Bond v. State
| Decision Date | 04 November 1996 |
| Citation | 684 So.2d 1350 |
| Parties | Carl Bond v. State NO. 88,573 |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
State v. Brantley
... ... 1993) ("[I]t is presumed that provisions added by the amendment affecting substantive rights are intended to operate prospectively ... [; t]here is a presumption of prospectivity that can only be rebutted by the act itself."); see also Bond v. State, 675 So.2d 184, 185 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.) ("The amendment [to the statute] does not provide for retroactive application, therefore, it is to be applied prospectively."), review denied, 684 So.2d 1350 (1996) ... In State v. Nakata, 76 Hawai`i 360, 878 P.2d 699, ... ...
-
Hall v. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
...review of his conviction by the Florida Supreme Court, but review was denied. Id. at 771–72 (quoting Bond v. State , 684 So.2d 1350, 1350 (Fla. 1996) (unpublished table opinion) ).2 See, e.g. , Kuhns v. California , 419 U.S. 1066, 1066, 95 S.Ct. 652, 652, 42 L.Ed.2d 662 (1974) (mem.); Sandq......
-
Bond v. Moore
... ... Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ... Before BIRCH and BLACK, Circuit Judges, and PROPST,* District Judge ... BLACK, Circuit Judge: ... Appellant Carl D. Bond, a Florida state prisoner, appeals a decision of the district court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus as time-barred under the one-year statute of limitations established by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Appellant argues his petition was ... ...
-
Mancini v. State, 96-3612
... ... 1st DCA 1993) ... Although the legislature amended the habitual offender statute after Barnes to require that prior convictions be sequential, that amendment is prospective only. § 775.084(5), Fla. Stat (1993); Ch. 93-406, § 2, Laws of Florida (effective 6/17/93). Bond v. State, 675 So.2d 184 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 684 So.2d 1350 (Fla.1996) ... We have considered the other grounds of appellant's 3.850 motion and find them to be without merit. Affirmed ... ...