Byers v. Voisine (In re Voisine), 20120325.
| Decision Date | 18 December 2012 |
| Docket Number | No. 20120325.,20120325. |
| Citation | 823 N.W.2d 786,2012 ND 250 |
| Parties | In the Interest of Raymond J. VOISINE. Jonathan Byers, Special Assistant State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee, v. Raymond J. Voisine, Respondent and Appellant. |
| Court | North Dakota Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from the District Court of Sheridan County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.
Jonathan R. Byers, Special Assistant State's Attorney, Office of Attorney General, Bismarck, N.D., for petitioner and appellee.
Kent M. Morrow, Bismarck, N.D., for respondent and appellant.
[¶ 1] Voisine appeals from a trial court order denying his request for discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. Voisine argues the trial court erred in finding he has a congenital or acquired condition manifested by a mental, physical, or sexual disorder; is likely to engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct; and has serious difficulty controlling his behavior. We conclude the trial court's order is supported by clear and convincing evidence, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDEWALLE, C.J., MARY MUEHLEN MARING, DALE V. SANDSTROM, DANIEL J. CROTHERS and cAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Erickson v. Voisine (In re Interest of Voisine), 20190155
...647 ; Interest of Voisine , 2016 ND 254, ¶ 24, 888 N.W.2d 781 ; Interest of Voisine , 2014 ND 178, ¶ 2, 859 N.W.2d 930 ; Interest of Voisine , 2012 ND 250, ¶ 1, 823 N.W.2d 786. This Court also affirmed a district court order denying post-conviction relief. Voisine v. State , 2014 ND 98, ¶ 2......
-
Byers v. Voisine (In re Interest of Voisine)
...of Voisine , 2010 ND 241, 795 N.W.2d 38 (summarily affirming commitment as sexually dangerous individual); Interest of Voisine , 2012 ND 250, 823 N.W.2d 786 (summarily affirming denial of request for discharge from commitment as sexually dangerous individual); Voisine v. State , 2014 ND 98,......
-
Byers v. Voisine (In re Voisine)
...N.W.2d 38. The district court denied his subsequent petitions for discharge from commitment, which were affirmed on appeal. See Interest of Voisine , 2012 ND 250, ¶ 1, 823 N.W.2d 786 ; Interest of Voisine , 2014 ND 178, ¶ 2, 859 N.W.2d 930 ; Interest of Voisine , 2016 ND 254, ¶ 24, 888 N.W.......
-
Voisine v. State, 20140010.
...of Voisine, 2010 ND 241, ¶ 1, 795 N.W.2d 38 (summarily affirming involuntary commitment as sexually dangerous individual); Interest of Voisine, 2012 ND 250, ¶ 1, 823 N.W.2d 786 (summarily affirming denial of request for discharge from commitment as sexually dangerous offender).[¶ 2] In this......