Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Aday
Decision Date | 30 January 1911 |
Citation | 134 S.W. 928,97 Ark. 425 |
Parties | BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE FIREMEN & ENGINEMEN v. ADAY |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Union Circuit Court; George W. Hays, Judge; affirmed.
STATEMENT BY THE COURT.
This suit is on a benefit certificate for $ 1,500, numbered A-92592, taken out by appellee, a fireman, in the Brotherhood of Locomotive Fireman & Enginemen, when he joined the brotherhood in 1902. He went delinquent in 1906, but was reinstated, and it was alleged that while he was a member in good standing upon the books of the grand lodge his left hand became permanently paralyzed, which permanently and totally disabled or incapacitated him from performing all manual labor, which by the terms of his beneficiary certificate entitled him to the payment of the full amount thereof; that he had duly filed his claim as required by the laws of the brotherhood, and payment thereof was refused. Appellant answered, admitting that appellee became a member of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, and that the certificate sued upon was issued to him; that he was suffering from paralysis of his left hand; denied that it occurred at the time and in the manner alleged; denied that said paralysis totally disabled or incapacitated him from all manual labor; that said paralysis is permanent, and that said paralysis is of either of plaintiff's extremities; denied that it promised to pay appellee $ 1,500 or any other sum and alleged that he obtained said beneficiary certificate upon a false warranty that he did not have paralysis, which rendered it void.
A copy of the constitution of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen was introduced in evidence, and section 70 provides:
"A beneficiary member in good standing upon the books of the grand lodge becoming totally and permanently blind in one or both eyes, or who may become totally and permanently disabled or incapacitated from performing all manual labor on account of Bright's disease of the kidneys, permanent paralysis of either extremities, locomoter ataxia, or consumption of the lungs in its last stage, shall be entitled to the amount of his beneficiary certificate," etc.
The testimony tended to show that Arthur S. Aday filed his claim for total disability under his benefit certificate in accordance with the constitution of the order, demanding the entire amount thereof on March 16, 1908, on account of permanent paralysis of his left hand; that his hand was not in as bad condition then as at the time of trial when he testified: He testified that he had worked some in a pool room within 18 months before the trial, racking up the pool balls, and also on the river while in Kentucky as the clerk of a boat, and two or three months on the railroad in Louisiana as a flagman after putting in his claim before he was taken out of the railroad service in August, 1908; that there is nothing the matter with his right hand.
Dr. H A. Murphy testified that in May or June, 1909, he made an examination of appellee's hand at the request of an official of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen.
Dr. L L. Purifoy testified that in the summer of 1909, he made an examination of the hand of appellee at the instance of appellant, and that he found paralysis in his left hand.
Dr. J B. Wharton testified that he was the medical examiner for appellant, and in his official capacity wrote the following letter to the grand medical examiner of the order, and that everything in it was true to the best of his knowledge and belief:
(Signed) "A. S. Day.
The court directed the jury to find a verdict for plaintiff for the amount sued for, and from the judgment defendant appealed.
Judgment affirmed.
R. L. Floyd, for appellant.
The court erred in giving a peremptory instruction for appellee because there was evidence to support a finding by the jury that the paralysis was not permanent; that it was not total; that he was not totally disabled or incapacitated...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rickey v. New York Life Ins. Co.
... ... Fogelsong v. Modern ... Brotherhood, 121 Mo.App. 548; Fogelsong v. Modern ... Brotherhood, ... Orrill, 69 N.E. 68; Brotherhood ... v. Aday, 97 Ark. 425; Industrial, etc., v ... Hawkins, 94 Ark ... ...
-
Rickey v. New York Life Ins. Co.
...v. Globe Ins. Co., 107 Neb. 18, 184 N.W. 903; Davis v. Midland Cas. Co., 190 Ill. App. 338; Grand Lodge v. Orrill, 69 N.E. 68; Brotherhood v. Aday, 97 Ark. 425; Industrial, etc., v. Hawkins, 94 Ark. 417; Young v. Travelers Ins. Co., 80 Me. 244, 13 Atl. 896; Booth v. United States Fidelity &......
- Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen v. McCray
-
Robinson v. Brotherhood of R.R. Trainmen
... ... Robinson, 147 Ill. 138, 35 N.E. 168; Brotherhood v ... Aday, 97 Ark. 425, 134 S.W. 928, 34 L.R.A. (N. S.) 126 ... ...