Brandies v. State
| Decision Date | 20 February 1969 |
| Docket Number | 3 Div. 399 |
| Citation | Brandies v. State, 219 So.2d 409, 283 Ala. 712 (Ala. 1969) |
| Parties | Robert BRANDIES v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
MacDonald Gallion, Atty.Gen., and Marlin Mooneyham, Asst.Atty.Gen., for petitioner.
L.H. Walden, Montgomery, opposed.
Petition of the State, on the relation of its Attorney General, for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision in Brandies v. State, 44 Ala.App. 648, 219 So.2d 404.
Writ denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
1 cases
-
Anderson v. State
...and being a generic term, embracing all evidence verified by oath, it thus includes affidavits." (citations omitted) In Brandies v. State, 44 Ala.App. 648, 219 So.2d 404, cert. denied, 283 Ala. 712, 219 So.2d 409 (Ala.1969), the court held that the word "deposition" was intended by the legi......
1 books & journal articles
-
MISSING THE MISJOINDER MARK: IMPROVING CRIMINAL JOINDER OF OFFENSES IN CAPITAL-SENTENCING JURISDICTIONS.
...specifically allows the joinder of misdemeanors and felonies); Brandies v. State, 219 So. 2d 404, 405 (Ala. Ct. App. 1968), cert, denied, 219 So. 2d 409 (Ala. For Alaska, see ALASKA R. CRIM. P. 8(a); Guthrie v. State, 222 P.3d 890, 894 (Alaska Ct. App. 2010) (citing to federal cases which c......