Bridges Farms, Inc. v. Blue

Decision Date17 February 1997
Docket NumberNo. S96G1658,S96G1658
Citation267 Ga. 505,480 S.E.2d 598
Parties, 97 FCDR 523 BRIDGES FARMS, INC. v. BLUE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

John T. Croley, Jr., Fitzgerald, for Bridges Farms, Inc.

John Dunlap Varnell, Albany, for Blue.

CARLEY, Justice.

Scott Blue brought suit, seeking to recover for personal injuries he sustained while on property owned by Bridges Farms, Inc. (Farms). The jury returned a general verdict for Blue, and Farms appealed to the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals held that the trial court erred in giving a charge on future medical expenses. Bridges Farm, Inc. v. Blue, 221 Ga.App. 773, 774(1), 472 S.E.2d 465 (1996). Concluding that this error related only to damages and not to liability, however, the Court of Appeals " 'remanded for a new trial, limited solely to the proper amount of damages. [Cit.]' [Cits.]" Bridges Farm, Inc., supra at 775(1), 472 S.E.2d 465. We granted certiorari and stated the issue to be addressed as:

Where a general verdict is returned in favor of plaintiff in a trial of a personal injury action, at which trial evidence of plaintiff's comparative negligence was introduced and a charge thereon given, does the reversal by the appellate court on the basis that the trial court erred in instructing on future medical expenses require a new trial as to liability and damages or a new trial only as to the amount of damages?

Georgia does not adhere to the common-law principle of contributory negligence whereby any negligence whatsoever on the part of the plaintiff bars his recovery, but "follows instead the comparative-negligence doctrine, which merely limits the amount of recovery. [Cit.]" Lassiter v. Poss, 85 Ga.App. 785, 789(1), 70 S.E.2d 411 (1952). Under the comparative-negligence doctrine of this state, a plaintiff whose negligence is less than that of the defendant "is not denied recovery although his damages shall be diminished by the jury in proportion to the degree of fault attributable to him. [Cit.]" Union Camp Corp. v. Helmy, 258 Ga. 263, 267, 367 S.E.2d 796 (1988). "However, where the negligence of the plaintiff and the defendant are equal, or the negligence of the plaintiff is more than that of the defendant, the plaintiff could not recover." McDowall Trans. Inc. v. Gault, 80 Ga.App. 445, 447, 56 S.E.2d 161 (1949).

Accordingly, in a comparative-negligence case, the recovery of damages and the liability of the defendant are issues which are "inextricably joined." Thomas v. Clark, 188 Ga.App. 606, 608(1), 373 S.E.2d 668 (1988). The negligent defendant's liability for damages is dependent upon the extent of the negligence of the plaintiff. If the negligence of the plaintiff equals or exceeds that of the defendant, the defendant is not liable to that negligent plaintiff. It follows that reversal of the judgment entered on a general verdict returned for the plaintiff in a case...

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • Martin v. Six Flags Over Ga. II, L.P.
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 5 Junio 2017
    ...damages only is impermissible." Head v. CSX Transp., Inc. , 271 Ga. 670, 672 (4), 524 S.E.2d 215 (1999) (citing Bridges Farms, Inc. v. Blue , 267 Ga. 505, 480 S.E.2d 598 (1997) ) (emphasis added). Assuming without deciding that this categorical rule continues to apply in comparative neglige......
  • Zaldivar v. Prickett
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 6 Julio 2015
    ...OCGA § 51–12–33(g). Together, subsections (a) and (g) codify the doctrine of comparative negligence,4 see Bridges Farms v. Blue, 267 Ga. 505, 505, 480 S.E.2d 598 (1997), a doctrine that was recognized in Georgia long before the present apportionment statute was enacted in 2005. See, e.g., L......
  • Johns v. Suzuki Motor of Am., Inc.
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 19 Octubre 2020
    ...reduced but not eliminated unless the plaintiff's fault is the same as or greater than that of the defendant(s). Bridges Farms v. Blue , 267 Ga. 505, 505, 480 S.E.2d 598 (1997). The parties make no argument that we should draw a distinction between the "contributory negligence" discussed in......
  • Couch v. Red Roof Inns, Inc.
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 9 Julio 2012
    ...to reduce the plaintiff's recovery of damages in proportion to the degree of fault attributed to the plaintiff. Bridges Farms v. Blue, 267 Ga. 505, 480 S.E.2d 598 (1997); Union Camp Corp. v. Helmy, 258 Ga. 263, 367 S.E.2d 796 (1988). But, again, a defendant's intentional conduct precluded t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT