Cable v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America

Citation89 A.D.2d 636,453 N.Y.S.2d 86
PartiesDorothy CABLE, as Parent and Natural Guardian of Gea Nicole Cable, an Infant, Respondent, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant, and Linda Mazzilli, Appellant.
Decision Date01 July 1982
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

Frank W. Getman, Oneonta (Clifton M. Tamsett, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

Barry M. Lippman, Kingston, for respondent.

Before SWEENEY, J. P., and KANE, CASEY, WEISS and LEVINE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered November 24, 1981 in Ulster County, which denied defendant Mazzilli's motion for summary judgment, granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, and granted defendant Prudential's cross motion for an order granting leave to said defendant to make payment into court of $50,000 plus interest, and upon such payment to discharge it from all further liability and dismiss it from the action.

The underlying action is one to recover on a life insurance policy issued to Robert A. Cable by defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America (Prudential). The beneficiary listed on the policy was defendant Linda Mazzilli. The insured retained the right to change the beneficiary and the policy provided as follows:

You may designate or change a beneficiary. Your request must be in writing and in a form which meets our needs. It will take effect only when we file it at our home office; this will be after you send the contract to us to be endorsed, if we ask you to do so. Then any previous beneficiary's interest will end as of the date of the request. It will end then even if the insured is not living when we file the request.

In late August or early September of 1980, the insured advised Prudential that he wished to change the beneficiary and name his daughter, an infant, the plaintiff in the instant action. He was sent the necessary forms which he signed and returned to the insurance company on September 13, 1980. He did not, however, return the insurance policy to Prudential for endorsement. The insured was again contacted by Prudential on October 8, 1980 and requested to send the policy for endorsement. At this time the insured stated that he would do so. He was killed in an automobile accident on October 9, 1980 without having sent in the policy. Special Term denied defendant Mazzilli's motion for summary judgment but granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and authorized defendant Prudential to make payment into court and upon so doing to be discharged from further liability. This appeal ensued.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether Special Term...

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • Wilton Reassurance Life Co. of N.Y. v. Garbrecht ex rel. D.G.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • November 12, 2014
    ...request. 247 A.D.2d at 514, 669 N.Y.S.2d at 321 (citation omitted). In contrast, the court in Cable v. Prudential Life Ins. Co. of Am., 89 A.D.2d 636, 636, 453 N.Y.S.2d 86, 87 (3d Dep't 1982) concluded that the insured substantially complied where the insurer notified the insured that his r......
  • Lamarche v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maine
    • December 16, 2002
    ...Lopez v. Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co., 170 A.D.2d 583, 566 N.Y.S.2d 359 (N.Y.App.Div.1991); and Cable v. Prudential Ins. Co., 89 A.D.2d 636, 453 N.Y.S.2d 86 (N.Y.App.Div.1982). In each case, the decedent had, prior to death, sent to the insurer's home office a written request for a change of be......
  • Sun Life & Health Ins. Co. v. Colavito
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • March 28, 2014
    ...he died with completed change-of-beneficiary forms in his briefcase, ready to be sent to the insurer); Cable v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 89 A.D.2d 636, 453 N.Y.S.2d 86, 87 (1982) (where insurer notified insured of incomplete submission, the insured communicated his intent to complete......
  • N.Y. Life Ins. Co. v. Brown
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • February 1, 2021
    ...of the insured] to accomplish the change." McCarthy, 92 N.Y.2d at 440 (alteration in original) (quoting Cable v. Prudential Ins. Co., 89 A.D.2d 636, 636, 453 N.Y.S.2d 86 (3d Dep't 1982)). Accordingly, "if the decedent has done all that was reasonably possible to do to show his intention or ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT