Breland v. State
| Decision Date | 21 September 1998 |
| Docket Number | No. S98A1186.,S98A1186. |
| Citation | 269 Ga. 834,504 S.E.2d 193 |
| Parties | BRELAND v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Cynthia Ann Price, Decatur, for David Breland.
John Thomas Morgan III, Dist. Atty., Barbara Blaine Conroy, Robert M. Coker, Asst. Dist. Attys., Decatur, Hon. Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Frank Anthony Ilardi, Asst. Atty. Gen., Paula K. Smith, Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., Department of Law, Atlanta, for the State.
David Breland was sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of Michael Cook.1 He appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial, asserting only the general grounds. We affirm.
The jury was authorized to find that shortly after Breland was asked to leave a neighborhood convenience store because of his intoxication, a witness saw Breland fire several shots from a handgun at passing cars and then walk into a dark field accompanied by his common law wife, Gloria Cotto. According to Cotto's first statement to the police, Breland and Cotto then encountered victim Michael Cook, who offered to sell them a beer. Breland took the beer without paying and when Cook attempted to retrieve it, Breland shot him once in the thigh with a Lorcin .380 calibre pistol. Cook fell to the ground and Breland shot the unarmed man three more times, with one shot cutting the victim's aorta and pulmonary artery, causing the victim to bleed to death. Witness Randy Evans, who observed the unprovoked assault and identified Breland as the shooter, contacted the authorities. Police apprehended Breland later that day as he and Cotto were entering a MARTA rail station. A search of Cotto's luggage uncovered a handgun identified by expert testimony as the murder weapon.
In his original statement to police Breland denied any knowledge of the shooting. In subsequent statements made by Breland and Cotto, they stated that Cook attempted to assault them and that Breland shot the victim in self-defense. Cotto so testified at trial.
Whether the circumstances involved in an accused's use of deadly force justified his response is a matter for the jury, Andrews v. State, 267 Ga. 473(1), 480 S.E.2d 29 (1997), as is the credibility of the witnesses. Russell v. State, 267 Ga. 865(1), 485 S.E.2d 717 (1997). We find the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find beyond a reasonable doubt that Breland did not act in self-defense in shooting Cook and that he was guilty of malice murder....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Morgan v. State
...in the commission of an aggravated assault. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); Breland v. State, 269 Ga. 834, 504 S.E.2d 193 (1998). 2. Morgan contends that the trial court erred by denying certain motions in limine and allowing the State to present evi......
- Brown v. State, S98A0981.
- Payne v. State, A00A0021.