Buena Vista Manor v. Century Mfg. Co., 2--56536

Decision Date28 August 1974
Docket NumberNo. 2--56536,2--56536
Citation221 N.W.2d 286
PartiesBUENA VISTA MANOR, Appellant, v. CENTURY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellee.
CourtIowa Supreme Court

Paul W. Deck, Law Offices, Sioux City, for appellant.

Paul J. Yaneff, Sioux City, for appellee.

Heard by MOORE, C.J., and LeGRAND, REYNOLDSON, HARRIS and McCORMICK, JJ.

MOORE, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff has appealed from trial court's order sustaining nonresident defendant's special appearance. The sole issue raised is whether plaintiff in giving defendant notice complied with the requirements of the long-arm statute, Code section 617.3. We conclude the trial court erred.

The material facts as shown by the pleadings, the special appearance, resistance thereto and affidavits are not disputed. Plaintiff, Buena Vista Manor, a nursing home in Storm Lake purchased a whirlpool from defendant, Century Manufacturing Company. A part broke on the whirlpool and caused injury to one of plaintiff's patients. Plaintiff's demand that defendant defend and settle the patient's damage action against plaintiff was refused and rejected. Plaintiff made a good faith settlement with the patient and then brought action against defendant for indemnity or in the alternative, equitable contribution. To establish jurisdiction in the Buena Vista County District Court plaintiff was required to comply with the provisions of Code section 617.3. As material here it provides:

'* * * If such a person (a nonresident) commits a tort in whole or in part in Iowa against a resident of Iowa, such acts shall be deemed to be doing business in Iowa by such person for the purpose of service of process or original notice on such person under this Act, and shall be deemed to constitute the appointment of the secretary of state of Iowa to be the true and lawful attorney of such person upon whom may be served all lawful process of original notice in actions or proceedings arising from or growing out of such contract or tort * * *. The * * ommitting of the tort shall be deemed to be the agreement of * * * such person that any process or original notice so served shall be of the same legal force and effect as if served personally upon such defendant within the state of Iowa.

'Service of such process or original notice shall be made (1) by filing duplicate copies of said process or original notice with said secretary of state. * * * and (2) by mailing to the defendant * * * by registered or certified mail, a notification of said filing with the secretary of state, the same to be so mailed within ten days after such filing with the secretary of state. * * *. Proof of service shall be made by filing in court the duplicate copy of the process or original notice with the secretary of state's certificate of filing, and the affidavit of the plaintiff or his attorney of compliance herewith.'

On October 27, 1972 plaintiff filed a properly prepared original notice of the action here involved with the secretary of state. The secretary of state returned to plaintiff's attorney a certificate of such filing. On November 2, 1972 plaintiff by certified mail sent a notification of such filing, including a copy of the original notice, to defendant at its place of business. The envelope was addressed to Century Manufacturing Company, Owen Berthelsen, Agent for Service, Industrial Park, Aurora, Nebraska. Plaintiff's research had disclosed Owen Berthelsen was an officer and the designated service agent of defendant in Nebraska.

On November 20, 1972, plaintiff's letter was returned to its lawyer marked 'unclaimed.' On the next day, November 21, 1972, after additional inquiry and research, plaintiff's lawyer by certified mail again sent a copy of the original notice to defendant company. The envelope was addressed to Cal Berthelsen, Vice-President, Century Manufacturing Co., West Highway #34, R.R. #2, Aurora, Nebraska, 68818. A few...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • L.F. Noll Inc. v. Eviglo
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • 29 Junio 2012
    ...we strictly construe statutes providing extraordinary methods of securingjurisdiction over nonresidents. See Buena Vista Manor v. Century Mfg. Co., 221 N.W.2d 286, 288 (Iowa 1974) (citing Matney v. Currier, 203 N.W.2d 589, 593 (Iowa 1973)). It is thus not surprising that our cases regarding......
  • Creative Communication Consultants, Inc. v. Byers Transp. Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • 21 Mayo 1975
    ...with the terms of § 617.3. We have consistently held such statutes must be strictly construed. Buena Vista Manor v. Century Manufacturing Co., 221 N.W.2d 286, 288 (Iowa 1974). The trouble with this case is that the parties have not to this day been able to agree on the rationale for asserti......
  • Barrett v. Bryant
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • 23 Abril 1980
    ...Webb denied receiving the notification of filing but does not deny receiving the postal notices. In Buena Vista Manor v. Century Manufacturing Co., 221 N.W.2d 286, 288 (Iowa 1974), the court said the legislature intended that the addressee would receive the notification of filing. However, ......
  • Schumacher Elevator Co., Inc. v. Springfield Elevator Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 13 Febrero 1991
    ...held § 617.3 does not require proof of receipt or date of delivery of the Notification of Filing to a nonresident defendant. Buena Vista Manor, 221 N.W.2d at 288. Applying that holding, we rule defendant's first attack on the sufficiency of proof of service is without Defendant's second att......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT