Bull v. Novice State Bank
Decision Date | 14 March 1923 |
Docket Number | (No. 6555.) |
Citation | 250 S.W. 232 |
Parties | BULL v. NOVICE STATE BANK. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Coleman County Court; L. G. Mathews, Judge.
Suit by R. C. Bull against the Novice State Bank. From a judgment for a sum less than prayed for, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed in part, and reversed and rendered in part.
Snodgrass & Dibrell, of Coleman, for appellant.
Critz & Woodward, of Coleman, for appellee.
Appellant's brief states the nature and result of this case, which we find to be substantially correct, as follows:
By this appeal appellant contends that the court erred in failing to render judgment in his behalf upon a certain check for the sum of $154.84, in addition to that rendered herein; which check he alleges was deposited to his credit in appellee bank, on November 18, 1920, drawn in his favor by F. C. Behrend, through W. A. Hughen, on the First National Bank of Coleman, Texas, and by it paid in full on November 29, 1920. Appellee contends that the said check for $154.84 was received by it for collection only, and that it used due diligence in presenting same for acceptance through its correspondent bank, the Coleman National Bank of Coleman, Tex., to the drawee, the First National Bank of Coleman, Tex., and that the payment thereon was stopped or refused, and that upon its return appellee charged it against the account of appellant, upon his indorsement thereon. Upon this issue the trial court found in favor of appellee, and appellant appeals.
We adopt the following testimony as presented by the statement of facts concerning the transaction relative to the $154.84 check in controversy as our own.
H. D. Ayers testified as follows:
Plaintiff here offered in evidence the check identified by the witness, which is as follows:
On back of check:
F. C. Behrend testified as follows:
W. A. Hughen testified as follows:
R. H. Alexander testified as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Town of La Fayette v. Williams
... ... Williams, as Superintendent of Banks, liquidating the Bank of ... LaFayette to give preference of payment of a claim against ... education of Chambers county, keep the money in the state, ... and not send it abroad. At a meeting of the town council on ... occurred. 2 C.J. p. 930; Bull v. Novice State Bank ... (Tex.Civ.App.) 250 S.W. 232; Commercial State ... ...
-
First Nat. Bank v. Wood County
...where the fault is entirely on the drawee bank (Bank v. Bank, 141 Mo. App. 719, 125 S. W. 513). The cited case of Bull v. Novice State Bank (Tex. Civ. App.) 250 S. W. 232, does not present or involve the same question as here. In the special circumstances of that case there was merely presu......
-
Miller v. Farmers' State Bank of Arco
...beyond the 24 hours fixed by section 137 is an acceptance. Other cases support wholly or in part the views stated. Bull v. Novice State Bank (Tex. Civ. App.) 250 S. W. 232; Commercial State Bank v. Harkrider-Keith-Cooke Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 250 S. W. 1069; State Bank v. Weiss, 91 N. Y. S. 2......
-
First Nat. Bank of Winnsboro v. First Nat. Bank of Quitman, Tex.
...arising from the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case and the decisions of the Courts of Civil Appeals in Bull v. Novice State Bank, 250 S. W. 232, and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Jacobs, 287 S. W. 504, and the opinion (on certified questions) in First Nat. Bank ......