Brooks v. Palm Bay Towers Condominium Ass'n, Inc.
Decision Date | 25 September 1979 |
Docket Number | Nos. 78-2009,78-2010,s. 78-2009 |
Citation | 375 So.2d 348 |
Parties | Philip B. BROOKS et al., Appellants, v. PALM BAY TOWERS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Shalle Stephen Fine, Miami, for appellants.
Katz & Rosen and Steven M. Rosen, Miami, for appellees.
Before HENDRY, KEHOE and SCHWARTZ, JJ.
This consolidated appeal is from an order of the trial court entered with respect to a certain count contained in appellants/plaintiffs' amended complaint. Both appellants and appellees had filed motions for summary judgment as to the count; the appellees were granted summary judgment, and the appellants/plaintiffs thereafter filed their notices of appeal.
The pivotal question presented to the trial court and upon which this appeal revolves is whether the condominium developer is a "unit owner" under Chapter 711, Florida Statutes (1971) and, therefore, obligated to pay all assessments levied against unit owners.
Initially, it must be noted that the subject real property was submitted to condominium ownership in 1972, thus, the condominium statute of 1971 governs. 1 It defines the pertinent terminology as follows:
"711.14 Common expenses and common surplus.
(1) Common expenses shall include the expenses of the operation, maintenance, repair, or replacement of the common elements, costs of carrying out the powers and duties of the association and any other expense designated as common expense by this law, the declaration or the bylaws.
The statute itself defines the term "unit owner" as follows:
"711.03 (14) Unit owner or owner of a unit means the owner of a condominium parcel."
Further, the statute defines the term "condominium parcel":
"711.03 (8) Condominium parcel means a unit together with the undivided share in the common elements which is appurtenant to the unit."
Additionally, the statute recognizes the status of the condominium parcel as separate real property:
"711.04 (1) A condominium parcel is a separate parcel of real property, the ownership of which may be in fee simple, or any other estate in real property recognized by law."
The statute provides for the creation of the condominium:
711.08, which provides in pertinent part:
"(1) A condominium may be created by recording in the public records of the county wherein the land to be included is located a declaration executed with the formalities of a deed by all persons having title of record to such land, which declaration shall contain or provide for the following matters:
(a) A statement submitting the condominium property to condominium ownership . . .
(d) An identification of each unit by letter, name, or number, or combination thereof, so that no unit bears the same designation as any other unit.
(g) The proportions or percentages and manner of sharing common expenses and owning common surplus
(1) Such other provisions not inconsistent with this law as may be desired, including but not limited to those relating to amendment of the declaration . . ."
Under the language of the 1971 statute, once the real property has been submitted to condominium status all the units become separate parcels of real property. Title to such parcels may be in fee simple or in any other estate recognized by law; it stands to reason that prior to the sale of a unit, the developer is clearly the unit owner. As such, the developer is liable for assessments that come due while title is held by the developer regardless of how title is acquired. See Sections 711.14(1) and 711.15, Florida Statutes (1971).
The appellees urge that the intention of the Legislature was to concern itself with the person who acquires title to an individual unit from the developer when referring to common expenses and assessments of the "unit owner", 2 and that there is a clear dichotomy between the "developer" and "unit owner" phraseology which prohibits the developer of a condominium from being considered a unit owner under the circumstances of this cause. We cannot agree, and must reverse the order of summary judgment, as a matter of law.
Case law authority supports our line of reasoning in interpreting the applicable statute. In Margate Village Condominium Association, Inc. v. Wilfred, Inc., 350 So.2d 16 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), where the court reversed an injunction granted a developer contesting assessments (which included the expenses of litigation brought by the association against the developer), it was held that the developer-lessor, as a unit owner, was subject to the same assessments as other unit owners. 3 In its opinion the court refers to the earlier holding in ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Palm Bay Towers Corp. v. Brooks, 84-576
...ownership of a number of the condominium units. These parties were previously before this court in Brooks v. Palm Bay Towers Condominium Association, 375 So.2d 348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 386 So.2d 640 (Fla.1980), which will be discussed in more detail Initially, it must be noted ......
-
Gables Ins. Recovery, Inc. v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., s. 3D15-2320 & 3D16-87
...violation of what were then the condominium law, sections 711.14 and .15, Florida Statutes (1971). Brooks v. Palm Bay Towers Condominium Ass'n, Inc., 375 So.2d 348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). In the subsequent en banc decision following a later judgment in the same circuit court case, this Court no......
-
Aluminum Industries Corp. v. Camelot Trails Condominium Corp., 94-0713
...See Hatfield v. La Charmant Home Owners Ass'n, Inc., 469 N.E.2d 1218, 1221 (Ind.Ct.App.1984) (citing Brooks v. Palm Bay Towers Condominium Ass'n, Inc., 375 So.2d 348 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1979) (developer a "unit owner" obligated to pay proportionate share of common expenses)). We conclude that ......
-
First Chicago Trust Co. of Illinois v. Old Willow Falls Condominium Ass'n
...a unit owner, we find cases from other jurisdictions instructive for purposes of our review. In Brooks v. Palm Bay Towers Condominium Association, Inc., (Fla.App.1979), 375 So.2d 348, the Florida court determined that a condominium developer is a unit owner, and as such is liable for assess......