Bubenik v. Bubenik
| Decision Date | 23 December 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 80-149,80-149 |
| Citation | 392 So.2d 943 |
| Parties | Olga K. BUBENIK, Appellant, v. Joseph G. BUBENIK, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
William C. Lewis, Coral Gardens, for appellant.
Stabinski, Funt, Levine & Vega and Regina F. Zelonker, Miami, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, C. J., SCHWARTZ, J., and LILES, WOODIE A. (Ret.), Associate Judge.
LILES, WOODIE A. (Ret.), Associate Judge.
Olga K. Bubenik and Joseph G. Bubenik were married September 12, 1973. Prior to filing the instant petition for dissolution of marriage, Olga K. Bubenik consulted her attorney, William C. Lewis, and requested her husband to give Mr. Lewis a call so that the dissolution and other matters could go forward to resolution. Mr. Bubenik called Mr. Lewis and, by appointment, visited his office. He was shown a copy of a requested property settlement agreement. Mr. Bubenik made several changes in the agreement, some of which were to the benefit of his wife. He thereupon signed it and the same day a petition for dissolution was filed.
When the matter came on before the trial judge for hearing, he specifically found that there was no fraud, deceit, duress, coercion or overreaching on the part of the petitioner or her attorney in arriving at the property settlement agreement and that there was no impropriety in the actions of Mr. Lewis. However, the trial judge set the agreement aside, holding that the husband did not understand his legal rights and obligations; that he should have had an attorney of his own choosing; and that, by virtue of his attitude during the trial, the husband was in a conciliatory frame of mind in hopes that his wife would reconcile with him.
Having set the property settlement agreement aside, the trial judge went on to find that the husband had a special equity in a parcel of property which had heretofore been agreed upon in the property settlement agreement.
The law is quite clear regarding the setting aside of property agreements when entered into by knowing adults. All of the cases we are aware of require an allegation and proof of either fraud, duress, deceit, coercion, or overreaching on the part of the party obtaining the agreement. We know of no case where a property settlement agreement can be set aside on the grounds that one of the parties had not retained his or her own counsel at the time of the signing. The husband in the instant case was an airline pilot; he and his wife lived...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Petracca v. Petracca
...legal counsel for a valid agreement." Casto, 508 So.2d at 334; see also Cowen v. Cowen, 95 So.2d 584 (Fla.1957), and Bubenik v. Bubenik, 392 So.2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), neither of which were disapproved in Casto. 508 So.2d at 334.4 Cf. Seiffert v. Seiffert, 702 So.2d 273 (Fla. 1st DCA 199......
-
McMahan v. McMahan
...is not sufficient ground to set aside the agreement); Bockoven v. Bockoven, 444 So.2d 30 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), and Bubenik v. Bubenik, 392 So.2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (fact that appellants were unrepresented by attorneys at the time the separation agreements were executed was not sufficient......
-
Hahn v. Hahn, 84-473
...property settlement agreement, the answer clearly is no. See Bockoven v. Bockoven, 444 So.2d 30 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Bubenik v. Bubenik, 392 So.2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). The basic rule of Florida law, of course, is that a spouse may waive her right to alimony of any type (although not chil......
-
Tenneboe v. Tenneboe
...settlement agreement is not sufficient, in and of itself, as a ground to have the agreement vacated or modified. Bubenik v. Bubenik, 392 So.2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); McGuire v. McGuire, 385 So.2d 151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Cf. Casto v. Casto, 508 So.2d at 332, 334-335. 2 Rather, the presence ......
-
Legal theories & defenses
...v. Cronacher , 508 So.2d 1270, 1271 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). See also Herald v. Hardin , 116 So. 863 (Fla. 1928); Bubenik v. Bubenik , 392 So.2d 943, 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Vitakis-Valchine v. Valchine , 793 So.2d 1094, 1096 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). LEGAL THEORIES & DEFENSES §18:100 Florida Causes ......