Bowers v. McGavock
Decision Date | 11 March 1905 |
Parties | BOWERS et al. v. McGAVOCK et al. |
Court | Tennessee Supreme Court |
Appeal from Chancery Court, Davidson County; John Allison Chancellor.
Bill by George F. Bowers and others against Myra McGavock administratrix, and others. From a decree for defendants complainants appeal. Affirmed.
Chas C. Trabue and Grafton Green, for appellant Bowers. Jno. J. Vertrees and Turley & Turley, for appellee McGavock.
This bill is brought by a portion of the heirs and distributees of Mrs. Harriet R. Goodwyn, seeking to invalidate certain provisions of the will of her husband, William A. Goodwyn, upon the ground that the charitable trusts thereby sought to be created are invalid and void.
There was an answer filed by the administratrix of Mrs. Goodwyn, the executor of William A. Goodwyn, and the trustees and commissioners appointed to execute the trust. The cause was, on motion of complainants, set down for hearing upon bill and answer, both of which are full and explicit.
The result is that the statements of the answer as to all matters of fact must be taken as true. Rodgers v. Rodgers, 6 Heisk. 495.
The facts, so far as necessary to be stated, are that William A. Goodwyn died on the 13th of October, 1898, in Nashville, Tenn., after making a last will and testament, in which he disposed of a considerable estate, about $400,000 of which is involved in this litigation.
This will, executed May 18, 1893, provided most liberally for the testator's wife, and gave bequests to his half brothers and sisters, his nephews, a niece, and his wife's sister. Ten thousand dollars was also given to the University of the South, at Sewanee, the income of which was to be used alone for the education of young men too poor to pay for themselves; and none of these provisions of the will are questioned.
The contest arises over the provisions of sections 14 and 8 of the will, and they are as follows:
Mrs. Goodwyn participated in and approved of this long-cherished plan of Mr. Goodwyn's to establish this institute at Memphis, for his will states that:
"This legacy for the benefit of my old home has long been thought of by myself and wife, and took shape in a will written by me in November, 1887, and now repeated."
He adds in another part of his will as follows:
"This legacy for the benefit of my old home has long been thought of by myself and wife and took shape in a will written by me in November, 1887, and now repeated."
Mrs. Goodwyn, the widow, the defendant Miss Myra McGavock, her sister, and the defendant Mr. Joseph H. Thompson were named as executors, and qualified as such on the 24th day of October, 1898, when the will was probated. Mrs. Goodwyn acted as executrix for more than four years, and until her death, in March, 1903.
Upon her death, defendant Myra McGavock, her sister, qualified as administratrix of her estate.
The complainants, who are a part of Mrs. Harriet R. Goodwyn's heirs, requested Miss McGavock, the administratrix, to bring this suit, but she refused. They then requested her to resign, so that some one could be appointed who would sue, but she refused to resign. Miss McGavock's reasons for declining to sue or to resign are set forth in the answer of all the defendants, in these words:
Also that:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Duffy's Estate
... ... Spiers, 7 Humph ... 394, 26 Tenn. 394, 407.And in speaking of the holding in the ... Ligon case, the same court in Bowers v. McGavock, ... 114 Tenn. 438, 85 S.W. 893, 896, reaffirmed that holding, and ... said: " Accordingly it was held in that case that the ... ...
-
Winters v. American Trust Co.
... ... ... Bank v. Nelson, 40 Tenn. (3 Head) 634, Ligon v ... Hawkes, 110 Tenn. 514, 75 S.W. 1072, and Bowers v ... McGavock, 114 Tenn. 438, 85 S.W. 893, were cases in ... which the wills sought to be contested had been admitted to ... probate in common ... ...
-
Teckenbrock v. McLaughlin
... ... 514; Meyer v. Fogg, 7 Fla. 292; Storrs v ... Hospital, 180 Ill. 368; In re Brown, 47 Hun, ... 360; Bank v. Nelson, 3 Head (Tenn.) 634; Bowers ... v. McGavock, 114 Tenn. 438; In re Rollwagen, 48 ... How. Pr. (N.Y.) 103. (d) The former judgment is also binding ... upon the husband, because ... ...
-
State v. Lancaster
...would take nothing under the statute of distributions, if there were no will, cannot contest it; and the same language is used in Bowers v. McGavock, supra, and in Ligon v. Hawkes, wherein is said that the general rule in Tennessee is that only those will be allowed to contest the validity ......