal from district court, Douglas county; DOANE, Judge.B. G. Burbank and A. C. Troup, for appellants.
Congdon, Clarkson & Hunt, for appellees.
The Bohn Manufacturing Company brought suit in the district court of Douglas county to foreclose a mechanic's lien upon certain premises in the city of Omaha. Herman Kountze, the owner of the fee, Z. B. Berlin, the equitable owner in possession, under a contract of purchase with Kountze, and various mechanic lien holders were made defendants. Afterwards, Robert G. King was made a party defendant. On the 7th day of September, 1887, the defendant Herman Kountze, being the owner of lot 4, block 15, Kountze place, city of Omaha, contracted in writing to convey, by warranty deed, said lot to the defendant Z. B. Berlin, in case Berlin should perform his part of the contract. The contract price was $2,500, the purchaser paid $100 cash down, and agreed to pay $100 January 7, 1888; $50 September 7, 1888; and $50 on the 1st day of each month thereafter, until the whole sum was paid. All deferred pay ments were to bear 8 per cent. interest from date of sale. The contract contained, among others, this provision: The contract also contained this stipulation: “And said party of the first part shall have the right, immediately upon the failure on the part of the second party to comply with the stipulations of the contract, or any part thereof, to enter upon the land aforesaid, and take immediate possession thereof, without process of law, together with the improvements and appurtenances thereunto belonging.” Upon the back of the contract was indorsed this memorandum, which was duly signed and witnessed: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Spengler v. Stiles-Tull Lumber Co.
...Co., 11 L. R. A. 704, 745; Ottey v. Haviland, 36 Miss. 19; McAllister v. Clopton, 57 Miss. 257; Herron v. Warren, 61 Miss. 514; Bohn v. Kountz, 12 L. R. A. 36; Parkhurst v. Railroad Co., 81 Am. Dec. 648; A. S., etc., Ass'n v. Campbell, 43 L. R. A. 622, 627. But for the case of Peck-Hammond ......
-
Lincoln Lumber Co. v. Lancaster
...to ensure that the mechanic's lien would be valid, not to limit liability for the purchaser. See, also, Bohn Mfg. Co. v. Kountze, 30 Neb. 719, 725-26, 46 N.W. 1123, 1125 (1890) ("[w]here a vendee, owning the equitable title, contracts for the erection of a building upon the express authorit......
-
Pioneer Sand & Gravel Co. v. A. R. Turner Co., 24040.
... ... St. Rep. 490; ... Hill v. Gill, 40 Minn. 441, 42 N.W. 294; [170 Wash ... 623] Bohn Mfg. Co. v. Kountze, 30 Neb. 719, 46 N.W. 1123, 12 ... L. R. A. 33; Shearer v. Wilder, 56 ... ...
-
Seipold v. Gibbud
... ... 490; Sunset Lumber Co. v. Bachelder, 167 ... Cal. 512, 140 P. 35, Ann.Cas. 1916B, 664; Bohn Mfg. Co ... v. Kountze, 30 Neb. 719, 46 N.W. 1123, 12 L.R.A. 33. It ... follows that the trial ... ...