Broadacre Trailer Lodge, Inc. v. Johnson

Decision Date31 August 1982
Docket NumberNo. 1-482A77,1-482A77
Citation439 N.E.2d 684
PartiesBROADACRE TRAILER LODGE, INC., Defendant-Appellant, v. Delbert JOHNSON, Thelma Johnson, Ruth Milam, Elvis Milam, and Kelly Milam, Plaintiffs-Appellees.
CourtIndiana Appellate Court

Nelson G. Grills, Indianapolis, William Wolf, Wolf, Robak & Murphy, Greenfield, for defendant-appellant.

Robert S. Rifkin, Maurer & Rifkin, Indianapolis, for plaintiffs-appellees.

NEAL, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Defendant-appellant Broadacre Trailer Lodge, Inc. (Broadacre) appeals adverse judgments for punitive damages in favor of Thelma Johnson, Elvis Milam, Ruth Milam, and Kelly Milam, after a trial by jury in the Hancock Circuit Court.

We reverse.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

Delbert and Thelma Johnson, husband and wife, owned a vacant mobile home located on a lot rented from Broadacre. With Broadacre's permission the Johnson sublet the lot temporarily to Elvis and Ruth Milam, husband and wife, and their seven year old son, Kelly, while Ruth Milam sought medical treatment in Indianapolis. All of the above persons commenced this action against Broadacre for wrongful eviction, alleging that Broadacre disconnected all utilities which serviced the trailer. After a trial the jury returned verdicts for the Johnsons and Milams and awarded damages as follows:

                                 Compensatory  Punitive
                                 ------------  --------
                Delbert Johnson    $1,500.        -  0-
                Thelma Johnson        -0-      $1,000
                Elvis Milam           -0-      10,000
                Ruth Milam            -0-      10,000
                Kelly Milam           -0-      10,000
                

Separate verdicts were returned for each plaintiff, but the verdict forms were all identical and read as follows:

"We, the Jury, find for the Plaintiff, ________________, and against the defendant, Broadacre Trailer Lodge, Inc., and access [sic] compensatory damages in the amount of $__________, and punitive damages in the amount of $__________."

In each verdict the name of the plaintiff and the amounts of the respective awards, as indicated above, were set forth in the appropriate blanks.

ISSUE

The sole question, pointedly stated and narrowly argued, on this appeal is whether the awards of punitive damages can stand where there is an express finding of no actual damages.

DISCUSSION AND DECISION

In Newton v. Yates, (1976) 170 Ind.App. 486, 353 N.E.2d 485, this court stated:

"Apparently Indiana has never affirmatively taken a position on the question of nominal damages being a prerequisite for allowing punitive damages. In a number of cases Indiana has held that punitive damages must be in some reasonable proportion to the compensatory damages awarded, Murphy Auto Sales, Inc. v. Coomer (1953), 123 Ind.App. 709, 112 N.E.2d 589. From that holding, it is but a short and logical step to follow the better reasoned decisions of foreign jurisdictions in requiring compensatory damages as a prerequisite for any award of punitive damages. Ross v. Deposit Guaranty Nat. Bank of Jackson, Miss. (S.D.Miss.1974), 400 F.Supp. 45; Hubbard v. Superior Court of Maricopa County (1975), 111 Ariz. 585, 535 P.2d 1302; Martin v. United Security Services, Inc (1975), Fla., 314 So.2d 765; Stratton v. Jensen (1975), 64 Mich.App. 602, 236 N.W.2d 527; Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc. v. Keulemans (1975), 275 Md. 441, 340 A.2d 705; Madison v. Wigal (1958), 18 Ill.App.2d 564, 153 N.E.2d 90."

Id. 170 Ind.App. at 495, 353 N.E.2d 485.

The ruling in Newton, supra, was followed in Large v. Gregory, (1981) Ind.App., 417 N.E.2d 1160; and McCormick Piano & Organ Co., Inc. v. Geiger, (1980) Ind.App., 412 N.E.2d 842. Other punitive damages cases and the instruction given in the case at bar state that if the elements of actual damages are found to exist, then an additional amount may be awarded as punitive damages. See Art Hill Ford, Inc. v. Callender, (1981) Ind., 423 N.E.2d 601; Indianapolis Bleaching Company v. McMillan, (1916) 64 Ind.App. 268, 113 N.E. 1019. 25 C.J.S. Damages Sec. 118 states that:

"In general actual damages must be shown in order that exemplary damages may be recoverable, but in some jurisdictions an award of nominal damages is a sufficient basis for the recovery of exemplary damages which are otherwise recoverable.

* * *

* * *

... As it has been otherwise stated, expressly or in substance, exemplary damages cannot constitute...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Keehr v. Consolidated Freightways of Delaware, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • 15 July 1987
    ...Pontiac, Inc. v. Batchelor, 266 Ind. 310, 317, 362 N.E.2d 845, 849 (1977); see also infra p. 142. In Broadacre Trailer Lodge, Inc. v. Johnson, 439 N.E.2d 684 (Ind.App. 1st Dist.1982), another case relied on by CF, an Indiana court of appeals quoted the above language from Newton, seemingly ......
  • Tippecanoe Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Board of County Com'rs of Tippecanoe County, 2-982A324
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 10 November 1983
  • Don Medow Motors, Inc. v. Grauman
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 29 March 1983
    ...Punitive damages are recoverable in breach of warranty actions where compensatory damages are awarded, Broadacre Trailer Lodge, Inc. v. Johnson (1982), Ind.App., 439 N.E.2d 684, 685-686; the public interest is served by the deterrent effect of the punitive damages, Hibschman Pontiac, Inc. v......
  • Grimes v. Jones
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 13 March 1991
    ...is that there is no separate cause of action for punitive damages; they are derivative of actual damages. Broadacre Trailer Lodge, Inc. v. Johnson (1982), Ind.App., 439 N.E.2d 684, 686, transfer denied. This is rooted in the notion that it is not the primary office of the civil law to punis......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT