Butler v. Allen
| Decision Date | 16 February 1968 |
| Citation | 287 N.Y.S.2d 197,29 A.D.2d 799 |
| Parties | In the Matter of Lester BUTLER, Appellant, v. James E. ALLEN, Jr., as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York at al., Respondents. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
John Dunaif, Brooklyn, for appellant.
John P. Jehu, Albany, for respondents.
Before GIBSON, P.J., and HERLIHY, REYNOLDS, AULISI and STALEY, JJ.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, which, on respondents' motion (CPLR 7804, subd. (f)), dismissed the petition in a proceeding brought pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review a determination of respondent Commissioner sustaining the action of the Board of Education of the City of New York in discontinuing petitioner's services as a junior high school teacher before the expiration of his probationary period.
By letter addressed to him by the deputy superintendent of schools, petitioner was 'requested to be present at an interview in reference to' his principal's report and was advised by that letter that at such interview he would be 'given the opportunity to present (his) refutation concerning the Principal's Report.' The principal's report thus referred to gave petitioner an 'unsatisfactory' rating and did not recommend his continued service. Petitioner urges, among other grounds entitling him to judgment annulling the respondent Commissioner's determination, that he 'was not given time to prepare his defense; was not permitted to be represented by counsel; was denied cross-examination; and denied the opportunity to call witnesses', constituting, in his view, denial of due process.
Thus, appellant's main argument, as summarized by him, is that his 'procedural rights were violated'; but, of necessity, his basic complaint must be that he was dismissed, and, as an incident of his dismissal, denied tenure, without a formal hearing after preferment of charges (cf. Matter of Pinto v. Wynstra, 22 A.D.2d 914, 255 N.Y.S.2d 536). Whatever the course of the 'interview' and the conduct of the procedures accorded him, whether gratuitously or otherwise, the ultimate issue is that of his dismissal and this was authorized, without restriction, 'at any time during (the) probationary period, on the recommendation of the superintendent of schools, by a majority vote of the board of education.' (Education Law, § 2573, subd. 1.) Nothing that occurred prior to that discontinuance of his service, and nothing in section 105--a of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Anderson v. Board of Ed. of City of Yonkers
...State Div. of Human Rights, 38 A.D.2d 657, 327 N.Y.S.2d 110, affd. 30 N.Y.2d 925, 335 N.Y.S.2d 681, 287 N.E.2d 376; Mtr. of Butler v. Allen, 29 A.D.2d 799, 287 N.Y.S.2d 150; Pinto v. Wynstra, 22 A.D.2d 914, 255 N.Y.S.2d In Matters regarding the discontinuance of a probationary teacher's ser......
-
Sanford v. Rockefeller
...he loses the protections afforded by the Civil Service Law 3 and may be discharged as a probationary employee (e.g., Butler v. Allen, 29 A.D.2d 799, 287 N.Y.S.2d 197; Pinto v. Wynstra, 22 A.D.2d 914, 255 N.Y.S.2d 536). Moreover, while the suspension of tenure rights lasts for only one year,......
-
Lindsey v. Board of Ed. of Mt. Morris Central School Dist.
...on the other hand, may be terminated without a hearing and without specifying a reason for the termination (Matter of Butler v. Allen, 29 A.D.2d 799, 287 N.Y.S.2d 197; Matter of Pinto v. Wynstra, 22 A.D.2d 914, 255 N.Y.S.2d 536; but see Education Law, § 3031). If the Board denies tenure the......
-
Board of Ed. of Chautauqua Central School Dist. v. Chautauqua Central School Teachers Ass'n
...924, 293 N.E.2d 92 (December 29, 1972)). See, e.g., Matter of Pinto v. Wynstra, 22 A.D.2d 914, 255 N.Y.S.2d 536; Matter of Butler v. Allen, 29 A.D.2d 799, 287 N.Y.S.2d 197; Education Law, §§ 2573, 3012, In Legislative Conference, Supra, a Brooklyn College instructor, following an unanimous ......