Bullard v. State, No. BO-361
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Writing for the Court | BOOTH; WENTWORTH |
Citation | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2477,515 So.2d 1028 |
Docket Number | No. BO-361 |
Decision Date | 28 October 1987 |
Parties | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2477 Eston BULLARD, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Page 1028
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
First District.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 8, 1987.
Page 1029
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and John M. Koenig, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
BOOTH, Judge.
This cause is before us on appeal from a judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict of guilty of armed robbery and sentence to life imprisonment with a three-year mandatory minimum. On appeal, the issues are: first, whether the trial court erred in using appellant's habitual offender status as the reason for departure from the sentencing guidelines recommendation of 12 to 17 years; and second, whether the court's instruction on the intent element of robbery constituted fundamental error. We affirm appellant's conviction, but are required to reverse his sentence and remand for resentencing due to the decision of the Supreme Court of Florida in Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1987).
The facts are that Jacksonville Police Officer Charnita Williams observed appellant walking along a road as she responded to a radio call that there had been a murder in the area. As the officer pulled her car over, appellant walked towards the car with something in his hand. The officer drew her gun and got out of the car as appellant rushed to the rear of the car. After raising his hands, appellant grabbed the officer's wrist and took the gun, pointing it at her. As the officer backed away, appellant got into the marked patrol car and drove away.
Later that day, Nassau County Deputy Sheriff W.G. Dover identified the stolen patrol car exceeding the speed limit and followed it onto a road where he found the car abandoned. Appellant was apprehended after being tracked by a police dog.
The trial court exceeded the guidelines recommendation due to appellant's qualification as a habitual offender. This was error under the holding in Whitehead, supra, wherein the Supreme Court held that habitual offender status is not an adequate reason to depart from the sentencing guidelines. In Brown v. State, 509 So.2d 1164 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), this court further ruled that conviction of a first-degree felony coupled with a habitual offender status does not require a mandatory sentence of life imprisonment...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Steele v. State, No. 89-2038
...trial court, is error that amounts to a denial of due process. Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701, 704 fn. 7 (Fla.1978). In Bullard v. State, 515 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 1st DCA Page 645 1987), review denied, 529 So.2d 693 (Fla.1988), an issue involved an erroneous robbery instruction, which had not b......
-
Bullard v. State
...693 529 So.2d 693 Bullard (Eston, Jr.) v. State NO. 72,016 Supreme Court of Florida. JUN 20, 1988 Appeal From: 1st DCA 515 So.2d 1028 Rev....
-
Steele v. State, No. 89-2038
...trial court, is error that amounts to a denial of due process. Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701, 704 fn. 7 (Fla.1978). In Bullard v. State, 515 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 1st DCA Page 645 1987), review denied, 529 So.2d 693 (Fla.1988), an issue involved an erroneous robbery instruction, which had not b......
-
Bullard v. State
...693 529 So.2d 693 Bullard (Eston, Jr.) v. State NO. 72,016 Supreme Court of Florida. JUN 20, 1988 Appeal From: 1st DCA 515 So.2d 1028 Rev....