Caho v. Norfolk & S. Ry. Co
Citation | 147 N.C. 20,60 S.E. 640 |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina |
Decision Date | 04 March 1908 |
Parties | CAHO . v. NORFOLK & S. RY. CO. et al. |
Where defendants join in a demurrer to the complaint, if the complaint states a causeof action against either of defendants, the demurrer must be overruled.
[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 39, Pleading, § 463.]
In the absence of an express contract made prior to the performance of the services, an officer of a corporation cannot maintain an action for compensation.
[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 12, Corporations, §§ 1334-1338.]
Where power is conferred by the charter on corporate directors to elect officers and fix their salaries, the salaries must be fixed at the time of election, and cannot be left open for future adjustment.
[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 12, Corporations, § 1341.]
A contract properly made by corporate stockholders for extra compensation of one of its officers is valid without approval of the board of directors.
[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 12, Corporations, § 1341.]
Appeal from Superior Court, Pamlico County; Lyon, Judge.
Action by W. T. Caho against the Norfolk & Southern Railway Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiff on demurrer to the complaint, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
This cause was heard upon demurrer to the complaint. Plaintiff alleged: The incorporation of the several defendants.
For a second cause of action plaintiff complains and alleges:
Attached to the complaint is a copy of the proceedings of the board of directors of the Pamlico, Oriental & Western Railroad Company: "February 27, 1906. Pursuant to the call of the president, the board, etc., met and was called to order by the president, W. T. Caho. * * * The following directors were present: W. T. Caho, D. H. Hooker, etc. The president called D. H. Hooker to the chair and retired. W. T. Caho presented his account to the board and on motion the account was filed with the secretary. * * * On motion of C. M. Babbitt, the following account of W. T. Caho, president of the P., O. & W. R. R. Co. was allowed, to wit: " The account consists of a number of items, such as services rendered in procuring charter of March 9, 1891, $500; credit by amount paid by charter members $235; by shares of stock to be issued at $10 a share $250; to advertising meeting to organize, $350; other items for advertising meeting for organization aggregating about $50. On September 30, 1891, a balance is struck showing amount due plaintiff $66.25.
It is stated that this amount is due "up to and including organization." On June 18, 1892, a charge is made for "salary and fees as president from June, 1891, to June, 1892, $500." A similar charge is made on June 18th of each year up to and including June 18, 1901. On June 18, 1902, 1903, and 1904, a charge of $900 annually for "salary and fees as president." On April 20, 1905, a charge is made of $1,000 for "salary and fees as president, including Incidental expenses to date from June 18, 1904." Two items are charged—June 18, 1903, and June 18, 1904...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Wenatchee-Stratford Orchard Co.
... ... 335, 36 C.C.A. 370; Dial v. Co., 52 Wash. 81, 85, ... 86, 100 P. 157; Home, etc., Co. v. Tillman, 125 Ga ... 172, 53 S.E. 1019, 1022; Caho v. Ry. Co., 147 N.C ... 20, 60 S.E. 640; Utica & Co. v. Waggoner, etc., Co., ... 166 Mich. 618, 132 N.W. 502; O'Brien v. O'Brien ... Boiler Works ... ...
- Davis v. Rhodes
-
Davis v. Rhodes
... ... however expertly stated, an enforceable cause of action ... Ladd v. Ladd, 121 N.C. 118, 28 S.E. 190; Lassiter v ... Norfolk & C. R. Co., 136 N.C. 89, 48 S.E. 642, 1 Ann.Cas ... When, ... however, there is an enforceable cause of action stated but ... expressed, the demurrer will be overruled. Blackmore v ... Winders, 144 N.C. 212, 56 S.E. 874; Caho v. Norfolk ... & S. R. Co., 147 N.C. 20, 60 S.E. 640. If the defendant ... desired a more certain and definite statement of the alleged ... ...
-
Fulton v. Talbert
...amount and method of paying compensation for services to be rendered are not void or voidable per se. G.S. § 55-30; Caho v. Norfolk & S. R. R., 147 N.C. 20, 60 S.E. 640; North Carolina Agricultural Credit Corp. v. Boushall, 193 N.C. 605, 137 S.E. 721; Putnam v. Juvenile Shoe Corp., 307 Mo. ......