Buskey v. Am. Legion Post

Citation910 N.W.2d 9
Decision Date04 April 2018
Docket NumberA16-0216
Parties William BUSKEY, et al., Appellants, v. AMERICAN LEGION POST #270, d/b/a Buffalo American Legion or Buffalo American Legion Post, Respondent.
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota (US)

910 N.W.2d 9

William BUSKEY, et al., Appellants,
v.
AMERICAN LEGION POST #270, d/b/a Buffalo American Legion or Buffalo American Legion Post, Respondent.

A16-0216

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Filed: April 4, 2018


Kay Nord Hunt, Lommen Abdo, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Guy E. Mattson, Heartland Injury Law, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, for appellants.

Joseph A. Nilan, Joshua A. Dorothy, T. James Power, Gregerson, Rosow, Johnson & Nilan, Ltd., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondent.

Matthew J. Barber, James S. Ballentine, Schwebel, Goetz & Sieben, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for amicus curiae Minnesota Association for Justice.

OPINION

CHUTICH, Justice.

Appellants William Buskey, et al. (the Buskeys) brought claims against respondent American Legion Post #270 (American Legion) under the Civil Damages Act for damages allegedly arising out of the death of Mary Jo Meyer-Buskey in an automobile accident caused by a drunk driver. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the liquor licensee, American Legion, finding that the Buskeys failed to provide timely notice of their claims. The district court specifically concluded that the correspondence of the Buskeys’ attorney with American Legion’s liquor-liability insurer and liquor-liability attorney did not qualify as "[a]ctual notice" to American Legion under Minnesota Statutes section 340A.802, subdivision 2 (2016). A divided court of appeals affirmed, holding that the actual-notice provision required American Legion itself to have actual notice of each claimant’s identity and intent to pursue a claim. Meyer v. Am. Legion Post #270 , No. A16-0216, 2016 WL 7338739, at *6–7 (Minn. App. Dec. 19, 2016).

Based on the plain language of the statute, we hold that the actual-notice provision requires actual notice of sufficient facts to put the licensee on inquiry notice of a possible claim, not actual notice of a possible claim. In addition, the statute’s plain language does not require notice of certain indispensable facts; it requires notice only of "sufficient facts." Finally, based on principles of agency law, we hold that actual notice to a licensee’s liquor-liability attorney is notice to the licensee under section 340A.802, subdivision 2. Applying these principles and drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of the Buskeys on this issue of actual notice, we hold that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to American Legion. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the district court for reinstatement of the Buskeys’ claims.

FACTS

The facts of this case are not in dispute. They involve three groups of plaintiffs who provided various forms of notice to American Legion, its liquor-liability insurer, and its attorney. Key to determining whether the actual-notice provision of Minnesota Statutes section 340A.802, subdivision 2, was satisfied is an understanding of who had notice of what and when . "The summary judgment standard mandates that we view the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party," which is the Buskeys. Kelly v. Kraemer Constr., Inc. , 896 N.W.2d 504, 506 (Minn. 2017).

On October 19, 2012, Mary Jo Meyer-Buskey died in an automobile accident after her vehicle was hit by the car of drunk driver Zachary Jennings and hit again by a third car. Jennings had previously been drinking alcohol at American Legion. His car crossed the center line and struck

910 N.W.2d 12

Meyer-Buskey’s vehicle, killing Meyer-Buskey and injuring passengers Jonathan Meyer, Meyer-Buskey’s son; Kimberly Meyer, Meyer-Buskey’s daughter-in-law; and Sonja Sjolander, a disabled adult in Meyer-Buskey’s foster care.

Following the accident, various occupants of Meyer-Buskey’s vehicle and their relatives sued American Legion. Passengers Jonathan and Kimberly Meyer (the Meyers) and Sonja Sjolander (along with her guardian) brought claims for their injuries under the Civil Damages Act.1 The Buskeys also brought claims under the Act for damages arising from Mary Jo Meyer-Buskey’s death; these plaintiffs included Meyer-Buskey’s spouse, William Buskey, and children, Jeremiah Buskey, Ben Meyer, Katie Hodgson, Jenny Venstad, and Elizabeth Bork. The Act provides a right of action to various persons injured by an illegal sale of alcohol to an intoxicated person, including "[a] spouse, child, parent, guardian, employer, or other person [otherwise] injured in person, property, or means of support, or who incurs other pecuniary loss." Minn. Stat. § 340A.801, subd. 1 (2016).

The plaintiffs’ complaint was served upon American Legion nearly 2 years after the tragic accident. American Legion first became aware of the accident, however, shortly after the collision from its own independent investigation. In the days and weeks following the accident, American Legion employees heard that Jennings had been involved in an accident involving a fatality after he consumed alcohol at American Legion. Less than 2 weeks after the accident, American Legion’s manager had the waitress who served Jennings provide a written statement, which documented that she had served him four drinks but that he did not appear intoxicated. American Legion had no knowledge of any claims against it at this time. The issues here concern American Legion’s notice of the Buskeys’ claims.

The Buskeys retained attorney Guy Mattson on October 25, 2012, in conjunction with their dram-shop claims against American Legion. This entry into an attorney-client relationship triggered the Buskeys’ responsibility to provide written notice of their claims to American Legion. Minn. Stat. § 340A.802, subd. 2 ; see id. , subd. 1 (2016) (describing the required contents of "written notice to the licensee"). This notice of claim "must be served by the claimant’s attorney within 240 days of the date of entering an attorney-client relationship." Id. , subd. 2. The Buskeys, therefore, had until June 22, 2013, to give American Legion notice of their claims. It is undisputed that the Buskeys never provided timely written notice to American Legion itself.

The other injured passengers were separately represented. On November 28, 2012, Sjolander’s attorney mailed her written notice to American Legion. This notice made no mention of Meyer-Buskey or her family. Five months after the fatal accident, in March 2013, an unidentified American Legion employee delivered Sjolander’s notice to Thomes Insurance Agency, which then forwarded it to Capitol Specialty, American Legion’s dram-shop insurer.

A Capitol Specialty employee then opened a new claim file and began investigating the accident. She identified Mary Jo Meyer-Buskey as a victim and found her obituary, which listed the names of her spouse and children. She also spoke to

910 N.W.2d 13

another insurance adjuster who informed her that Mattson was "Mary Jo’s attorney." She then phoned Mattson and made notes in the file that "[h]e represents her husband Bill and their collective children—2 from their marriage, she had 4 from a prior marriage and he had 2 from prior." She made no notes concerning the Buskeys’ individual names.

In response, Mattson faxed a letter to this same Capitol Specialty employee that is perhaps best described as a letter of representation. This letter, sent on March 22, 2013, is addressed to Capitol Specialty and references "Your Insured: American Legion" and "Date of Loss: 10/19/2012." The subject line reads "My Client: Mary Jo Meyer-Buskey," but the text of the letter states that Mattson was "retained to represent the family of Mary Jo Meyer-Buskey for claims related to her death."2

Around this same time, the Capitol Specialty employee contacted attorney Joseph Nilan and retained him to represent American Legion. She requested that the "file" be sent to Nilan on a compact disc, but the record does not establish if this file included her notes and the March 22, 2013 letter that she received from Mattson on the Buskeys’ behalf.

The record does not establish how Nilan came to know of the Buskeys or their counsel, but he reached out to Mattson by mail not long after Capitol Specialty retained his services. An April 5, 2013 letter from Nilan to Mattson referenced "Your Client: Family of Mary Jo Meyer-Buskey" and "Our Client: Buffalo American Legion Post" for the "Date of Loss: October 19, 2012." In this correspondence, Nilan requested that Mattson "[p]lease cease any communications with the American Legion and direct all future correspondence regarding this matter to our office."

Shortly thereafter, the Wright County Sheriff personally served American Legion with a written notice of claim from the Meyers. Notably, this notice-of-claim letter referenced "the death[ ] of Mary Jo Meyer-Buskey," but did not explicitly identify the Buskeys or their intent to bring claims of their own. By April 2013, then, American Legion had received timely written notice from Sjolander’s attorney and the Meyers’ attorney, but it had not received written notice from the Buskeys’ attorney. The Buskeys made no further attempts to provide American Legion, or its attorney, with formal written notice within the 240-day timeframe, which ended on June 22, 2013. See Minn. Stat. § 340A.802.

The Buskeys served and filed their lawsuit the following year, in fall 2014. Before the close of discovery, American Legion moved for summary judgment on...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Firefighters Union Local 4725 v. City of Brainerd, A18-0398
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • October 9, 2019
    ...in order to make it embody a more sound public policy, the Legislature, not the Judiciary, must be the reviser"); Buskey v. Am. Legion Post #270 , 910 N.W.2d 9, 14 (Minn. 2018) ("When the words of a law in their application to an existing situation are clear and free from all ambiguity, the......
  • Creekview of Hugo Ass'n, Inc. v. Owners Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota
    • May 29, 2019
    ...intermediate level of specificity not suggested by the statute, Minnesota case law, or even Owners' brief. Cf. Buskey v. Am. Legion Post #270 , 910 N.W.2d 9, 15, 17 (Minn. 2018) (rejecting defendant's argument that the Minnesota Civil Damages Act's actual-notice provision requires that a de......
  • State v. Mattson
    • United States
    • Minnesota Court of Appeals
    • March 18, 2019
    ...1. The state also argues that notice to Mattson's attorney should be imputed to Mattson. The state cites to Buskey v. Am. Legion Post #270, 910 N.W.2d 9 (Minn. 2018), a recent Minnesota dram-shop action case, to support imputing notice from one party to another. The Minnesota Supreme Court ......
  • Yde v. Viking Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
    • United States
    • Minnesota Court of Appeals
    • July 2, 2018
    ...the supposition of what facts might be proved at trial may be sufficient to survive a summary-judgment motion. Buskey v. Am. Legion Post #270, 910 N.W.2d 9, 10 (Minn. 2018) (stating that courts might infer knowledge of possible claims and potential claimants when a letter suggests that a pa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT