C.F., In Interest of, A91A0588
| Decision Date | 04 June 1991 |
| Docket Number | No. A91A0588,A91A0588 |
| Parties | In the Interest of C.F., a child. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Carey, Deal, Jarrard & Walker, Mary R. Carden, Gainesville, for appellant.
T. Andrew Dowdy, Cornelia, for appellee.
Ronald Fowler, pro se.
Grace Blackwell filed a petition in the Juvenile Court of Habersham County seeking permanent custody of C.F., her deceased daughter's child. C.F.'s father and paternal grandparents filed a joint answer. We granted Blackwell's discretionary appeal from the Juvenile Court's denial of her petition and award of permanent legal custody of C.F. to the paternal grandparents.
The record reveals that Habersham County DFCS obtained temporary custody of C.F., who was then 13 months old and living in Blackwell's home, in July 1989 when her mother was killed in a train accident. At the time of her mother's death, C.F.'s father was in jail awaiting trial on charges of manufacturing marijuana. Although DFCS was awarded legal custody, the agency continued physical custody in Blackwell. In December 1989, Blackwell filed this petition in the juvenile court seeking temporary and permanent legal custody. In his answer, the father recognized the possibility that the court might find him unfit to be awarded custody of his daughter, and executed an affidavit stating that he had no objection to the court awarding permanent legal custody of C.F. to his natural parents, with whom he was then living. After the hearing held on the petition, the father and paternal grandparents filed an amendment to their answer withdrawing the father as a co-respondent to the petition; alleging that the father no longer lived with his parents; and including an affidavit from the father surrendering his parental rights to C.F. in favor of his parents. Without further hearing, the trial court issued its order awarding the paternal grandparents permanent legal custody of C.F., finding that as a matter of law the paternal grandparents were entitled to custody by virtue of their son's "assignment [of custody] to them."
1. Blackwell contends the order is void because the juvenile court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. We agree and reverse.
In the Interest of C.C., 193 Ga.App. 120, 121(1), 387 S.E.2d 46 (1989) controls this appeal. Here, as in C.C., there was no order of the superior court transferring the issue of custody so as to meet the requirements of OCGA § 15-11-5(c) for juvenile court ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
W.W.W., In Interest of
...690, 212 S.E.2d 853; In re J.R.T., 233 Ga. 204, 210 S.E.2d 684; Colton v. Martins, 230 Ga. 482, 197 S.E.2d 729; see In the Interest of C.F., 199 Ga.App. 858, 406 S.E.2d 279; Neal v. Washington, 158 Ga.App. 39, 279 S.E.2d 294; see Conroy v. Jones, 238 Ga. 321, 232 S.E.2d 917; In the Interest......
-
Lewis v. Winzenreid
...courts of this state. See Lockhart v. Stancil, supra; In re J.R.T., 233 Ga. 204, 210 S.E.2d 684 (1974); In the Interest of C.F., 199 Ga.App. 858, 859(1), 406 S.E.2d 279 (1991). It follows that, in the instant case, the superior court was correct in giving no effect to the invalid order of t......
-
Douglas v. Douglas
...authority to grant permanent custody absent a transfer order from the superior court. OCGA § 15-11-28(c)(1); In the Interest of C.F., 199 Ga.App. 858, 859(1), 406 S.E.2d 279 (1991); In the Interest of C.C., 193 Ga.App. 120, 121(1), 387 S.E.2d 46 (1989). Because the issue of permanent custod......
-
In re B.W.
...App. at 178-180, 806 S.E.2d 630 (juvenile court lacked jurisdiction over motion for return of custody); In the Interest of C. F. , 199 Ga. App. 858, 859 (1), 406 S.E.2d 279 (1991) (juvenile court lacked jurisdiction over a petition for permanent custody where the petition did not allege dep......