Breslerman v. Dorten, Inc., 77-1601

Citation362 So.2d 37
Decision Date18 July 1978
Docket NumberNo. 77-1601,77-1601
PartiesLouis A. BRESLERMAN et al., Appellants, v. DORTEN, INC., a Florida Corporation, et al., Appellees.
CourtCourt of Appeal of Florida (US)

Grusmark, Jaffe & Karten and Milton E. Grusmark, Miami, for appellants.

Schwartz, Klein & Steinhardt and Norman S. Klein, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, NATHAN and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from an order dismissing their complaint in a class action for recission of lease and damages. The record reflects that in or about 1975, the plaintiffs filed a class action for damages and recission of a 99 year condominium recreation lease alleging that a portion of the leased condominium recreation property is located beyond the mean high water mark. The trial judge dismissed the complaint. On appeal to this court, the order of dismissal was affirmed for the reason that the complaint sounded in fraud and deceit. It was held that a cause of action based on fraud and deceit is generally inappropriate for a class action. Breslerman v. Dorten, Inc., 320 So.2d 442, 443 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

In or about 1976, the plaintiffs proceeded to refile their class action, deleting the allegations of fraud and deceit. Upon motion of the defendants, the trial court again dismissed the complaint and this appeal ensued.

Review of the complaint as refiled discloses that plaintiffs state a valid cause of action for a class action. Port Royal, Inc. v. Conboy, 154 So.2d 734 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963); Costin v. Hargraves, 283 So.2d 375 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). Further, we hold that Section 718.111, Florida Statutes (1977), does not prohibit a condominium unit owner from bringing a class action on behalf of all unit owners of the condominium similarly situated. Imperial Towers Condominium, Inc. v. Brown, 338 So.2d 1081 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). Therefore, we find that the trial court erred in dismissing the complaint.

Reversed and remanded.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Rogers & Ford Const. Corp. v. Carlandia Corp.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • November 10, 1993
    ...firm for breach of warranty regarding plumbing defects, and condominium association was permitted to intervene); Breslerman v. Dorten, Inc., 362 So.2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) (unit owner may bring class action on behalf of similarly situated unit owners even where condominium association is n......
  • Spierer v. City of North Miami Beach
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • March 6, 1990
    ...City's utility rates and charges. See Skaggs-Albertson's v. ABC Liquors, Inc., 363 So.2d 1082, 1088 (Fla.1978); Breslerman v. Dorten, Inc., 362 So.2d 37, 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); § 718.111(3), Fla.Stat. (1987). The complaint alleges, however, that Spierer's claims arise by virtue of the utili......
  • Dickerson v. Travelers Indem. Co., 78-893
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • December 20, 1978
    ...to amend their complaint in order to assert with more specificity their individual claims, if possible, See Breslerman v. Dorten, Inc., 362 So.2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). AFFIRMED with GRIMES, C. J., and SCHEB and RYDER, JJ., concur. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT