Boothman v. Lux
| Citation | 349 Mass. 426,208 N.E.2d 819 |
| Parties | Fred BOOTHMAN v. Helen LUX. |
| Decision Date | 24 June 1965 |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Joseph R. Cleary, Taunton, for defendant.
Nathan Richman, Brockton, for plaintiff.
Before WILKINS, C. J., and SPALDING, WHITTEMORE, CUTTER and KIRK, JJ.
This is an action for breach of an implied warranty of fitness arising out of the renting of a furnished room by the defendant to the plaintiff.
A summary of the evidence most favorable to the plaintiff is as follows: The plaintiff, from time to time when in the vicinity of Holyoke, had obtained rooming accommodations, although not always the same room, at the defendant's house, a two and a half story building. On August 13, 1959, between 9 and 9:30 P.M., the plaintiff went to see the defendant for the purpose of renting a room. The defendant showed the plaintiff a fully furnished bedroom on the second floor and he rented it for the night. The defendant gave the plaintiff a key to the 'downstairs main door.' There was a landing and hallway area on the second floor in which there was a 'small kitchenette, that had a cabinet for pots and pans, a linen cabinet, a one burner plate and a refrigerator.'
A stairway led from the ground floor to the landing and hallway area on the second floor. The plaintiff's bedroom 'was off the hallway, directly across from the top of the * * * stairway.' The front of the refrigerator was about five feet from the nearest part of the stairway. There were lighting fixtures at the bottom of the stairway and along the hallway wall adjacent to the plaintiff's bedroom. The entire area of the landing and hallway floor was covered with linoleum. Bathroom facilities 'went with the room' and the plaintiff could 'use anything he wanted to in the kitchenette'; he had 'used the kitchenette facilities on this and previous occasions.'
Before retiring for the night, the plaintiff left his bedroom and went to the landing at the top of the stairway to see if the downstairs lights were out. While he was on the landing near the refrigerator, he 'slipped and went down the stairs.' Before he slipped he 'observed that at the top of the stairs the linoleum was cracked, split, with a little edge off it'; the place where he slipped was 'near the cracked linoleum.' He did not know at the time what he slipped on 'but felt a bump there,' after which he 'went down the stairs.' The hallway light, about a foot or two from his room, was on.
About 10:30 on the following morning, while being assisted down the stairs by his son and daughter-in-law, the plaintiff saw a piece of used soap which was lodged in the crack in the lineoleum on the landing at the head of the stairs. The soap, which was about the size of an egg, was 'white, hard and dry.' One half of it appeared on the crack and the other half was underneath the linoleum. 'Crumbles of the soap went over the edge of the landing and on[to] the first step.' Although its surface was clean, the linoleum was old and worn. At the time the plaintiff was engaging the room he could 'see * * * the top of the landing but did not see any soap on the landing'; nor did he look for it.
At the close of the evidence the defendant presented a motion for a directed verdict, which was denied. The case was submitted to a jury who found for the plaintiff. The case comes here on the defendant's exceptions to the denial of her motion for a directed verdict and to the refusal to give a requested...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Baker v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.
...106, 134 N.E.2d 415 (1956), quoting from Santa Maria v. Trotto, 297 Mass. 442, 447, 9 N.E.2d 540 (1937). Accord, Boothman v. Lux, 349 Mass. 426, 428, 208 N.E.2d 819 (1965). We intimate no view as to whether the definition of mental illness for civil commitment, i. e., likelihood of harm to ......
-
Forte v. Muzi Motors, Inc.
...of the risk became the law of the trial. Dalton v. Post Publishing Co., 328 Mass. 595, 599, 105 N.E.2d 385 (1952); Boothman v. Lux, 349 Mass. 426, 428, 208 N.E.2d 819 (1965). We hold, therefore, that the judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the motions, and we cannot agree with the......
-
Horton v. Marston
...515, 518--519, 87 N.E.2d 180, 10 A.L.R.2d 1006; Bowman v. Realty Operators Corp., 336 Mass. 395, 145 N.E.2d 833; and Boothman v. Lux, 349 Mass. 426, 428, 208 N.E.2d 819. The Ingalls case and the Povich case cited English decisions, adjudicating a tenant's liability to pay rent, in which a w......