Britt v. State
Decision Date | 05 January 2001 |
Docket Number | No. 1D99-3416.,1D99-3416. |
Parties | Tross BRITT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Phil Patterson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Lori D. Stith, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
In this direct criminal appeal, appellant raises two issues: (1) whether the trial court committed fundamental error when it imposed conditions of community control in its written order that were not orally pronounced; and (2) whether conditions of community control prohibiting him from living near or working at a "school, day-care center, park, playground, or other place where children regularly congregate" are unconstitutionally vague and, therefore, void. We affirm.
760 So.2d 150 (Fla. 2000). Accordingly, we will not address the merits of the issue challenging the inclusion in the written order of certain conditions of community control that were not orally pronounced.
Appellant next challenges as unconstitutionally vague two conditions of community control. The first prohibited appellant from doing "volunteer work, employment, or community activity at any school, daycare center, park, playground, or other place where children regularly congregate"; and the second prohibited appellant from "liv[ing] within 1,000 feet of a school, daycare center, park, playground, or other place where children regularly congregate." Both conditions of supervision are now mandatory for individuals convicted of sexual battery upon a minor and other similar offenses, as was appellant. § 948.03(5)(a)2 & 6, Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1998). According to appellant, impermissible vagueness is created by the phrase "or other place where children regularly congregate." We disagree.
"The standard for testing vagueness under Florida law is whether the statute gives a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice of what constitutes forbidden conduct." Brown v. State, 629 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla.1994) (citing Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville, 405 U.S. 156, 162, 92 S.Ct. 839, 31 L.Ed.2d 110 (1972)). The state contends that the doctrine of ejusdem generis requires that the phrase "or other place where children regularly congregate" be read in conjunction with the enumeration of specific places identified, i.e., schools, daycare centers, parks and playgrounds. See generally Green v. State, 604 So.2d 471, 473 (Fla. 1992)
(). We agree with the state. Applying this general rule of construction, we are of the opinion that the two conditions challenged by appellant are sufficiently precise to "give[] a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice of what constitutes forbidden conduct." 629 So.2d at 842. We note that,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wilfong v. Com.
...N.E.2d at 1260. 78. Id. 79. Id. 80. 232 Wis.2d 315, 606 N.W.2d 275 (1999). 81. Simonetto, 606 N.W.2d at 277-78. See also Britt v. State, 775 So.2d 415 (Fla.App.2001)(holding condition that prohibited probationer from living near or working at a "school, daycare center, park, playground, or ......
-
Whatley v. Zatecky, 14–2534
...part of the person's business” and a “principal part or substantial part of the stock in trade” of that business); Britt v. State , 775 So.2d 415, 416–17 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001) (upholding against a vagueness challenge a statute that prohibited defendant from living or working within 1000 feet......
-
Doe v. Cooper
...frequently congregate, including schools, day care centers, theme parks, playgrounds, etc.” is not vague); Britt v. State , 775 So.2d 415, 416–17 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2001) (conditions of community control prohibiting sex offender from living near or working at a “school, daycare center, park, ......
-
Lawson v. State
...individuals of common intelligence the basis to know and understand its meaning." Lawson, 941 So.2d at 489; accord Britt v. State, 775 So.2d 415, 417 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (stating that two probation conditions were "sufficiently precise to `give [ ] a person of ordinary intelligence fair not......