Burks v. State

Decision Date14 October 1997
Docket NumberNo. S97A1676,S97A1676
Citation491 S.E.2d 368,268 Ga. 504
PartiesBURKS v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Rodney L. Allen, Moultrie, for Charlie Frank Burks.

J. David Miller, Dist. Atty., Charles M. Stines, Asst. Dist. Atty., Moultrie, Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Angelica M. Woo, Asst. Atty. Gen., Paula K. Smith, Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

HUNSTEIN, Justice.

Charlie Frank Burks was convicted of two counts of felony murder, three counts of aggravated assault, and five counts of possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. He appeals from the judgment and sentence entered thereon. 1

In his sole enumeration of error, appellant contends the evidence was not sufficient to support the jury's verdict finding him guilty as a party to the crimes for which he was convicted. The jury was authorized to find that shortly after a fight at a dance at the American Legion Hall in Moultrie between members of the Crawford family and members of appellant's family, appellant was seen loading a gun while in the company of his cousin, Stanley Owens, and another family member who had participated in the fight. Appellant, Owens, and other Burks family members then went to the hall where appellant initiated a fight with Crawford family members inside the hall. When Emanuel Simpson (a Crawford family member) broke up the fight and went outside, appellant followed and attacked Simpson from behind with a beer bottle. As the two men fought, Owens retrieved a shotgun from appellant's car; walked up to the edge of the crowd watching the fight; and fired two or three rounds of triple-aught buckshot from a sawed-off shotgun, fatally wounding Simpson and a Crawford family friend, James Singletary. The pellets also wounded two women and a man in the crowd as well as appellant. Five witnesses heard appellant tell Owens to shoot Simpson. Appellant and Owens (along with other Burks family members) fled the scene together. Appellant was apprehended approximately two hours later with a bandanna covering a gunshot wound to his left arm. Owens, who pled guilty to felony murder, testified at appellant's trial that he acted on his own.

A participant to a crime may be convicted although he is not the person who directly commits the crime. OCGA § 16-2-20. A person who intentionally aids or abets in the commission of a crime or intentionally advises, encourages, hires, counsels or procures another to commit the crime may be convicted of the crime as a party to the crime. Id. at (b)(3) and (4). Mere presence at the scene is not sufficient to convict one of being a party to a crime, but criminal intent may be inferred from conduct before, during, and after the commission of a crime. Sands v. State, 262 Ga. 367(2), 418 S.E.2d 55 (1992). Whether appellant was a party to the crime and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
40 cases
  • York v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 21, 2000
    ...in the burglary, armed robbery, and aggravated assaults of Crawford and Green. OCGA § 16-2-20 (parties to a crime); Burks v. State, 268 Ga. 504, 505, 491 S.E.2d 368 (1997). Crawford's testimony further showed that the men were not "invited" into the residence, contrary to their assertions o......
  • Boggs v. The State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • June 30, 2010
    ...a party to the robbery of the homeless victim rather than merely present at the scene of the crime. See generally Burks v. State, 268 Ga. 504, 505, 491 S.E.2d 368 (1997) (“Mere presence at the scene is not sufficient to convict one of being a party to a crime[.]”). We disagree. “A person co......
  • Wright v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 22, 2022
    ...to a crime may be convicted although [she] is not the person who directly commits the crime. OCGA § 16-2-20." Burks v. State , 268 Ga. 504, 505, 491 S.E.2d 368 (1997). Any "person who intentionally aids or abets in the commission of a crime or intentionally advises, encourages, hires, couns......
  • Ward v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • September 13, 1999
    ...during and after the commission of the crime. Peterson v. State, 204 Ga.App. 532(1), 419 S.E.2d 757 (1992). See also Burks v. State, 268 Ga. 504, 505, 491 S.E.2d 368 (1997). The evidence was sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to conclude that appellant possessed the requisite ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT